SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Türk Üstün Zeka ve Eğitim Dergisi / 2014 / Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1

The Associative Basis of Scientific Creativity: A Model Proposal

Bilimsel Yaratıcılığın Çağrışımsal Temelleri: Model Önerisi

ESRA KANLI DENİZCİ
Pages
37–50
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This model claims that, similarity and mediation constitutes the basis of creativity and focuses on three components namely; associative thinking, analogical thinking (analogical reasoning & analogical problem solving) and insight which are considered to be main elements of scientific associative thinking

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Creativity is accepted as an important part of scientific skills.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Scientific creativity proceeds from a need or urge to solve a problem, and involves the production of original and useful ideas or products.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This model claims that, similarity and mediation constitutes the basis of creativity and focuses on three components namely; associative thinking, analogical thinking (analogical reasoning & analogical problem solving) and insight which are considered to be main elements of scientific associative thinking
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Creativity is accepted as an important part of scientific skills. Scientific creativity proceeds from a need or urge to solve a problem, and involves the production of original and useful ideas or products. Existing scientific creativity theories and tests do not feature the very important thinking processes, such as analogical and associative thinking, which can be considered crucial in creative scientific problem solving. Current study’s aim is to provide an alternative model and explicate the associative basis of scientific creativity. Emerging from the reviewed theoretical framework, Scientific Associations Model is proposed. This model claims that, similarity and mediation constitutes the basis of creativity and focuses on three components namely; associative thinking, analogical thinking (analogical reasoning & analogical problem solving) and insight which are considered to be main elements of scientific associative thinking

Özet

Yaratıcılığın bilimsel becerilerin önemli bir yönü olduğu kabul edilir. Bilimsel yaratıcılık bir ihtiyaç veya bir problemi çözme isteği durumlarında ortaya çıkar ve özgün ve yararlı fikir veya ürünlerin ortaya konulması sürecini kapsar. Mevcut bilimsel yaratıcılık teorileri ve testleri, fen bilimleri alanında hem alan bilgisi hem de problem çözme, özellikle farklı bakış açılarını kullanarak yani yaratıcı şekilde problem çözmek için çok ciddi önem arz eden analojik ve çağrışımsal düşünme süreçlerine yer vermemektedirler. Mevcut çalışma alternatif bir model önerisi sunmayı amaçlamakta ve bilimsel yaratıcılığı çağrışımsal temelleri üzerinden irdelemektedir. İncelenen kuramsal çerçeveden hareketle oluşturulan Bilimsel Çağrışımlar Modeli, bilimsel yaratıcılığın temelinde benzerlik ve aracılığı içeren çağrışımsal düşünmenin yer aldığını savunmakta ve çağrışımsal düşünme, analojik düşünme (analojik nedenselleme & analojik problem çözme) ve içgörü olmak üzere 3 temel bileşene odaklanmaktadır

🔖

Cite This Article

DENİZCİ, E. K. (2014). The Associative Basis of Scientific Creativity: A Model Proposal. Türk Üstün Zeka ve Eğitim Dergisi, Cilt: 4 - Sayı: 1, 37–50. https://ajindex.com/articles/327872

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Aktamış, H. (2007). “Bilimsel Süreç Becerileri Eğitiminin Öğrencilerin Yaratıcılık, Derse Karşı Tutum ve Akademik Başarı Düzeylerine Etkisi”. Yayınlanmamış Doktora Tezi, Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi,
  2. İzmir.
  3. Ansburg, P. I. (2000). Individual differences in problem solving via insight. Current Psychology, 19(2), 143-146.
  4. Amabile, T. M. (1996). Creativity in context: The Social Psychology of Creativity. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  5. Baer, J. (1991). Generality of creativity across performance domains. Creativity Research Journal, 4, 23-39.
  6. Baer, J. (1993). Creativity and divergent thinking: A Task-specific approach. Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates. Baer, J. (1994). Divergent thinking is not a general trait: A multi-domain training experiment. Creativity Research Journal, 7, 35-46.
  7. Baer, J. (1996). The effects of task-specific divergent-thinking training. Journal of Creative Behavior, 30, 183–187.
  8. Baer, J. (1998). The case for domain specificity of creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 11(2), 173-177.
  9. Boden, M. A. (2004). The creative mind: Myths and mechanisms. London: Routledge. Crammond, B. (1994). We can trust creativity tests. Educational Leadership, 52, 70-71.
  10. Cropley, A. (1999). Definitions of creativity. In S. R. Pritzker & M. A. Runco (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity (pp.511-524).
  11. San Diego, CA: Academic Press.
  12. Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1988). Society, culture, and person. A system view of creativity. In R. J. Sternberg (Ed.) The Nature of Creativity (pp.325-339). New York Cambridge University Press Davidson, J. E., & Sternberg, R. J. (1984). The role of insight in intellectual giftedness. Gifted Child Quarterly, 28, 58-64.
  13. Dunbar, K. (1995). How scientists really reason: Scientific reasoning in real-world laboratories. In R. J. Sternberg, & J. E. Davidson (Eds.), The Nature of Insight (pp. 365–395).
  14. Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press.
  15. Dunbar, K. (1997). Conceptual structures and processes in creative thought. In T.B. Ward, S. M. Smith, & J. Vaid (Eds.) Creative Thought: An investigation of conceptual structures and processes. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association Books. Dunbar, K. (1999). Science. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, (pp. 525-531).
  16. SanDiego, CA: Academic Press.
  17. Fasko, D. (1999). Associative theory. In M. A. Runco & S. R. Pritzker (Eds.), Encyclopedia of Creativity, (pp. 525-531).
  18. SanDiego, CA: Academic Press.Feldman, D. H. (1994). Beyond universals in cognitive development. (2nd Ed.) Norwo