Journals / Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi / 2003 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

Büyük Bir İktisatçının Metafizik Değer Yargılarına Bakışı: Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Vizyon Kavramı

Pages
1–26
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, the argument is made that, Schumpeter’s theory of vision as an preanalytic cognitive act is both tenable and useful.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Probably the widest focus for examining Joseph A.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Schumpeter’s theoretical work revolves around the problem of capitalism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, the argument is made that, Schumpeter’s theory of vision as an preanalytic cognitive act is both tenable and useful.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:metodoloji · methodology

Abstract

Probably the widest focus for examining Joseph A. Schumpeter’s theoretical work revolves around the problem of capitalism. And most of his work was concerned with probing some phase of this problem. But this is not all of Schumpeter’s work. Thus, it is necessary to say a few words about Schumpeter’s notion of vision, a concept that deserves to be much more analyzed. And distinguishing Schumpeter’s positive notion of ideology from his vision, the article discuss the impact of the metaphysical colored value judgments on the formulation of scientist’s analytical propositions. Finally, the argument is made that, Schumpeter’s theory of vision as an preanalytic cognitive act is both tenable and useful.

Özet

Joseph A. Schumpeter’in teorik çalışması üzerinde belki de en önemli odaklanma kapitalizm problemi etrafında yoğunlaşmıştır. Tabiî onun eserlerinin çoğu da bu problemin aşamaları ile ilgilidir. Ancak bu, Schumpeter’in çalışmalarının tüm içeriğini yansıtmamaktadır. Dolayısıyla, Schumpeter’in daha fazla analiz edilmeyi hak eden vizyon kavramı hakkında en azından birkaç söz söylemek gereklidir. Ayrıca bu makale, Schumpeter’in pozitif anlam yüklediği ideoloji kavramı ile vizyon kavramını birbirlerinden ayrıştırarak, bilim adamının analitik önermelerini oluştururken maruz kaldığı metafizik nitelikli değer yargılarının etkilerini tartışmaktadır. Son olarak, Schumpeter’in bilim öncesi bilişsel hareket olarak tanımladığı vizyon teorisinin hem savunulabilir hem de yararlı olduğu iddiası ileri sürülmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZILKAYA, E. İ. (2003). Büyük Bir İktisatçının Metafizik Değer Yargılarına Bakışı: Joseph A. Schumpeter'in Vizyon Kavramı. Uludağ Üniversitesi İktisadi ve İdari Bilimler Fakültesi Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 1–26. https://ajindex.com/articles/326689

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (21)

  1. Andersen, Esben S. (1991). The Core of Schumpeter’s Work, Smaskrift, (68), The IKE Group: Institute for Production, Aalborg University, Aalborg. Blaug, Mark. (1985).
  2. Economic Theory in Retrospect, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  3. Blaug, Mark. (1986). Kuhn versus Lakatos, or Paradigms versus Research Programmes in the History of Economics, Economic History and the History of Economics, 233-264,
  4. New York, New York University Press.
  5. Boland, Lawrence A. (1997). Critical Economic Methodology: A Personal Odyssey, London, Routledge. Chalk, Alfred F. (1958). Schumpeter’s Views on the Relationship of Philosophy andEconomics, Southern Economic Journal, 24, 271-282.
  6. Demir, Ömer. (1995). Joseph A. Schumpeter: Hayatı, Eserleri ve Katkıları, Ankara Üniversitesi Siyasal Bilgiler Fakültesi Dergisi, 50, (1-2), 155-172.
  7. Eren, Ercan. (1994).
  8. İktisatta Yöntem, Bursa, Ezgi Kitabevi Yayınları.
  9. Gottlieb, Manuel. (1959). The Ideological Influence in Schumpeter’s Thought, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 19, 1-42.
  10. Graça Moura, Mario da. (2000). Metatheory as the Key to Understanding: Schumpeter after Shionoya, paper presented at Conference 2000: Critical Realism: What Difference Does It Make?, May 5th / 7th 2000,
  11. Cambridge Realist Workshop, Cambridge. Haberler, Gottfried. (1950). Joseph Alois Schumpeter, 1883-1950, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, (3), 333-372.
  12. Heilbroner, Robert. (1990). Analysis and Vision in the History of Modern EconomicThought, Journal of Economic Literature, 28, 1097-1114.
  13. Heilbroner, Robert; Milberg, William. (1995). The Crisis of Vision in Modern Economic Thought, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.
  14. Hutchison, Terence W. (1953). Aufsatze zur Ökonomischen Theorie, by J. A. Schumpeter, The Economic Journal, 63, (249), 124-126.
  15. Klappholz, Kurt; Agassi, Joseph. (1959). Methodological Prescriptions in Economics, Economica, 26, (101), 60-74.
  16. Klappholz, Kurt; Agassi, Joseph (1960). [Methodological Prescriptions in Economics]: A Rejoinder, Economica, 27, (106), 160-161.
  17. Kuhn, Thomas S. (1962). The Structure of Scientific Revolutions, Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
  18. Lachmann, Ludwig M. (1976). From Mises to Shackle: An Essay on Austrian Economics and the Kaleidoscopic Society, Journal of Economic Literature, 14, (1), 54-62.
  19. Latsis, Spiro J. (1972).
  20. Situational Determinism in Economics, The British Journalfor the Philosophy of Science, 23, (3), 207-245.
  21. Machlup, Fritz. (1943). Capitalism and its Future Appraised by Two Liberal Economists, American