Journals / Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2

A Note on the Influence of Friedrich Nietzsche on the Economic Thought of Joseph A. Schumpeter

Friedrich Nietzsche'nin Joseph A. Schumpeter'in İktisat Düşüncesi Üzerindeki Etkisine Dair Bir Not

Pages
197–212
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Despite the untestable character of some Schumpeterian analytical propositions, like the obsolescence of the entrepreneur or the danger of the decline of capitalism, we could have tolerance towards them in a rationally justified manner.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The more original and provocative these which Joseph A.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Schumpeter (1883-1950) developed in his work is that an heroic individual, the creative entrepreneur is the innovator of the dynamic economic system.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Despite the untestable character of some Schumpeterian analytical propositions, like the obsolescence of the entrepreneur or the danger of the decline of capitalism, we could have tolerance towards them in a rationally justified manner.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The more original and provocative these which Joseph A. Schumpeter (1883-1950) developed in his work is that an heroic individual, the creative entrepreneur is the innovator of the dynamic economic system. This is the greatest personality who introduces new abilities to the productive forces of the economy. In this context, Nietzsche's thoughts have many similarities with those of Schumpeter's. On the other hand, there is a Nietzschean creative element in the vision of Schumpeter. As time passed, this element has been transformed into a more coherent analytical proposition to understand the very nature of the economic phenomenon. Despite the untestable character of some Schumpeterian analytical propositions, like the obsolescence of the entrepreneur or the danger of the decline of capitalism, we could have tolerance towards them in a rationally justified manner.

Özet

Joseph A. Schumpeter (1883-1950) tarafından eserlerinde ortaya konulan en özgün ve iddialı fikir, bir kahramanın, yaratıcı girişimcinin, dinamik iktisadî yapının öncüsü olmasıdır. Bu mükemmel insan iktisadın üretici güçlerine yeni olanaklar sağlamaktadır. Bu bağlamda, Nietzsche'nin görüşlerinin Schumpeter'inkiler ile çok sayıda benzerliği vardır. Diğer taraftan, Schumpeter'in vizyonunda Nietzsche'nin tanımladığı anlamda bir yaratıcı unsur da bulunmaktadır. Zamanla bu unsur, iktisadî olgunun gerçek doğasını anlamaya yönelik, daha tutarlı analitik bir önermeye dönüşmüştür. Dolayısıyla, Schumpeter'in girişimcinin önem yitirmesi veya kapitalizmin çöküşü gibi bazı analitik önermelerine, test edilemeyen karakterlerine rağmen, rasyonelleştirilmeleri kaydıyla hoşgörü gösterilebilir.

🔖

Cite This Article

KIZILKAYA, E. İ. (2004). A Note on the Influence of Friedrich Nietzsche on the Economic Thought of Joseph A. Schumpeter. Doğuş Üniversitesi Dergisi, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 2, 197–212. https://ajindex.com/articles/132022

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (19)

  1. AKTAY, Y. (2003) İktidarın Nesnesi ve Kaynağı Olarak Beden ve Kimlik Politikaları: Kamusal Alan Tartışmalarına Bir Dipnot, Sivil Toplum Düşünce ve Araştırma Dergisi, 1, (2), 17-23.
  2. ANDERSEN, E. S. (1991a) Schumpeter's Vienna and The Schools of Thought, Smaskrift, (70), Institute for Production, University of Aalborg, Aalborg. ANDERSEN, E. S. (1991b) Statics and Development: A First Approximation to Schumpeter's Evolutionary Vision, Smaskrift, (71), Institute for Production, University of Aalborg, Aalborg. BACKHAUS, J. (2002) "The Economy as a Whole": The Seventh Chapter of Schumpeter's The Theory of Economic Development, Industry and Innovation, 9, (1/2), 91-92.
  3. BROUWER, M. T. (2002)
  4. Weber, Schumpeter and Knight on Entrepreneurship and Economic Development, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 12, (1), 83-105.
  5. CAELDRIES, F. (1993) On the Sustainability of the Capitalist Order: Schumpeter's Capitalism, Socialism and Democracy Revisited, Journal of Socio-economics,22, (3), 163-186.
  6. CHALK, A. F. (1958) Schumpeter's Views on the Relationship of Philosophy and Economics, Southern Economic Journal, 24, (January), 271-282.
  7. CONWAY, D. W. (1995) Returning to Nature: Nietzsche's Götterdammerung, Nietzsche: A Critical Reader, 31-52, ed. Peter R. Sedgwick, Oxford, Blackwell Publishers Ltd. COŞAR, M. (2001)
  8. Nietzsche, Kavramada Yeni Bir Yol, Ankara, ODTÜ Geliştirme Vakfı Yayıncılık. EBNER, A. (2000) Schumpeter and the 'Schmollerprogramm': Integrating Theory and History in the Analysis of Economic Development, Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 10, (3), 355-372.
  9. GOTTLIEB, M. (1959), The Ideological Influence in Schumpeter's Thought, Zeitschrift für Nationalökonomie, 19, (January), 1-42.
  10. HABERLER, G. (1950) Joseph Alois Schumpeter 1883-1950, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 64, (3), 333-372.
  11. KAHVECİ, K. (2003) Nietzsche Felsefesinde Hakikatin Estetize Edilmesi, Uludağ Üniversitesi Fen Edebiyat Fakültesi Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 4, (4), 33-41.
  12. LEONTIEF, W. (1950) Joseph A. Schumpeter (1883-1950), Econometrica, 18, (2), 103-110.
  13. MOLES, A. (1993) Belirsizin Bilimleri: İnsan Bilimleri İçin Yeni Bir Epistemoloji,(Çev. N. BİLGİN), İstanbul,
  14. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  15. NIETZSCHE, F. (2002) Böyle Buyurdu Zerdüşt, (Çev. A. T. OFLAZOĞLU), İstanbul,
  16. Cem Yayınevi.
  17. NIETZSCHE, F. (2003) Müziğin Ruhundan Tragedyanın Doğuşu, (Çev. İ. Z.EYÜBOĞLU), 6. baskı, İstanbul,
  18. Say Yayınları.
  19. PEUXERT, H. (2002) Schumpeter's "Lost" Seventh Chapter: A Critical Overview, Industry and Innovation^, (1/2), 79-89.