SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2018 / Sayı: 17

THE EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGİCAL CONTRACT BREACH ON INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR: THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SILENCE: AN APPLICATION FOR DEFENSE INDUSTRY

PSİKOLOJİK SÖZLEŞME İHLALİNİN YENİLİKÇİ DAVRANIŞA ETKİSİ: ÖRGÜTSEL SESSİZLİĞİN ROLÜ: SAVUNMA SANYİİNDE BİR UYGULAMA

Kemal KÖKSAL
Kemal EROĞLUER
Hakan YAPAR
Pages
687–696
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The result showed that psychological contract breach has negative effect on the innovative work behavior and organizational silence has the mediating role in the relationship between psychological contract breach and innovative work behavior.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Innovative behavior refers to behaviors that involve the production and implementation of new ideas at workplace.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Survey data were collected from a sample of 213 employees from two firms in defense industry.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The result showed that psychological contract breach has negative effect on the innovative work behavior and organizational silence has the mediating role in the relationship between psychological contract breach and innovative work behavior.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Psikolojik Sözleşme İhlali · Yenilikçi Davranış · Örgütsel Sessizlik

Abstract

Innovative behavior refers to behaviors that involve the production and implementation of new ideas at workplace. Psychological contract is an important determinant of employee behavior. A perception of the psychological contract breach may lead to negative attitudes and behaviors. Employees may behave silently because of the psychological and security concerns in case of violation of the psychological contract breach. The aim of this study is to examine the effect of psychological contract breach on the innovative work behavior and the mediating role of organizational silence in this relationship. Survey data were collected from a sample of 213 employees from two firms in defense industry. Confirmatory factor analysis is conducted for testing scale validity; correlation and regression analyses are applied for testing the relationship and mediating effect respectively. The result showed that psychological contract breach has negative effect on the innovative work behavior and organizational silence has the mediating role in the relationship between psychological contract breach and innovative work behavior.

Özet

Yenilikçi davranış, işyerinde ürün ve uygulamalara ilişkin yeni fikirlerin üretilmesi olarak tanımlanabilir. Psikolojik sözleşme ise çalışan davranışlarının önemli bir belirleyicisidir. Psikolojik sözleşmenin ihlaline yönelik bir algı, çalışanlarda olumsuz tutum ve davranışlara neden olabilmektedir. Çalışanların psikolojik sözleşmelerinin ihlal edildiğine yönelik algıları, psikolojik ve güvenliğe ilişkin endişelerinden dolayı sessiz kalmalarına neden olmaktadır. Bu çalışmanın amacı, psikolojik sözleşme ihlalinin yenilikçi davranışa etkisi ve bu ilişkide örgütsel sessizliğin aracılık rolünü incelemektir. Araştırma verileri, savunma sanayiinde faaliyet gösteren iki farklı firmada çalışan toplam 213 kişiden elde edilmiştir. Ölçeklerin yapı geçerliliği doğrulayıcı faktör analiziyle; değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler ve aracılık etkisi korelasyon ve regresyon analiziyle incelenmiştir. Analiz sonuçları psikolojik sözleşme ihlalinin çalışanların yenilikçi davranışını olumsuz olarak etkilediğini ve örgütsel sessizliğin bu ilişkide tam aracılık etkisine sahip olduğunu göstermektedir. Araştırma bulgularının uygulamaları ve gelecekte yapılabilecek çalışmalar için öneriler tartışılmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÖKSAL, K., EROĞLUER, K., YAPAR, H. (2018). THE EFFECT OF PSYCHOLOGİCAL CONTRACT BREACH ON INNOVATIVE WORK BEHAVIOR: THE ROLE OF ORGANIZATIONAL SILENCE: AN APPLICATION FOR DEFENSE INDUSTRY. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 17, 687–696. https://ajindex.com/articles/322544

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Argyris, C. ve Schön, D. (1978). Organizational learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading MA: Addison-Wesley. Bal, P. M., De Lange, A. H., Jansen, P. G. ve Van Der Veld, M. E. (2008). Psychological contract breach and job attitudes: A meta- analysis of age as a moderator. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 72, 143–158.
  2. Banbury, C. ve Mitchell, W. (1995). The Effect of Introducing Important Incremental Innovations on Market Share and Business Survival. Strategic Management Journal, 16, 161-182.
  3. Blau, P. (1964). Exchange and power in social life. New York: Wiley. Chang, H., Hsu, H., Liou, J. ve Tsai, C. (2013). Psychological contracts and innovative behavior: A moderated path analysis of work engagement and job resources. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 43, 2120–2135.
  4. Çakıcı, A. (2010). Örgütlerde İşgören Sessizliği: Neden Sessiz Kalmayı Tercih Ediyoruz? Ankara:
  5. Detay Yayıncılık. Fuller, J., Marler, L. ve Hester, K. (2006). Promoting Felt Responsibility for Constructive Change and Proactive Behavior: Exploring Aspects of an Elaborate Model of Work Design. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 27(8), 1089-1120.
  6. Hamel, G. (2000). Waking up IBM. Harvard Business Review, 78(4), 137-146.
  7. Hanif, F. ve Khan, M. (2016). Linking Psychological Contract and Innovative Work Behavior, moderated path analysis of Organizational Resources and mediated role of Work Engagement. Proceedings of 2nd International Multi-Disciplinary Conference, (s. 1-11).
  8. Gujrat. Hayes, A. (2013). An introduction to mediation, moderation, and conditional process analysis: A regression-based approach. New York: Guilford. Hayes, A. F. ve Matthes, J. (2009). Computational procedures for probing interactions in OLS and logistic regression: SPSS and SAS implementations. Behavior Research Methods, 41, 924–936.
  9. Henriksen, K. ve Dayton, E. (2006). Organizational silence and hidden threats to patient safety. He-alth Services Research, 41, 1539–1554.
  10. Hirschman, A. O. (1970).
  11. Exit, Voice, and Loyalty: Responses to Decline in Firms, Organizations, and States. Cambridge: MA: Harvard University Press.
  12. Janssen, O. (2000).
  13. Job Demands, Perceptions of Effort-Reward Fairness and Innovative Work Behaviour. Journal of Occuptional and Organizational Psychology, 73(3), 287-302.
  14. Jong, J. P. (2007). Individual innovation: The connection between leadership and employees’ innovative work behavior. Amsterdam: Zoetermeer: EIM. Kahn, W. A. (1990). Psychological conditions of personal engagement and disengagement at