SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2019 / Sayı: 24

THE MODERATING EFFECT OF POWER DISTANCE ON ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND ORGANİZATIONAL CYNICISM

ÖRGÜTSEL ADALET VE ÖRGÜTSEL SİNİZM ARASINDAKİ İLİŞKİDE GÜÇ MESAFESİNİN DÜZENLEYİCİ ETKİS

Ali ACARAY
Pages
197–214
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Research results covered up that distributive justice had a negative effect on affective and behavioral cynicism; interactional justice had a negative effect on cognitive, affective and behavioral cynicism; power distance had a moderator effect on the relationship between interactional justice and behavioral cynicism.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The main purpose of current study is to examine the relationship between organizational justice and organizational cynicism and the moderating effect of power distance on this relationship.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The data of the study were collected from 255 employees working in the banking sector with the questionnaire.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Research results covered up that distributive justice had a negative effect on affective and behavioral cynicism; interactional justice had a negative effect on cognitive, affective and behavioral cynicism; power distance had a moderator effect on the relationship between interactional justice and behavioral cynicism.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The main purpose of current study is to examine the relationship between organizational justice and organizational cynicism and the moderating effect of power distance on this relationship. The data of the study were collected from 255 employees working in the banking sector with the questionnaire. The hypotheses were tested with structural equation model. Research results covered up that distributive justice had a negative effect on affective and behavioral cynicism; interactional justice had a negative effect on cognitive, affective and behavioral cynicism; power distance had a moderator effect on the relationship between interactional justice and behavioral cynicism.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın temel amacı, çalışanların örgütsel adalet algılamaları ile örgütsel sinizm tutumları arasındaki ilişkinin ve bu ilişkide güç mesafesinin düzenleyici etkisinin incelenmesidir. Araştırmanın verileri anket soru formu ile bankacılık sektöründe çalışan 255 işgörenden toplanmıştır. Değişkenler arasındaki ilişkiler yapısal eşitlik modellemesi ile analiz edilmiştir. Araştırmanın sonuçları; dağıtımsal adaletin duyuşsal ve davranışsal sinizmi ve etkileşim adaletinin bilişsel, duyuşsal ve davranışsal sinizmi negatif etkilediğini; güç mesafesinin etkileşim adaleti ile davranışsal sinizm arasındaki ilişkide düzenleyici bir etkiye sahip olduğunu ortaya koymuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

ACARAY, A. (2019). THE MODERATING EFFECT OF POWER DISTANCE ON ORGANIZATIONAL JUSTICE AND ORGANİZATIONAL CYNICISM. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 24, 197–214. https://ajindex.com/articles/322346

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abraham, R. (2000). Organizational Cynicism: Bases and Consequences. Generic, Social and General Psychology Monographs, 126(3), 269-292.
  2. Adams, J. S. (1963). Toward an Understanding of Inequity. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 67, 422-436.
  3. Adams, J. S. (1965). Inequity in Social Exchange. (Advances in Experimental Social Psychology Ed.: Berkowitz, L.), New York: Academic Press, 267-299.
  4. Aiken, L. ve West, S. (1991). Multiple Regression: Testing And Interpreting Interactions. California: Sage Publication. Akyol, Ş. (2009). Örgüt Kültüründe Güç Mesafesi ve Liderlik İlişkisi. (Yayımlanmamış Doktora Tezi). Marmara Üniversitesi SBE, İstanbul.
  5. Andersson, L. M. (1996). Employee Cynicism: An Examination Using A Contract Violation Framework. Human Relations, 49(11), 1395-1418.
  6. Andersson, L. M. ve Bateman, T. S. (1997). Cynicism in the Workplace: Some Causes and Effects. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 18, 449-469.
  7. Arabacı, B. (2010). The Effects of Depersonalization and Organizational Cynicism Levels on the Job Satisfaction of Educational Inspectors. African Journal of Business Management, 4(13), 2802-2811.
  8. Bedeian, A. G. (2007). Even if the Tower Is “Ivory,” It Isn’t “White:” Understanding the Consequences of Faculty Cynicism. Academy of Management Learning and Education, 6(1), 9-32.
  9. Bernerth, J. B., Armenakis, A. A., Feild, H. S. ve Walker, H. J. (2007).
  10. Justice, Cynicism, and Commitment: A Study of Important Organizational Change Variables. Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 43, 303-326.
  11. Blader, S. L., Chang, C. C. ve Tyler, T. R. (2001). Procedural Justice and Retaliation in Organizations: Comparing cross-nationally the Importance of Fair Group Processes. The International Journal of Conflict Management, 4, 295-311.
  12. Blau, P. M. (1964). Justice in Social Exhange. Sociological Inquiry, 34(2), 193-206.
  13. Bond, M.H., Wan, K.C., Leung, K., ve Giacalone, R. A. (1985). How are Responses to Verbal Insults Related to Cultural Collectivism?. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psycology, 16, 111-127.
  14. Bosora, J. F. C. (2014). The Moderating Effect of Power Distance on the Relationship between Organizational Justice and Counterproductive Work Behavior. (Unpublished Master of Science Dissertation). Purdue University, Indiana. Brandes, P. (1997). Organizational Cynicism: Its Nature, Antecedents, and Consequences. Doctoral Dissertation, Available from ProOuest Dissertations and Theses database. Cartwright, S. ve Holmes, N. (2006). The Meaning of Work: The Challenge of