SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika / 2015 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 43

VIABILI TY OF THE NORM OF ‘RESP ONSIBILI TY TO PROTECT’ WI THIN THE CON TEX T OF THE CRISES IN LIBYA AND SYRIA

KORUMA SORUMLULUĞU' NORMUNUN LİBYA VE SURİYE KRİZLERİ BAĞLAMINDA İŞLEVSELLİĞİ

Tuba ELDEM
Pages
1–38
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Taking the increasing controversy over the norm’s implementation into consideration, this article, considering R2P as an emerg ing interna- tional moral norm, arg ues that desp ite the loss of credibility of R2P due to the widesp read p ercep tion of its abuse by the coalition f orces in Libya, the norm sustains its viability within international society at large.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In the p ost-Cold War era, the rise of international military interven- tions f or humanitarian ends has raised several imp ortant questions about the rights and resp onsibilities of sovereign states towards their citizens as well as towards international society as a whole.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The doct- rine of Resp onsibility to Protect (R2P) was develop ed as a resp onse to these questions by the ICISS (International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty) in 2001 and was later unanimously adop ted at the UN General Assembly meeting of 2005 and ratif ied by the UN Secu- rity Council in 2006.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Taking the increasing controversy over the norm’s implementation into consideration, this article, considering R2P as an emerg ing interna- tional moral norm, arg ues that desp ite the loss of credibility of R2P due to the widesp read p ercep tion of its abuse by the coalition f orces in Libya, the norm sustains its viability within international society at large.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In the p ost-Cold War era, the rise of international military interven- tions f or humanitarian ends has raised several imp ortant questions about the rights and resp onsibilities of sovereign states towards their citizens as well as towards international society as a whole. The doct- rine of Resp onsibility to Protect (R2P) was develop ed as a resp onse to these questions by the ICISS (International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignty) in 2001 and was later unanimously adop ted at the UN General Assembly meeting of 2005 and ratif ied by the UN Secu- rity Council in 2006. The doctrine was implemented op erationally f or the f irst time in Libya f ollowing UN Security Council Resolution 1973 (2011). The f ailure of international society to f ollow a similar p olicy in Syria, however, has g iven rise to criticism over the viability of the doct- rine. Taking the increasing controversy over the norm’s implementation into consideration, this article, considering R2P as an emerg ing interna- tional moral norm, arg ues that desp ite the loss of credibility of R2P due to the widesp read p ercep tion of its abuse by the coalition f orces in Libya, the norm sustains its viability within international society at large.

Özet

Soğ uk Savaş sonrası insani gerekçelerle yap ılan uluslararası askeri mü- dahalelerin artması; devletlerin egemenlik haklarının sınırlarının ne olduğ u, hem vatandaşlarına hem de uluslararası topluma karşı birta- kım evrensel sorumlulukları olup olmadığ ı ve bu sorumlulukların neyi kapsadığ ı sorularını da beraberinde getirmiştir. 2001 yılında Kanada Hükümeti’nin inisiyatif iyle kurulan Müdahale ve Devlet Egemenliğ i U- luslararası Komisyonu (International Commission on Intervention and State Sovereignity, ICISS) taraf ından bu sorulara cevap olarak gelişti- rilen koruma sorumluluğ u (the resp onsibility to p rotect, R2P) doktrini- nin 2005 yılında Birleşmiş Milletler (BM) Genel Kurulu’nda oybirliğ i ile kabul edilmesi, doktrinin normatif kabulünü göstermesi açısından anlamlıdır. Doktrinin op erasyonel boyutta işlevsellik kazanması, BM Güvenlik Konseyi’nin (BMGK) Libya’ya yönelik benimsediğ i 1973 sayılı Karar ile olmuşsa da, insani mezalimin daha ağ ır boyutlarda yaşandı- ğ ı Suriye’de benzer bir p olitikanın izlenmemesi; doktrinin etik bir norm olmaktan ziyade devletler taraf ından seçici olarak kullanılan bir araç olduğ u yönündeki eleştirileri arttırmıştır. Bu makale, üzerinde tartış- maların artarak sürdüğ ü R2P doktrinini gelişmekte olan bir uluslara- rası etik normu olarak ele alarak Libya ve Suriye krizlerindeki rolünü değerlendirecek ve Libya’da R2P’nin koalisyon g üçleri taraf ından suisti- mal edildiğ i alg ısı R2P’yi kredibilite kaybına uğ ratmış olsa da, şüphecilerin aksine, normun uluslararası toplumda geçerliliğ ini koruduğ unu savunacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ELDEM, T. (2015). VIABILI TY OF THE NORM OF ‘RESP ONSIBILI TY TO PROTECT’ WI THIN THE CON TEX T OF THE CRISES IN LIBYA AND SYRIA. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 43, 1–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/322194

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Abramowitz, Michael, "Does the United States Have a 'Responsibility to Protect' the Syrian People", The Washing ton Post, 6 Eylül 2013.
  2. Acharya, Amitav, "How Ideas Spread: Whose Norms Matter?" International Organi- zation, Cilt: 58, Sayı: 2, 2004.
  3. Adler-Nissen, Rebecca ve Vincent Pouliot, "Power in Practice: Negotiating the Inter- national Intervention in Libya", Europ ean Journal of International Relations, Cilt: 20, Sayı: 4, 2014.
  4. Annan, Kofi, "Two Concepts of Sovereignty", The Economist, 16 Eylül 1999. "Arab League Votes to Suspend Syria Over Crackdown", The New York Times, 12 Kasım 2011.
  5. Axworthy, Lloyd, "In Libya, We Move Toward a More Humane World", Globe and Mail, 23 Ağustos 2011.
  6. Aydın, Umut, "Uluslararası İş Birliğini Yeniden Düşünmek: Rekabet Politikasında Düzenleyici Ağlar Örneği", Uluslararası İlişkiler, Cilt: 8, Sayı: 30, 2011. "A More Secure World: Our Shared Responsibility", Report of the High-Level Panel on Threats, Challenges and Change, UN General Assembly, A/59/565, 2 Aralık 2004.
  7. Bass, Gary, Freedom's Battle: The Orig ins of Humanitarian Intervention, (New York: Vintage, 2008).
  8. Beauchamp, Zack, "Syria's Crisis and the Future of R2P", Foreign Policy, 16 Mart 2012.
  9. Bellamy, J. Alex ve Paul D. Williams, "The New Politics of Protection? Cote d'Ivoire, Libya and the Responsibility to Protect", International Aff airs, Cilt: 87, Sayı: 4, 2011.
  10. Bellamy, J., Alex, "Libyan Case a Red Herring in Syria Dilemma", The Global Observa- tory, 13 Ocak 2014.
  11. Bricmont, Jean, Humanitarian Imp erialism: Using Human Rights to Sell War, (New York: Monthly Review Press, 2006).
  12. Burke-White, W. William, "Adoption of the Responsibility to Protect", içinde Jared Genser ve Irwin Cotler, The Resp onsibility To Protect: The Promise Of Stopp ing Mass Atrocities In Our Time, (New York: Oxford University Press, 2012).
  13. Bush, Ray, Guiliano Martiniello ve Claire Mercer, "Humanitarian Imperialism", Review of Af rican Political Economy, Cilt: 38, Sayı:129, 2011.
  14. Chomsky, Noam, "Humanitarian Imperialism: The New Doctrine of Imperial Right", Monthly Review, Eylül 2008.
  15. Cohen, Roberta ve M. Francis Deng, Masses in Flight: The Global Crisis of Internal Displacement, (Washington, DC: The Brookings Institution, 1998).
  16. Cook, A. Steven, "Could a Syrian Intervention Work?", The Atlantic, 2 Mart 2012.
  17. Cook, A. Steven, "It's Time to Think Seriously About Intervening in Syria", The Atlan- tic, 17 Ocak 2012.
  18. Cunliffe, Philip (Der.), Critical Persp ectives on the Resp onsibility to Protect