SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika / 2012 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 29

Türkiye’de uluslararası ilişkiler çalışmaları: Teorik düşünceler

International relations studies in Turkey: Theoretical considerations .

ZEHRA NİLÜFER KARACASULU
Pages
143–160
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It concludes that theoretical studies in Turkey are weak due to institutional and cultural conditions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this article is to examine the unique disciplinary history of International Relations (IR) in Turkey.
📊
Key Findings & Data:It aspires to contribute to the previous scholarship by presenting significance of theoretical considerations in a historical perspective, in relation to the Western theoretical developments.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It concludes that theoretical studies in Turkey are weak due to institutional and cultural conditions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The aim of this article is to examine the unique disciplinary history of International Relations (IR) in Turkey. It aspires to contribute to the previous scholarship by presenting significance of theoretical considerations in a historical perspective, in relation to the Western theoretical developments. Also, it explains impact of cultural and institutional factors on development of international relations theorizing. It concludes that theoretical studies in Turkey are weak due to institutional and cultural conditions.

🔖

Cite This Article

KARACASULU, Z. N. (2012). Türkiye’de uluslararası ilişkiler çalışmaları: Teorik düşünceler. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 29, 143–160. https://ajindex.com/articles/322094

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Acharya, Amitav ve Barry Buzan, “Why There is No Non-Western International Relations Theory?”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2007, p. 287-312.
  2. Acharya, Amitav ve Barry Buzan, “On the Possibility of a Non-Western IR Theory in Asia”, International Relations of the Asia-Pacific, Vol. 7, No. 3, 2007, p. 427-438.
  3. Acharya, Amitav ve Barry Buzan, (ed.), Non-Western International Relations Theory Perspectives on and Beyond Asia, (London: Routledge, 2010).
  4. Adigbuo, Richard, ‘Beyond the Theories: The Case for National Role Conceptions’, POLİTIKON, Vol. 34, No. 1, 2007, p. 83-97.
  5. Arı, Tayyar, Uluslararası İlişkiler ve Dış Politika, (Istanbul: Alfa, 1996)
  6. Arı, Tayyar, Uluslararası İlişkiler Teorileri, (Istanbul: Alfa, 2002).
  7. Arıboğan, Deniz Ülke, Uluslararası İlişkiler Düşüncesi, (Istanbul: Bahçeşehir Üniversitesi Yayınları, 2007).
  8. Arıboğan, Deniz Ülke. Globalleşme Senaryosunun Aktörleri: Uluslararası İlişkilerde Güç Mücadelesi, (D R Yayınları: Istanbul, 2001).
  9. Aydın, Mustafa ve Korhan Yazgan, “Türkiye’de Uluslararası İlişkiler Akademisyenleri Araştırması, Eğitim ve Displin Değerlendirmeleri Anketi, 2009”,
  10. Uluslararası İlişkiler Dergisi, Vol 17, No. 25, Bahar 2010, p. 3-42.
  11. Aydın, Mustafa ve Sinem A. Açıkmeşe, “Europenization through EU Conditionality: Understanding the New Era in Turkish Foreign Policy”, Journal of Balkan and Near Eastern Studies, Vol. 9, No. 3, 2007, p. 263-274.
  12. Aydınlı, Ersel, Erol Kurubaş ve Haluk Özdemir, Yöntem, Kuram, Komplo: Türk Uluslararası İlişkiler Disiplininde Vizyon Arayışları, (Ankara: Asil Yayın, 2009).
  13. Aydınlı, Ersel ve Julie Mathews, “Periphery Theorizing for a Truly Internationalized Discipline: Spinning IR Theory out of Anatolia”, Review of International Studies, Vol. 34, 2008, p. 693-712.
  14. Ayoob, Muhammed, “Inequality and Theorizing in International Relations: The Case for Subaltern Realism”, International Studies Review, Vol. 4, No. 3, Sonbahar 2002, p. 27- 48. Baç, Meltem Müftüler ve Yaprak Gürsoy, “Is There a Europeanization of Turkish Foreign Policy? An Addendum to the Literature on EU candidates”, Turkish Studies, Vol. 11, No. 3, 2010, p. 405-427.
  15. Bilge, A. Suat, Milletlerarası Politika, (Ankara: Sevinç Matbaası, 1966).
  16. Bilgin, Pınar ve Oktay Tanrısever, “A Telling Story of IR in the Periphery: Telling Turkey about the World, Telling the World about Turkey”, Journal of International Relations and Development, Vol. 12, No. 2, 2009, p. 174-179.
  17. Bilgin, Pınar, “Looking for the International Beyond th