Journals / Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika / 2013 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 35

The political economy of peace: Liberal theory of ınternational relations and commercial liberalism

Barışın ekonomi politiği: Uluslararası ilişkilerde liberal kuram ve ticari liberalizm

Pages
85–113
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lastly, a wide range of theoretical and empirical literature has been reviewed in order to account for the role of commercial liberalism in international political economy.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Political economic perspectives have been gaining ground in the discip- line of international relations with the rapid economic globalization.
📊
Key Findings & Data:There is a large body of research that demonstrates that trade reduces the likelihood of conflict.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lastly, a wide range of theoretical and empirical literature has been reviewed in order to account for the role of commercial liberalism in international political economy.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Political economic perspectives have been gaining ground in the discip- line of international relations with the rapid economic globalization. The relationship between trade and peace is also one of the controver- sial debates in political-economy. There is a large body of research that demonstrates that trade reduces the likelihood of conflict. This hypot- hesis, also called as commercial peace or commercial pacifism in aca- demia, is closely related to commercial liberalism that is one of the key components of liberal theories of international relations. After a survey of the historical evolution of the liberal economic/politic order in world politics, this study presents the main theoretical tenets of liberalism in international relations. In addition to this, this paper analyzes different branches of liberalisms with a specific reference to commercial liberalism. Lastly, a wide range of theoretical and empirical literature has been reviewed in order to account for the role of commercial liberalism in international political economy.

Özet

Yaşanan hızlı ekonomik küreselleşme ile uluslararası ilişkiler disiplinin- de ekonomi-politik yaklaşımlar önem kazanmıştır. Ticaret ve barış ara- sındaki ilişkiyi inceleyen analizler de yine bu kapsamda, ekonomi-poli- tik bir çerçevede ele alınmaktadır. Yapılan pek çok çalışma, ticaretin ça- tışma olasılığını düşürdüğünün altını çizmektedir. Akademik çevrelerde bu hipotez ticari barış veya ticari pasifizm olarak adlandırılmakta ve ticari liberalizm başlığı altında değerlendirilmektedir. Liberal uluslara- rası ilişkiler kuramlarıyla yakından ilgili olan ticari liberalizm tarihsel, teorik ve görgül olarak zengin bir arka plana sahiptir. Bu çalışma kapsamında öncelikle dünya politikasında önemli bir yer teşkil eden liberal ekonomik/siyasal düzenin tarihsel gelişimi incelenmekte ve ardından uluslararası ilişkilerde liberal kuramın temel varsayımları ortaya konulmaktadır. Son kısımda ise yapılan okumalar çerçevesinde ticari liberalizm başta olmak üzere liberalizm çatısı altındaki farklı yaklaşımlara değinilmekte ve ticaret-barış ilişkisinde ticari liberalizmin oynadığı rol, konuyla ilgili teorik ve görgül literatür dikkate alınarak ayrıntılı biçimde analiz edilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZŞAHİN, M. C. (2013). The political economy of peace: Liberal theory of ınternational relations and commercial liberalism. Uluslararası Hukuk ve Politika, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 35, 85–113. https://ajindex.com/articles/322037

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Arad, Ruth W. ve Seev Hirsch, “Peacemaking and Vested Interests: International Eco- nomic Transactions”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 2, No. 5, 1981, s. 439-68.
  2. Axelrod, Robert, The Evolution of Cooperation, (New York: Basic Books, 1985).
  3. Baldwin, David A., “Neoliberalism, Neorealism, and World Politics”, içinde David A. Baldwin, der. Neorealism and Neoliberalism: The Contemporary Debate, (New York: Columbia University, 1993).
  4. Barbieri, Katherine, “Economic Interdependence: A Path to Peace or a Source of Inter- national Conflict?”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 33, No. 1, 1996, s. 29–49.
  5. Barbieri, Katherine ve Gerald Schneider, “Globalization and Peace: Assessing New Di- rections in the Study of Trade and Conflict”, Journal of Peace Research, Vol. 36, No. 4, 1999, s. 387–404.
  6. Barbieri, Katherine, The Liberal Illusion: Does Trade Promote Peace?, (Ann Arbor: University of Michigan Press, 2002).
  7. Bearce, David H., “Grasping the Commercial Institutional Peace”, International Studies Quarterly, Vol. 47, No. 3, September 2003, s. 347-70.
  8. Beck, Nathaniel, Jonathan N Katz ve Richard Tucker, “Taking Time Seriously in Binary Time-Series Cross-Section Analysis”, American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 42, No. 4, 1998, s. 1260-288. Bennett D. Scott ve Allan C. Stam, “Research Design and EStimator Choices in the Analysis of Interstate Dyads: When Decisions Matter”, Journal of Conflict Re- search, Vol. 44, No. 5, 2000, s. 653-85. Bhagwati Jagdish, “Globalization, Sovereignty and Democracy”, içinde Axel Hadenius, der., Democracy’s Victory and Crisis: Nobel Symposium, (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1994).
  9. Biersteker, Thomas J., “The “Triumph” of Neoclassical Economics in the Develop- ing World: Policy Convergence and Bases of Governance in the International Eco- nomic Order”, içinde James N. Rosenau ve Ernst-Otto Czempiel, der., Governance without Government: Order and Change in World Politics, (Cambrigde: Cambridge University Press, 1992), s. 102-31.
  10. Blanchard, Jean-Marc F., Edward D. Mansfield, “The Political Economy of National Se- curity: Economic Statecraft, Interdependence and International Conflict”, Security Studies, Vol. 9, No. 1-2, 1999, s. 1-14.
  11. Booth, Ken, “Security in Anarchy: Utopian Realism in Theory and Practice”, Interna- tional Affairs, Vol. 67, No. 3, July, 1991, s. 527-45.
  12. Brown, Chris ve Kirsten Ainley, Understanding International Relations, (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2005). Burchill Scott, “Liberalism”, içinde Scott Burchi