Journals / Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences / 2021 / Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1

Analysis of Opinions and Expectations of Farmers in Efeler District of Aydın Province on the Effects of Urbanization

Pages
33–38
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

According to the results of the research, the average age of the farmers is 54.97 years and the average education period is 7.68 years.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The aim of this study is to determine the opinions and expectations of the farmers on the effects of urbanization on agriculture in Efeler district of Aydın province.
📊
Key Findings & Data:For this purpose, six of the villages that have gained the status of neighborhoods, which are around 10 km from the city center, have been selected for purpose.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:According to the results of the research, the average age of the farmers is 54.97 years and the average education period is 7.68 years.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

The aim of this study is to determine the opinions and expectations of the farmers on the effects of urbanization on agriculture in Efeler district of Aydın province. For this purpose, six of the villages that have gained the status of neighborhoods, which are around 10 km from the city center, have been selected for purpose. The data of the research was compiled by proportional sampling and survey method from 73 farmers. In the analysis of the research data, firstly the socio-economic characteristics of the farmers were examined and then the opinions and expectations of the farmers about the effects of urbanization on agriculture were revealed. Five-point Likert scale was used in the analysis of opinions and expectations. According to the results of the research, the average age of the farmers is 54.97 years and the average education period is 7.68 years. The average land size of the farmers is 73.01 decares and the average number of parcels is 3.42. When the farmers are asked about the changes and expectations of urbanization; 68.49% thought that their agricultural production was not affected at all, 91.78% thought that their agricultural income never changed, 80.82% thought that the agricultural land sales frequency increased, 95.89% thought that the agricultural land prices increased, 64.38% thought that urbanization could not prevent migration, 58.90% thought that urbanization may affect young farmers negatively. In Turkey, urbanization policies and other regulations should not adversely affect the agricultural structure and should be arranged in a way that does not exclude farmers from agriculture

🔖

Cite This Article

CANER, C. B., ENGİNDENİZ, S. (2021). Analysis of Opinions and Expectations of Farmers in Efeler District of Aydın Province on the Effects of Urbanization. Selcuk Journal of Agriculture and Food Sciences, Cilt: 35 - Sayı: 1, 33–38. https://ajindex.com/articles/319772

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Akseki H, Meşhur MÇ, (2013). An analysis of the Konya’s urbanized fertile agricultural lands and urban sprawl, Journal of Megaron 8: 165-174.
  2. Aksoy E, Özsoy G, (2001). Determination of losses of agricultural lands by industry and urban settlement in Bursa city and its near environment by using GIS techniques, causes and solutions. GAP II. Agriculture Congress, 24-26 October 2001, Şanlıurfa, pp.1053-1060.
  3. Alhan F (1992). Positive and negative effects of urbanization activities continued within the boundaries of Tokat central district on land use. Master Thesis, Institute of Science of Cumhuriyet University, Sivas. Bozdemir M, Bayramoğlu Z, Ağızan K, Ağızan S (2019). Prudential expectation analysis in maize production. Turkish Journal of Agriculture-Food Science and Technology 7: 390-400.
  4. Barlas S, Örmeci Kart, MÇ, Kınıklı F, Işın Ş (2019). Factors affecting the production decisions of cut flowers producers in Menderes Region of Izmir Province. Atatürk University Journal of the Agricutural Faculty 50: 231-238.
  5. Çelik K (2007). Problems brought by the opening of agricultural lands to urban land development. Chamber of Survey and Cadastre Engineers, 11. Turkey Scientific and Technical Conference, 2-6 April 2007,
  6. Ankara.
  7. Değer HC, Özder U, Kınıklı F, Yercan M (2020). Determining cooperative tendencies of tomato farmers on marketing in Muğla. Turkish Journal of Agricultural Economics 26(2):121-129.
  8. Deniz B, Tunçay HE, Küçükerbaş EV (2005). Determination of the land use change pattern: the case of city of Aydin. Turkey, X. European Ecological Congress, 8 November 2005,
  9. KusadasiTurkey. Erbaş MK (1989). Non-agricultural use of fertile rural lands in urbanization and industrialization process and the case of Bursa. Master Thesis, Institute of Science of Mimar Sinan Fine Arts University, Istanbul. Erdem Ü, Nurlu E, Yılmaz R, Kahraman İM (1999). An investigation on Aydın province area use decisions based on the Büyük Menderes basin. 4th Agriculture and Environmental Problems Symposium, 9-10 September 1999, Söke-Izmir, pp.49-57.
  10. Genç N (2014). Law no. 6360 and effects on Aydın. Journal of Social Sciences Institute of Adnan Menderes University 1: 1-29.
  11. Karakayacı Ö, Karakayacı Z (2012). Method proposal for determining urban/rural land value in urban sprawl area. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies 5: 107-120.
  12. Karataş N (2007). The effects of urban fringe trends in Izmir on the land ownership hand exchange process in Torbalı-Ayrancılar. Journal of Planning 40: