SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2004 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2

The State of Ethnicity With Respect to Modernity

Etnikliğin Modernite Karşısındaki Durumu

Meral SAĞIR
H. Serkan AKILLI
Pages
103–136
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Finally, we have focused on the transformations and consequences that challenge nation states, which have been brought about by the process of globalization.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The relationship between modernity and ethnicity can not be fully evaluated without signifying the conceptual constraints while paying attention to modernity's historical and political perspectives.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Therefore, we have first demonstrated the process in which the term ethnicity has gained its contemporary conceptual meaning analytically in a partially phenomenal manner.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Finally, we have focused on the transformations and consequences that challenge nation states, which have been brought about by the process of globalization.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The relationship between modernity and ethnicity can not be fully evaluated without signifying the conceptual constraints while paying attention to modernity's historical and political perspectives. Therefore, we have first demonstrated the process in which the term ethnicity has gained its contemporary conceptual meaning analytically in a partially phenomenal manner. Then, we have taken in hand the approaches of modern paradigms such as liberalism, republicanism and socialism about ethnicity; and we have discussed whether ethnicity constitutes a problem for the elements of language, education, citizenship, etc. which are embedded within the political subject of modern politics, the nation state. Finally, we have focused on the transformations and consequences that challenge nation states, which have been brought about by the process of globalization.

Özet

Modernitenin kavramsal sınırları, tarihsel ve politik perspektif de dikkate alınarak belirlenmeden etnisite ile ilişkisi değerlendirilemez. Bunun için burada önce, modernitenin bugünkü kavram içeriğine ulaşma süreci analitik ve kısmen olgusal olarak sunulmaktadır. Daha sonra, modern zamanların bakış açılan olarak liberal, cumhuriyetçi, sosyalist yaklaşımların etnisite olgusuna yaklaşımları ele alınmakta ve yine modern zamanların siyasal öznesi olan ulus devletin dil, eğitim, vatandaşlık vb. unsurları içinde etnisite olgusunun bir sorunsal olup olmadığı tartışılmaktadır. Son olarak, ulus-devletlerin konumunu sarsan küreselleşme sürecinin beraberinde getirdiği değişmeler ve sonuçlar üzerinde durulmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

SAĞIR, M., AKILLI, H. S. (2004). The State of Ethnicity With Respect to Modernity. Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 2, 103–136. https://ajindex.com/articles/314768

References (21)

  1. ALTHUSSER, Louis (2000) İdeoloji ve Devletin İdeolojik Aygıtları, (Çevirenler: Yusuf Alp ve Mahmut Özışık) İstanbul:
  2. İletişim Yayınları.
  3. BANTON, Micheal (2. Basım) (1997)
  4. Ethnic and Racial Conciousness, Longman. BANTON, Micheal (2000) "Ethnic Conflict", Sociology, Vol.: 34, No: 3. BONACICH, Edna (1980) "Class Approaches to Ethnicity and Race", Critical Sociology, Vol: 25, No: 2-3, pp. 166-194.
  5. CALHOUN, Craig (1993) "Nationalism and Ethnicity", Annual Review of Sociology, Vol: 19, pp. 211-240.
  6. CLAEYS, Gregory (2000) "The 'Survival of the Fittest' and the Origins of Social Darwinism"' Journal of the History of Ideas, No: 61, pp 223-40.
  7. CİRHİNLİOĞLU, Zafer (1998) "Modernleşme, PostModernizm ve Siyaset", Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt 1, Sayı 1-2, s. 60-85.
  8. COHEN, Robin (1999) "The Making of Ethnicity: A Modest Defence of Primordialism", Edward MORTIMER, in People, Nation, and State: The Meaning of Ethnicity and Nationalism, London: I. B. Publishers, pp. 3-11.
  9. CONNOLY, William E. (1988)
  10. Political Theory and Modernity, Oxford: Blackwell. CONNOR, Walker (1994) Ethnonationalism: The Quest for Understanding, Princeton: Princeton University Press ERIKSEN, Thomas Hyyland (1996) "Ethnicity, Race, Class and Nation", in J. HUTCHINSON ve Anthony D. SMITH(eds.), Ethnicity, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp. 28-33.
  11. ESMAN, Milton J. ve ITAMAR, Rabinovich (eds.) (1998)
  12. Ethnicity, Pluralism, and the State in the Middle East, London: Cornell University Press.
  13. EUROBAROMETER (2001) Attitudes towards Minority Groups in European Union, Vienna GELLNER, Ernest (1994) "Nationalism and Modernization", John HUTCHINSON and Anthony D. SMITH (eds.), in Nationalism, Oxford: Oxford University Press, pp.55-63.
  14. GIDDENS, Anthony (1994) Modernliğin Sonuçları, (Çev. Ersin Kuşdil), İstanbul:
  15. Ayrıntı Yayınları.
  16. GIORDANO, Christian (1997) "Affiliation, Exclusion and the National State, Ethnic Discourses and Minorities in East Central Europe", in Hans Rudolf WICKER (ed.) Rethinking Nationalism and Ethnicity, Berg, Oxford, pp. 175-192.
  17. GUDBERNAU, Montserrat (1997) "Marx and DufKheim on Nationalism", Hans Rudolf WICKER (ed.) Rethinking-*frationalism and Ethnicity, Berg, Oxford, pp. 73-90.
  18. HABERMAS, Jürgen (1990) The Philosophical Discourse of Modernity, Cambridge: Polity Press.
  19. HABERMAS, Jürgen (1994)
  20. Modernite, Postmodernizm: Jürgen Habermas, Fredrick Jameson, J.F. Lyotard, Istanbul: Kıyı Yayınları.
  21. HELLY, Denişe (2002) "Cultural Pluralism: An Overview of the Debate since the 60s", The Glob