Journals / Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi / 2017 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1

SOUTH AFRICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL WORK ON BOYS, MEN AND MASCULINITIES: TWO DECADES OF MASCULINITY RESEARCH POST FIRST DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS (1994 – 2011)

Pages
176–200
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Secondly, there is the work that focuses on performances of masculinities which draws primarily on current interdisciplinary research generated internationally and locally within the framework of critical men’s studies.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The research on masculinities in South Africa has grown rapidly over the last two decades.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This paper approaches South African psychology, through the vehicle of the two key journals, the South African Journal of Psychology (SAJP) and Psychology in Society (PINS) published from 1994 to 2011.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Secondly, there is the work that focuses on performances of masculinities which draws primarily on current interdisciplinary research generated internationally and locally within the framework of critical men’s studies.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Social Sciences · Psychology · South Africa

Özet

The research on masculinities in South Africa has grown rapidly over the last two decades. This paper is an attempt to review of theory and research on masculinities published in South Africa and unpacks the key foci of South African Psychology on masculinities and to analyse the dominant discourses inherent in these work. This paper approaches South African psychology, through the vehicle of the two key journals, the South African Journal of Psychology (SAJP) and Psychology in Society (PINS) published from 1994 to 2011. Our analysis suggests two clear streams of work looking at boys, men and masculinities in South African Psychology. Firstly, there are those that fall into the traditional paradigm of reproducing notions of an essentialised binarism of gender. Secondly, there is the work that focuses on performances of masculinities which draws primarily on current interdisciplinary research generated internationally and locally within the framework of critical men’s studies.

🔖

Cite This Article

POTGIETER, C., SHEFER, T., ZİYA, H. E. (2017). SOUTH AFRICAN PSYCHOLOGICAL WORK ON BOYS, MEN AND MASCULINITIES: TWO DECADES OF MASCULINITY RESEARCH POST FIRST DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS (1994 – 2011). Sosyoloji Araştırmaları Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 1, 176–200. https://ajindex.com/articles/314638

References (12)

  1. Blackbeard, D. & Lindegger, G. (2007). Building a Wall Around Themselves': Exploring Adolescent Masculinity and Abjection with Photo-Biographical Research. South African Journal of Psychology, 37 (1), 25-46.
  2. Bohan, J.S. (Ed.) (1992).
  3. Seldom Seen, Rarely Heard: Women’s Place in Psychology. Boulder, Colorado: Westview Press. *Boonzaier, F. & de la Rey, C. (2004). Woman Abuse: The Construction of Gender in Women and Men's Narratives of Violence. South African Journal of Psychology, 34 (3), 443-463. *Braine, J.D., & Bless, C. & Fox, P.M.C. (1995). How Do Students Perceive Sexual Harassment?: An Investigation on The University of Natal, Pietermaritzburg Campus. South African Journal of Psychology, 25 (3), 140-149.
  4. Butler, J. (1990). Gender Trouble: Feminism and the Subversion of Gender. London: Routledge. Butler, J. (1993). Bodies That Matter: On The Discursive Limits Of Sex. London: Routledge. Butler, J. (1994).
  5. Against Proper Objects, Differences. A Journal of Feminist Cultural Studies, 6 (2&3), 1–26.
  6. Butler, J. (2000). Critically Queer, in: P. Du Gay, J. Evans & P. Redman (Eds) Identity: A Reader. London: Sage/Open University Press.
  7. Butler, J. (2004).
  8. Gender Undone. Boca Raton, FL: Routledge Taylor and Francis. **Chadwick, R. & Foster, D. (2007). In Transition But Never Undone?: Contesting Masculinity. Psychology in Society, 35, 27-37.
  9. Chesler, P. (1972).
  10. Women and Madness. Garden City, New York: Doubleday. 4 * denotes articles from the South African Journal of Psychology (SAJP) ** denotes articles from Psychology in Society (PINS) South African Psychological Work on Boys, Men and Masculinities: Two Decades of Masculinity Research Post First Democratic Elections (1994 – 2011) Prof. Cheryl Potgieter Assoc. Prof. Hande Eslen-Ziya Prof. Tamara Shefer SAD / JSR Cilt / Volume 20 Sayı / Number 1 194 Connell, R.W. (1987).
  11. Gender and Power. Stanford, Ca: Stanford University Press.
  12. Connell, R.W. (2005). Masculinities (2nd ed.). California: University of California Press. **Cooper, A. (2009). "Gevaarlike Transitions": Negotiating Hegemonic Masculinity and Rites of Passage Amongst Coloured Boys Awaiting Trial on the Cape Flats. Psychology in Society, 37, 1 - 17. Cooper, S., Nicholas, L., Seedat, M. & Statman, J. M. (1990). Psychology and Apartheid: The Struggle for Psychology in South Africa. In L. Nicholas & S. Cooper (Eds.), Psychology and Apartheid. Johannesburg: Vision/Madiba Press. *Corbet-Owen, C. (2003). Women's Perceptions of Partner Support in the Context of