Journals / Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

The relationship of insight with obsessive beliefs and metacognition in obsessive compulsive disorder

Pages
11–19
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Study results demonstrates that, contrary to common belief, certain metacognitions of patients and controls were comparable.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objectives: The treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) aims to neutralize obsessions and improve insight, in consideration of the information that OCD patients have positive beliefs about anxiety and do not rely on their attention and memory.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Methods: This study was conducted with a patient group, 101 OCD patients, and 52 healthy volunteers in the control group.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Study results demonstrates that, contrary to common belief, certain metacognitions of patients and controls were comparable.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objectives: The treatment of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) aims to neutralize obsessions and improve insight, in consideration of the information that OCD patients have positive beliefs about anxiety and do not rely on their attention and memory. Nevertheless, there are a limited number of studies about the relationship of insight with metacognitions and types of obsessive beliefs among OCD patients. This study aims to investigate those relationships. Methods: This study was conducted with a patient group, 101 OCD patients, and 52 healthy volunteers in the control group. All participants were given the Sociodemographic Data Form, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS), Obsessional Beliefs Questionnaire (OBQ-44) and Metacognition Questionnaire (MCQ-30). The patient group also received the Yale-Brown Obsessive Compulsive Scale (Y-BOCS) and the Overvalued Ideas Scale (OVIS). According to OVIS scores, the patient group was separated into two groups; poor insight and good insight. Results: The average scores of positive beliefs and cognitive confidence subscales of MCQ-30 were credible among the patient and healthy control groups. Patients with poor and good insight did not differ with regard to severity of obsessions, compulsions, depression, duration and beginning type of the disorder and other clinical and demographic variables and average scale scores. Patients with poor insight had higher average scores of MCQ positive beliefs than patients with good insight; however, the difference was not significant despite being close to the statistical significance verge. Depression severity of patients was higher than controls. Conclusion: Study results demonstrates that, contrary to common belief, certain metacognitions of patients and controls were comparable. No significant relationship was found between insight and metacognition in OCD. There is a need for qualitative studies with larger samples and more demographic and clinical data regarding insight. Additionally, the role of insight in OCD is arguable and the deterministic role of the level of insight in clinical approach and treatment should be questioned.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILMAZ, O., BOYRAZ, R. K., KURTULMUŞ, A., PARLAKKAYA, F. B., ÖZTÜRK, A. (2020). The relationship of insight with obsessive beliefs and metacognition in obsessive compulsive disorder. Psikiyatri Hemşireliği Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 11–19. https://ajindex.com/articles/308380

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Kitchner KS. Cognition, metacognition, and epistemic cognition. Hum Dev 1983; 26:222–32
  2. Cox MT. Metacognition in computation: A selected research review. Artif Intell 2005; 169:104–41
  3. Papageorgiou C, Wells A. Metacognitive beliefs about rumination in recurrent major depression. Cogn Behav Pract 2001;8:160–4
  4. Wells A. Cognition about cognition: Metacognitive therapy and change in generalized anxiety disorder and social phobia. Cogn Behav Pract 2007;14:18–25
  5. Fisher PL, Wells A. Metacognitive therapy for obsessive-compulsive disorder: a case series. J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry 2008;39:117–32
  6. Nance M, Abramowitz JS, Blakey SM, Reuman L, Buchholz JL. Thoughts and Thoughts about Thoughts: the Relative Contribution of Obsessive Beliefs and Metacognitive Beliefs in Predicting Obsessive-Compulsive Symptom Dimensions. Int J CognTher 2018;11:234–48. 7. de Bruin GO, Muris P, Rassin E. Are there specific meta-cognitions associated with vulnerability to symptoms of worry and obsessional thoughts? Pers Individ Dif 2007;42:689–99
  7. Janeck AS, Calamari JE, Riemann BC, Heffelfinger SK. Too much thinking about thinking?: metacognitive differences in obsessive–compulsive disorder. J Anxiety Disord 2003;17:181–95
  8. Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği. Mental Bozuklukların Tanısal ve Sayımsal El Kitabı, DSM-V. Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği; 2013
  9. Matthews G, Wells A. Attention, automaticity, and affective disorder. Behav Modif 2000;24:69–93
  10. Shafran R, Thordarson DS, Rachman S. Thought-action fusion in obsessive compulsive disorder. J Anxiety Disord 1996;10:379–91
  11. Myers SG, Fisher PL, Wells A. An empirical test of the metacognitive model of obsessive-compulsive symptoms: fusion beliefs, beliefs about rituals, and stop signals. J Anxiety Disord 2009;23:436–42
  12. Myers SG, Wells A. Obsessive-compulsive symptoms: the contribution of metacognitions and responsibility. J Anxiety Disord 2005;19:806–17
  13. Marková IS, Berrios GE. Insight in clinical psychiatry revisited. Compr Psychiatry 1995;36:367–76
  14. Fıstıkçı N, Keyvan A, Cesur E. Psikiyatrik Hastalıklarda İçgörü Kavramı: Bir Gözden Geçirme. Yeni Symposium 2016;54:25–9
  15. Wu MS, Lewin AB. Insight in Obsessive‐Compulsive Disorder. In: Abramowitz JS, McKay D, Storch EA, editors. The Wiley Handbook of Obsessive Compulsive Disorders. West Sussex: Wiley; 2017. p. 492–510
  16. Amerikan Psikiyatri Birliği. Mental Bozuklukların Tanısal ve Sayımsal El Kitabı, DSM-IV. Ankara: Hekimler Yayın Birliği; 1