Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2018 / Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4

The Prognostic Factors Affecting Anatomical and Functional Success in the Management of the Retinal Detachment with Giant Retinal Tears

Dev Yırtıklı Retina Dekolmanı Cerrahisinde Anatomik ve Fonksiyonel Başarı Üzerine Etkili Prognostik Faktörler

Pages
344–350
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusions: Mean duration of complaints, tear size, trauma history, PVR, macular involvement were considered as the prognostic factors affecting the success of surgical treatment of the retinal detachment with GRT.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To evaluate the factors affecting anatomical and functional success in the surgical management of the retinal detachment with giant retinal tears (GRT).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and methods: In this study, medical records of 75 eyes of 75 patients who surgically treated due to GRT were reviewed retrospe- ctively.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusions: Mean duration of complaints, tear size, trauma history, PVR, macular involvement were considered as the prognostic factors affecting the success of surgical treatment of the retinal detachment with GRT.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To evaluate the factors affecting anatomical and functional success in the surgical management of the retinal detachment with giant retinal tears (GRT). Materials and methods: In this study, medical records of 75 eyes of 75 patients who surgically treated due to GRT were reviewed retrospe- ctively. Pars plana vitrectomy (PPV) was performed in 53 patients and PPV + scleral buckling in 22 patients. Results: Patients were divided into pairwise groups considering the presence of preoperative PVR, trauma history, macular detachment and recurrence. Final best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) levels and postoperative visual gain were signifi cantly lower in the groups with these factors. The type of surgical procedure has no signifi cant effect on fi nal BCVA and postoperative visual gain. There were statistically sig- nifi cant negative correlations between the GRT size, mean duration of complaints and the levels fi nal BCVA and postoperative visual gain. Trauma history, PVR, macular detachment, greater tear size were the prognostic factors associated with poor fi nal BCVA and visual gain (th- ree-way ANOVA). PVR, macular detachment, greater tear size were found to be risk factors for the recurrence (logistic regression analysis). Conclusions: Mean duration of complaints, tear size, trauma history, PVR, macular involvement were considered as the prognostic factors affecting the success of surgical treatment of the retinal detachment with GRT.

Özet

Amaç: Dev yırtıklı retina dekolmanı (DYRD) tanısıyla cerrahi tedavi uygulanan hastalarda anatomik ve fonksiyonel başarıyı etkileyen prognostik faktörlerin incelenmesi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu çalışma kapsamında DYRD tanısıyla cerrahi tedavi uygulanan 75 hastanın 75 gözüne ait medikal kayıtlar geriye dönük olarak incelendi. Cerrahi yaklaşımda 53 hastaya pars plana vitrektomi (PPV), 22 hastaya ise PPV + skleral çökertme (SÇ) cerrahisi uygulandı. Bulgular: Hastalar cerrahi öncesi proliferatif vitreoretinopati (PVR), travma hikâyesi, makula tutulumu ve cerrahi sonrası nüks gelişimi dikkate alınarak ayrı ayrı ikişerli gruplara ayrıldı. Bu faktörlerin bulunduğu hasta gruplarındaki sonuç en iyi düzeltilmiş görme keskinliği (EİDGK) ve görme artışı düzeyleri istatistiksel anlamlı düzeyde düşük idi. Seçilen cerrahi yöntemin sonuç EİDGK ve görme artışı düzeyi üzerine istatistiksel anlamlı bir etkisinin olmadığı görüldü. Yırtık büyüklüğü ve şikâyet süresi ile sonuç EİDGK ve görme artışı düzeyleri arasında istatistiksel anlamlı düzeyde negatif korelasyon vardı. Travma öyküsü, PVR, makula tutulumu, yırtık büyüklüğü sonuç EİDGK ve görme artışı üzerine etkili kötü prognostik faktörler idi (üç yönlü Anova testi). Ayrıca PVR, makula tutulumu, yırtık büyüklüğünün nüks gelişimi için risk faktörleri olduğu tespit edildi (lojistik regresyon analizi). Sonuç: Şikâyet süresi, yırtık boyutu, travma öyküsü, cerrahi öncesi PVR mevcudiyeti, makula tutulumlu DYRD cerrahi tedavi başarısını etkileyen prognostik faktörler olduğu düşünüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÖK, M., KARABAŞ, V. L., YENİHAYAT, F., SUBAŞI, S., KARAMAN, S., ASLAN, M. Ş. (2018). The Prognostic Factors Affecting Anatomical and Functional Success in the Management of the Retinal Detachment with Giant Retinal Tears. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 27 - Sayı: 4, 344–350. https://ajindex.com/articles/308124

References (12)

  1. Ang GS, Townend J, Lois N. Epidemiology of giant retinal tears in the United Kingdom: The British Giant Retinal Tear Epidemiology Eye Study (BGEES). Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci 2010;51(9):4781- 7 Kennedy CJ, Parker CE, McAllister IL. Retinal detachment caused by retinal dialysis. Aust N Z J Ophthalmol 1997;25(1):25-30
  2. Schepens CL, Freeman HM. Current management of giant retinal breaks. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Otolaryngol 1967;71(3):474- 87 Shunmugam M, Ang GS, Lois N. Giant retinal tears. Surv Opht- halmol 2014;59(2):192-216
  3. Ang GS, Townend J, Lois N. Interventions for prevention of gi- ant retinal tear in the fellow eye. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 2012;15;(2):CD006909 Schepens CL, Dobble JG, McMeel JW. Retinal detachments with giant breaks: Preliminary report. Trans Am Acad Ophthalmol Oto- laryngol 1962;66:471-9
  4. Miki D, Hida T, Hotta K, Shinoda K, Hirakata A. Comparison of scleral buckling and vitrectomy for retinal detachment re- sulting from fl ap tears in superior quadrants. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2001;45(2):187-91
  5. Koriyama M, Nishimura T, Matsubara T, Taomoto M, Takahashi K, Matsumura M. Prospective study comparing the effectiveness of scleral buckling to vitreous surgery for rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Jpn J Ophthalmol 2007;51(5):360-7
  6. Ambresin A, Wolfensberger TJ, Bovey EH. Management of giant retinal tears with vitrectomy, internal tamponade, and peripheral 360 degrees retinal photocoagulation. Retina 2003;23(5):622-8
  7. Chang S, Lincoff H, Zimmerman NJ, Fuchs W. Giant retinal te- ars. Surgical techniques and results using perfl uorocarbon liquids. Arch Ophthalmol 1989;107(5):761-6
  8. Kreiger AE, Lewis H. Management of giant retinal tears without scleral buckling. Use of radical dissection of the vitreous base and perfl uoro-octane and intraocular tamponade. Ophthalmology 1992;99(4):491-7
  9. Hoffman ME, Sorr EM. Management of giant retinal tears without scleral buckling. Retina 1986;6(4):197-204
  10. Goezinne F, LA Heij EC, Berendschot TT, et al. Low redetachment rate due to encircling scleral buckle in giant retinal tears treated with vitrectomy and silicone oil. Retina 2008;28(3):485-92
  11. Sharma Y, Reddy P, Azad R. 60 degree scleral buckling in vitreous surgery for giant retinal tears without proliferative vitreoretinopat- hy changes. Dulles, USA: American Academy of Ophthalmology; 2000.
  12. Rofail M, Lee LR. Perfl uoro-n-octane as a postoperative vitreore- tinal tamponade in the management of giant retinal tears. Retina 2005;25:897-901 Batman C1, Cekiç O. Vitrectom