Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2005 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1

Intraocular pressure rise following pars plana vitrectomy

Pars plana vitrektomi sonrası göz içi basınç artış nedenlerimiz

Pages
27–31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Lensectomy and silicone oil tamponade are more effective on IOP rise, by various mechanisms.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: In this study,we evaluated the frequency of intraocular pressure (IOP) rise following pars plana vitrectomy(PPV), the mechanisms and its relationship with the applied surgical procedure.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: Seventysix eyes of 76 patiens, which had PPV between June 2001 and August 2002 were evaluated prospectively for the IOP rise mechanisms and factors that affect this rise.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Lensectomy and silicone oil tamponade are more effective on IOP rise, by various mechanisms.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2001 Verileri
⚙️Variables:İleriye dönük çalışma · Göz içi basınç · Vitrektomi

Abstract

Purpose: In this study,we evaluated the frequency of intraocular pressure (IOP) rise following pars plana vitrectomy(PPV), the mechanisms and its relationship with the applied surgical procedure. Materials and Methods: Seventysix eyes of 76 patiens, which had PPV between June 2001 and August 2002 were evaluated prospectively for the IOP rise mechanisms and factors that affect this rise. Results: Mean IOP was 12.19 ± 5.53 preoperatively, 20.34 ± 12.20 on the postoperative 1 st day, 14.62 ± 7.05 on the postoperative 1 st month and 14.51 ± 6.41 on the postoperative 6th month. The difference between the IOP on the postoperative 1 st day,1 st month,and 6th month was found to be statistically significant. Statistically significant relationship between phakia and open angle glaucoma development was also detected. Also the relation of lensectomy and silicone oil tamponade with pupillary blockage glaucoma was statistically significant. Conclusion: Following vitrectomy, IOP rise can be seen. Lensectomy and silicone oil tamponade are more effective on IOP rise, by various mechanisms.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada Pars Plana Vitrektomi(PPV) sonrası göz içi basınç(GİB) artış sıklığı, mekanizmaları ve uygulanan cerrahi yöntemle ilişkisi değerlendirilmeye çalışılmıştır. Gereç ve Yöntem: Haziran 2001 ile Ağustos 2002 tarihleri arasında, hastanemizin 2.Göz kliniğinde PPV uygulanan 76 hastanın 76 gözü prospektif olarak GİB artış mekanizmaları ve bu artışı etkileyen faktörler açısından değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Hastaların cerrahi girişim öncesi GİB'ı ortalama 12.19 ± 5.53, cerrahi girişim sonrası 1. günde GİB'ı ortalama 20.34 ± 12.20, cerrahi girişim sonrası 1. ay GİB'ı ortalama 14.62 ± 7.05 ve 6.ay GİB'ı ortalama 14.51 ± 6.41 olup cerrahi girişim öncesi GİB'ı ile cerrahi girişim sonrası 1.gün, 1.ay ve 6.ay GİB'ı arasındaki fark istatistiksel olarak anlamlı bulundu. Fakik olma ile açık açılı glokom gelişmesi; lensektomi yapılması ve silikon tamponad kullanılması ile pupil bloğu glokomu gelişmesi arasında istatistiksel olarak anlamlı derecede bir ilişki saptanmıştır. Sonuç: Vitrektomi sonrası GİB artışı görülebilmektedir. Lensektomi yapılması ve silikon tamponad kullanılması çeşitli mekanizmalar aracılığıyla GİB artışı üzerinde daha etkili olmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

PINARCI, Y. E., BAYRAKTAR, Z., KAPRAN, Z., BAYRAKTAR, Ş., ALKIN, Z., KAYA, F. (2005). Intraocular pressure rise following pars plana vitrectomy. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 1, 27–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/307961

References (1)

  1. Aaberg TM, Van Horn DL: Late complications of pars plana vitreous surgery. Ophthalmology 1978;85:126-140 2. Weinberg RS, Peyman GA, Huamonte FU: Elavation of intraocular pressure after pars plana vitrectomy. Albrecht von Graefes Arch Klin Exp Ophthalmol 1976;200:157-161 3. Abrams GW, Swanson DE, Sabates Wl, et al.: The results of sulfur hexafloride gas in vitreous surgery. Am J Ophthalmol 1982;94:165-171 4. Lucke KH. Foerster MH, Laqua H: Long term results of vitrectomy and silicone oil in 500 cases of complicated retinal detachments. Am J Ophthalmol 1987;104:624-3 5. La Heij EC, Hendrikse F, Kessels AG: Results and complications of temporary silicone oil tamponade in patiens with complicated retinal detachments. Retina 2001,-21:107-114 6. Jonas JB, Knorr HL, Rank RM, et al.: Intraocular pressure and silicone oil endotamponade.J Glaucoma 2001;10:102-108 7. Burk LL, Shields MB, Proia ÀD; et al.: Intraocular pressure following intravitreal silicone oil injection. Ophthalmic Surg 1988;95:870-876 8. Nguyen QH, Lloyd MA, Heuer DK, et al: Incidence and management of glaucoma after intravitreal silicone oil injection for complicated retinal detachments. Ophthalmology 1992;99:1520-1529. 9. Jackson TL, Thiagarajan M, Murthy R, et al.: Pupil block glaucoma in phakic and pseudophakic patients after vitrectomy with silicone oil injection. Am J Ophthalmol 2001;132:414-416 10. Dennis R Han, Lewis H, Fred H: Lambrou: Mechanisms of intraocular Pressure Elevation after Pars Plana Vitrectomy. Ophthalmology 1989; 96:1357-1362, 11. Levine AM,r Ellis RA: Intraocular liquid silicone implants. Am J Ophthalmol 1963;55:939 12. Batman C. Çekiç O, Aslan O, et al.: Silikon yağı uygulanan vitreoretinal cerrahi olgularında sekonder glokom. Ret-vit 1998;6:32-37. 13. Ni C, Wang W, Albert DM, et al.: Intravitreous silicone injection.Histopathologic findings in a human eye after 12 years. Arch Ophthalmol 1983;101:1399-1401. 14. Grey RHB, Leaver PF: Results of silicone oil injection in massive preretinal traction. Trans Ophthalmol Soc UK 1977;97:328-341 15. Leaver PF,Grey RHB, Garner A: Silicone oil injection in the treatment of massive preretinal tractions in 93 eyes. Br J Ophthalmol 1979;63:361-367 16. Haut J, Uliern M, Chermet M, et al.: Complications of intraocular injections of silicone combined with vitrectomy. Ophthalmologica 1980; 180:29-35. 17. Watzke RC: Silicone retinopiesis for retinal detachment. A long term clinical evaluation. Arch Ophthalmol 1967;77.185-196 18. Ünlü N,