Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2012 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4

The distribution of congenital ocular malformations in newborn ocular screening

Yenidoğan göz taramasında saptanan doğumsal göz anomalilerinin dağılımı

Pages
273–278
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Detailed systemic and eye examination is essential in anomalous newborns for early diagnosis and treatment of associated lesions.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To examine the distribution of congenital ocular anomalies in newborn screening and to emphasize the importance of directing families for necessary treatment, rehabilitation programs and genetic counseling.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: 12844 eyes of 6422 newborns who were born in Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Education and Research Hospital between January 2006 and December 2011 were examined. 6097 newborns were scanned for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and 325 newborns were consulted for eye examination from the neonatology department.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Detailed systemic and eye examination is essential in anomalous newborns for early diagnosis and treatment of associated lesions.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To examine the distribution of congenital ocular anomalies in newborn screening and to emphasize the importance of directing families for necessary treatment, rehabilitation programs and genetic counseling. Materials and Methods: 12844 eyes of 6422 newborns who were born in Zekai Tahir Burak Women’s Health Education and Research Hospital between January 2006 and December 2011 were examined. 6097 newborns were scanned for retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) and 325 newborns were consulted for eye examination from the neonatology department. Our study is a descriptive study based on records. Results: Congenital eye anomalies were detected in 101 eyes (7.86%). Of these 101 eyes, 57 eyes were diagnosed in consulted babies for anomaly screening and 44 eyes were diagnosed during ROP screening. Anterior segment anomalies were detected in 52 eyes (51.4%), posterior segment anomalies were determined in 19 eyes (18.8%) and both the anterior and posterior segment anomalies were found in 30 eyes (29.7%). The most frequently detected anomaly was coloboma (28.7%) and 3 eyelid, 10 iris, 4 chorioretinal, 6 iris-chorioretinal, 3 optic disk, and 3 iris-chorioretinal-optic disc coloboma were observed. In 12194 eyes scanned for ROP, the anomaly rate was 3.32% and the most frequently anomaly was coloboma (1.06%). In 650 eyes examined for anomaly screening, the anomaly rate was 8.76% and the most common anomaly was coloboma (2.0%). Conclusion: The most common congenital eye anomalies observed in this study were coloboma and microphtalmia. Detailed systemic and eye examination is essential in anomalous newborns for early diagnosis and treatment of associated lesions.

Özet

Amaç: Yenidoğan bölümünden göz muayenesi için konsulte edilen yenidoğanların muayenesinde saptanan doğumsal göz anomalilerinin dağılımını incelemek ve gerekli tedavi, rehabilitasyon programları, genetik danışmanlık için ailelerin yönlendirilmesinin önemini vurgulamak. Gereç ve Yöntem: Zekai Tahir Burak Kadın Sağlığı Eğitim ve Araştırma Hastanesi’nde Ocak 2006-Aralık 2011 tarihleri arasında doğan, 6422 hastanın 12844 gözü çalışmaya alındı. Hastaların 6097’si yenidoğan bölümünden prematüre retinopatisi (PR), 325’i ise anomali taraması amacıyla konsulte edildi. Çalışmamız kayıtlara dayalı olarak yapılmış tanımlayıcı bir çalışmadır. Bulgular: Tarama yapılan grubun %7.86’ında (101 göz) doğumsal göz anomalisi tespit edildi. Bu 101 gözün %56.4’sına yenidoğan bölümünden anomali taraması için konsulte edilen bebeklerin taraması esnasında, %43.5’ine ise PR taraması esnasında tanı konuldu. 52 gözde (%51.4) ön segment, 19 gözde (%18.8) arka segment, 30 gözde (%29.7) ise hem ön hem arka segment tutulumu belirlendi. En sık tespit edilen göz anomalisi kolobom idi (%28.7) ve bu gözlerin 3’ünde kapak, 10’unda iris, 4’ünde koryoretinal, 6’sında iris ve koryoretinal, 3’ünde optik disk, 3’ünde ise iris, koryoretinal ve optik disk kolobomu bulunmaktaydı. PR için tarama yaptığımız 12194 gözde anomali oranı %3.32 ve en sık tanı alan anomali kolobom (%1.06) idi. Anomali taraması için muayene edilen toplam 650 gözde anomali oranı %8.76 ve en sık görülen anomali kolobom (%2.0) idi. Sonuç: Çalışmamızda en yaygın tespit edilen doğumsal göz anomalileri kolobom ve mikroftalmi idi. Anomalisi olan bebeklerin ayrıntılı göz ve sistemik muayenelerinin yapılması eşlik eden patolojilerin erken tanı ve tedavisi için önemlidir.

🔖

Cite This Article

PETRİÇLİ, İ. S., TUNAY, Z. Ö., ÖZDEMİR, Ö. (2012). The distribution of congenital ocular malformations in newborn ocular screening. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 4, 273–278. https://ajindex.com/articles/307702

References (1)

  1. Azar NF, Davis EA. Embryology of the eye. Yanoff M, Duker JS: Ophthalmology 2nd ed. Mosby 2004:22-7. 2.Gilbert C, Foster A. Childhood blindness in the context of VİSİON 2020-the right to sight. Bull World Health Organ 2001;79:227-32. 3.Turan A, Recep ÖF, Abdik O. Türkiye’de çocukluk çağı körlükleri: Görme engelliler okullarındaki tarama sonuçları. T Oft Dergisi 2002;32:397-400. 4.Ragge NK, Subak-Sharpe ID, Collin JRO. A practical guide to management of anophthalmia and microphthalmia. Eye 2007;21:1290-300. 5.Merdoğan İdil A. Az gören çocuklarda görsel rehabilitasyon. Turkiye Klinikleri J Ophthalmol-Special Topics 2011;4:73-8. 6.Rachitskaya AV, Traboulsi EI. Congenital ocular malformations. Wilson ME, Saunders RA, Trivedi RH: Pediatric Ophthalmology, Current Thought and A Practical Guide. Springer. Berlin 2009:287-310. 7.Uğurbaş SH, Zilelioğlu G, Günalp I, et al. Microphthalmus: clinical and ultrasonographic findings. Ann Ophthalmol 2007;39:112-22. 8.Shah SP, Taylor AT, Sowden JC, et al. Anophthalmos, microphthalmos, and coloboma in the United Kingdom: Clinical features, results of investigations, and early management. Ophthalmology 2012;119:362-8. 9.Nakamura KM, Dielh NN, Monhey BG. Incidence, ocular findings, and systemic associations of ocular coloboma: a population-based study. Arch Ophthalmol 2011;129:69-74. 10.Berk AT, Yaman A, Saatçi AO. Ocular and systemic findings as sociated with optic disc colobomas. J Pediatr Ophthalmol Strabismus 2003;40:272-8. 11.Daufenbach DR, Ruttum MS, Pulido JS, et al. Chorioretinal colobomas in a pediatric population. Ophthalmology 1998;105:1455-8. 12.Nischal KK. Developmental anomalies of the anterior segment and globe. Wright KW, Spiegel PH: Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag. New York 2003:369-90. 13.Bermejo E, Martinez-Frias ML. Congenital eye malformations: Clinical-epidemiological analysis of 1,124,654 consecutive births in Spain. Am J Med Genet 1998;17;75:497-504. 14.Vogt G, Szunyogh M, Czeizel AE. Birth characteristics of different ocular congenital abnormalities in Hungary. Ophthalmic Epidemiol 2006;13:159-66. 15.Busby A, Dolk H, Collin R, Jones RB, Winter R: Compiling a national register of babies born with anophthalmia/microphthalmia in England 1988-94. Arch Dis Child Fetal Neonatal Ed 1998;79:168-73. 16.Eustis HS, Guthrie ME. Postnatal development. In: Wright KW, Spiegel PH. Pediatric Ophthalmology and Strabismus 2nd ed. Springer-Verlag. New York 2003:39-53. 17.Chen D, Heher K. Ma