SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2015 / Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3

Outcomes of Pneumatic Retinopexy

Pnömotik Retinopeksi Sonuçlarımız

Taner KAR
Sercan Koray SAĞDIÇ
Yıldıray YILDIRIM
Tuncay TOPAL
ALİ AYATA
Melih Hamdi ÜNAL
Pages
215–218
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Because pneumatic retinopexy is a simple, low cost and minimally invasive surgical procedure, it is a preferable technique for selective retinal detachment cases

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: To assess the efficiency of pneumatic retinopexy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachments.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, medical record review was conducted of patients who underwent primary PR between 2011 and 2014 .
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Because pneumatic retinopexy is a simple, low cost and minimally invasive surgical procedure, it is a preferable technique for selective retinal detachment cases
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the efficiency of pneumatic retinopexy in rhegmatogenous retinal detachments. Materials and Methods: In this retrospective study, medical record review was conducted of patients who underwent primary PR between 2011 and 2014 . The follow-up period was at least 6 months. anatomical success, postoperative visual acuity and complications were evaluated. Results: A total of 21 cases were included in the study. Reattachment of the retina was achieved in 66.6% (14 of 21 cases) of cases with pneumatic retinopexy and and 100% of cases after additional surgical procedures. The mean preoperative and postoperative visual acuity measurements were 0.99±0.98 (logMAR) ve 0.26±0.18 (logMAR), respectively (Wilcoxon, p=0.001). The postoperative complications were new breaks (2 cases), macular hole (1 case) and proliferative vitreoretinopathy (1 case). Conclusion: Because pneumatic retinopexy is a simple, low cost and minimally invasive surgical procedure, it is a preferable technique for selective retinal detachment cases

Özet

Amaç: Yırtıklı retina dekolmanında pnömotik retinopeksinin etkinliğini değerlendirmek. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu retrospektif çalışmada 2011-2014 yılları arasında yırtıklı retina dekolmanı nedeniyle pnömotik retinopeksi tedavisi yapılan, en az 6 ay takip edilen hastaların medikal kayıtları kullanıldı. Anatomik başarı, postoperatif görme keskinliği ve komplikasyonlar değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Çalışmaya 21 hasta dahil edildi. Pnömotik retinopeksi ile vakaların %66.6'sında (21 vakanın 14'ü), ilave cerrahi işlemler ile %100'ünde retinal yatışıklık sağlandı. Ortalama preoperatif ve postoperatif görme keskinlikleri sırasıyla 0.99±0.98 (logMAR) ve 0.26±0.18 (logMAR) olarak ölçüldü (Wilcoxon, p=0.001). Postoperatif komplikasyonlar yeni yırtık oluşumu (2 vaka), maküla deliği (1 vaka) ve proliferatif vitreoretinopatiydi (1 vaka). Sonuç: Pnömotik retinopeksi basit, düşük maliyetli ve minimal invazif bir cerrahi prosedür olduğu için, seçilmiş retina dekolman vakalarında tercih edilebilecek bir yöntemdir

🔖

Cite This Article

KAR, T., SAĞDIÇ, S. K., YILDIRIM, Y., TOPAL, T., AYATA, A., ÜNAL, M. H. (2015). Outcomes of Pneumatic Retinopexy. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 23 - Sayı: 3, 215–218. https://ajindex.com/articles/307672

References (14)

  1. Dominguez A. Cirugia precoz y ambulatoria del desprendimento de re- tina. Arch Soc Esp Oftalmol 1985;48:47-54. 2. Hilton GF, Grizzard WS. Pneumatic retinopexy: a two step outpatient operation without conjunctival incision. Ophthalmology 1986;93:626-41.
  2. Hoerauf H, Heimann H, Hansen L, et al. Scleral buckling surgery and pneumatic retinopexy. Techniques, indications and results. Ophthal- mologe 2008;105:7-18.
  3. Han DP, Mohsin NC, Guse CE, et al. Comparison of pneumatic retino- pexy and scleral buckling in the management of primary rhegmatoge- nous retinal detachment. Am J Ophthalmol 1998;126:658-68. Tornambe PE. Pneumatic retinopexy: the evolution of case selection and surgical technique: a twelve year study of 302 eyes. Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 1997;95:551-78.
  4. Chan CK, Lin SG, Nuthi AS, et al. Pneumatic retinopexy for the repa- ir of retinal detachments: a comprehensive review (1986-2007). Surv Ophthalmol 2008;53:443-78.
  5. Lisle C, Mortensen KK, Sjolie AK. Pneumatic retinopexy. Acta Oph- thalmol Scand 1998;76:486-90.
  6. Assi AC, Charteris DG, Pearson RV, et al. Pneumatic retinopexy in thetreatment of primary rhegmatogenous retinal detachment. Eye 1999;13:725-8.
  7. Zaidi AA, Alvarado R, Irvine A.Pneumatic retinopexy: success rate and complications. Br J Ophthalmol 2006;90:427-8.
  8. Kulkarni KM, Roth DB, Prenner JL. Current visual and anatomic out- comes of pneumatic retinopexy. Retina 2007;27:1065-70.
  9. Kazokoğlu H, Yenice Ö, Özcan E, ve ark. Yırtıklı retina dekolmanların- da pnömatik retinopeksi. Ret-Vit 2005;13:289-93.
  10. Gündüz K, Günalp İ. Pnömatik retinopeksi. MN Oftalmol 1994;2:180-8.
  11. Bardak Y, Çekiç O, Tığ UŞ, ve ark. Pnömatik retinopeksi sonuçlarımız. Ret-Vit 2007;15:103-6.
  12. Uyar OM, Akkan F, Eryiğit T, ve ark. Pnömatik retinopeksi sonuçları. Ret-Vit 2009;17:28-31.
  13. Hilton GF, Tornambe PE. Pneumatic retinopexy. An analysis of int- raoperative and postoperative complications. The Retinal Detachment Study Group. Retina 1991;11:285-94.
  14. Grizzard W, Hilton GF, Hammer ME, et al. Pneumatic retinopexy fa- ilures: cause, prevention, timing, and management. Ophthalmology 1995;102:929-36.