Journals / Romatizma Dergisi / 2000 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3

Etiological assessment of our chronic low back pain patients

Kronik bel ağrılı hastalarımızın etyolojik yönden değerlendirilmesi

Pages
191–198
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The patients were classified according to etiology, age, sex, profession, duration and localization of pain, clinical and radiological findings.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Low back pain is an extremely common condition, affecting 80% of individuals at some point in their lifetime.
📊
Key Findings & Data:However, a small percentage of these acute cases, 5-10% in most series, progress to develop chronic low back pain.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The patients were classified according to etiology, age, sex, profession, duration and localization of pain, clinical and radiological findings.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yaş faktörü · Sırt ve bel · İleriye dönük çalışma

Abstract

Low back pain is an extremely common condition, affecting 80% of individuals at some point in their lifetime. Most episodes of acute low back pain resolve spontaneously, regardless of the type of therapy chosen. However, a small percentage of these acute cases, 5-10% in most series, progress to develop chronic low back pain. Epidemiologic studies have established demographic characteristics and risk factors for the development of low back pain. This study was carried out on 312 cases referring to the University of Dicle, Faculty of Medicine, Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation department with chronic low back pain. The patients were classified according to etiology, age, sex, profession, duration and localization of pain, clinical and radiological findings.

Özet

Bel ağrısı, insanların %80' ini yaşamlarının herhangi bir döneminde etkileyen bir durumdur. Akut bel ağrısının çoğu epizodları herhangi bir tedavi olmaksızın kendiliğinden iyileşebilir. Bununla birlikte bu akut vakaların % 5-10'undan daha fazlası kronikleşebilir. Epidemiyolojik çalışmalar bel ağrısının gelişmesinde rol oynayan risk faktörlerini ve hastaların demografik özelliklerini ortaya koymaktadır. Bu çalışma Dicle Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Fiziksel Tıp ve Rehabilitasyon Kliniğine başvuran kronik bel ağrılı 312 hasta üzerinde yapıldı. Hastalar etyoloji, yaş, cinsiyet, meslek, ağrı süresi ve lokalizasyonu, klinik ve radyolojik bulgularına göre sınıflandırıldı.

🔖

Cite This Article

GÜR, A., NAS, K., ÇEVİK, R., ERDOĞAN, F., SARAÇ, A. J. (2000). Etiological assessment of our chronic low back pain patients. Romatizma Dergisi, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 3, 191–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/306087

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (1)

  1. zygapohysial (facet) joints. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 1996; 77(3): 290-300 2. Jenkins EM, Borenstein DG: Exercise for the low back pain patient. Baillieres Clinical Rheumatology 1994; 8(1): 191- 97 3. Borenstein DG, Wiesel SW, Boden SD. Low back pain. Medical diagnosis and comprehensive management. 2nd ed. Philadelphia, WB Saunders Comp. 1995: 181-589 4. Kuday T. Bel aÛrÝlarÝ tanÝ ve tedavisi, Üstanbul 1993 5. Hizmetli S. Akut Lomber disk hernilerinde egzersiz tedavisinin terapštik etkisi Fizik Ted Rehab Der 1991; 15(3): 128- 30 6. Yurtkuran M, ‚erel N: Mekanik bel aÛrÝlÝ hastalarÝn tedavisinde egzersiz tedavisi ile fizik tedavinin karßÝlaßtÝrÝlmasÝ. Fizik Ted rehab Derg 1992; 16(3): 158-162 7. Blome O, Brandenburg S, Wirbelsaule und Breuf, Hauptverband der Gewerblichen Beruf Genossens chaften, Bšninghausen Gmbh, Kšln 1994 8. Brodie DJ, Burnett JW. Evaluation of low back pain by patient questionnaries and therapist assessment, JOSP 1990; 11: 11 9. Lehmann TR, Spratt KF, Lehmann KK. Predicting long-term disability in low back injured workers presenting to a spine consultant. Spine 1993 Jun 15; 18(8): 1103-12 10. Weinstein SM, Herring AS. Rehabilitation of the patient with low back pain. Rehabilitation Medicin, Principles and Practive, 2nd ed. DeLisa JB. Lippincott Company, Philedelphia 1993; 47: 996-1017 11. Berker E. Bel aÛrÝsÝnda konservatif tedavi Hipokrat 1996 Eyl Ÿl, 53: 40-4 12. Rachin ES. Disorders of the lumbosacral spine. In: Goodgold J (ed): rehabilitation Medicine. Toronto, CV. Mosby Company, 1988; 570-600 13. Clairmont AC. Industrial rehabilitation Medicine 3. Treatment. Arch Phys Med Rehabil. May 1992;73 14. Cox JM. Diagnosis of the patient with low back pain. In: Cox JM (ed.). Low back pain, 5th ed, London, Williamsd and Wilkins,1991: 339 15. Szpalzski M, Nordin M, Skowron L. Health care utilization for low back pain in Belgium. Spine 1995; 20: 431-442 16. GŸrkan A ve ark. Bel aÛrÝlÝ olgularÝn lumbosakral bulgularÝ. XIV. Ulusal Fizik tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Kongresi zet KitabÝ,1993: s: 134 17. KaramehmetoÛlu ÞS. ve ark. Bel ve/veya bacak aÛrÝlÝ hastalar Ýn yaß-cins-tanÝ-meslek-mevsim daÛÝlÝmÝ ve morbiditesi. XIV. Ulusal Fizik tedavi ve Rehabilitasyon Kongresi zet KitabÝ,1993: s: 125 18. Hizmetli S. Bel aÛrÝlÝ olgularÝmÝzÝn lumbosakral grafilerinde saptadÝÛÝmÝz radyolojik bulgular. Fizik Ted Rehab Derg. 1990, 14:4 19. Berker C, KocabaßoÛlu C, zgŸzel H, ner N. Bel aÛrÝlÝ hastalar ÝmÝzÝn šzellikleri. Fizik Ted Rehab Der 1995; 19(2): 87- 9 20. Must