Journals / Romatizma Dergisi / 2005 / Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3

Effect of seropositivity on bone mineral density in chronic inflammatory diseases

Kronik inflamatuvar hastalıklarda seropozitivitenin kemik mineral yoğunluğuna etkisi

Pages
13–18
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

We suggest that the increased risk of OP in chronic inflammatory diseases is present but not dependent on the seropositive and seronegative characteristic of the disease.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Localised and generalised bone loss in chronic inflammatory diseases result in an increased risk of fractures with associated morbidity and mortality.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Our aim was to observe bone mineral density (BMD) changes in seropositive and seronegative chronic inflammatory diseases and to evaluate the effect of clinical characteristics on BMD. 75 seropositive, 15 seronegative RA and 27 AS patients with 25 healthy volunteers were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:We suggest that the increased risk of OP in chronic inflammatory diseases is present but not dependent on the seropositive and seronegative characteristic of the disease.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Artrit · romatoid · Kemik yoğunluğu

Abstract

Localised and generalised bone loss in chronic inflammatory diseases result in an increased risk of fractures with associated morbidity and mortality. Our aim was to observe bone mineral density (BMD) changes in seropositive and seronegative chronic inflammatory diseases and to evaluate the effect of clinical characteristics on BMD. 75 seropositive, 15 seronegative RA and 27 AS patients with 25 healthy volunteers were included in the study. Seronegative RA patients and all AS patients were accepted as the seronegative group. BMD measurements were carried out at lumbar spine and femur neck by DEXA. We found significant difference between T scores of seropositive patients and control groups. The difference was not statistically significant between seronegative and seropositive groups though BMD values were lower for the seropositive group at either site. For the seronegative group, we found no statistically significant difference between spondyloarthropathy and seronegative RA patient groups in terms of spinal and femoral T scores. We suggest that the increased risk of OP in chronic inflammatory diseases is present but not dependent on the seropositive and seronegative characteristic of the disease.

Özet

Kronik inflamatuvar hastalıklarda görülen lokalize ve jeneralize kemik kaybı, kırık riskinde artış ile morbidite ve mortaliteye sebep olabilir. Bu çalışmada amacımız seropozitif ve seronegatif kronik inflamatuvar hastalıklarda kemik mineral yoğunluğu (KMY) değişikliklerini incelemek ve klinik karakteristik özelliklerin kemik mineral yoğunluğu üzerine etkilerini araştırmaktır. 75 seropozitif, 15 seronegatif Romatoid Artrit (RA) ve 27 Ankilozan Spondilitli(AS) hasta ile 25 sağlıklı gönüllü denek çalışmaya alındı. Seronegatif RA hastaları ve AS'li hastalar seronegatif grup olarak kabul edildi. DEXA ile femur boynu ve lomber vertebralarda KMY ölçüldü. Seropozitif hastalar ve kontrol grubu arasında T skorları açısından anlamlı fark mevcuttu. Seronegatif grup kendi içinde değerlendirildiğinde seronegatif RA hastaları ve spondiloartropati hastaları arasında da spinal ve femoral T skorları farklı değildi. Seropozitif ve seronegatif gruplar karşılaştırıldığında ise seropozitif grubun değerleri daha düşük olmakla birlikte farkın iki bölgede de (femur ve L2-4) anlamlı olmadığı görüldü. Sonuçta, kronik inflamatuvar hastalıklarda osteoporoz riskinin arttığı ancak bu riskin hastalığın seronegatif veya seropozitif olmasından bağımsız olduğuna karar verildi.

🔖

Cite This Article

İNCEL, A. N., SARAÇOĞLU, M., KARAGÖZ, A., ERDEM, H. R. (2005). Effect of seropositivity on bone mineral density in chronic inflammatory diseases. Romatizma Dergisi, Cilt: 20 - Sayı: 3, 13–18. https://ajindex.com/articles/306004

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Keller C, Hafström I, Svensson B. Bone mineral density in women and men with early rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 2001;30:213-20
  2. Hansen M, Florescu A, Stoltenberg M, et al. Bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis. Scand J Rheumatol 1996;25:367-76
  3. Savieckiene A, Baranauskaite A. Changes in bone mineral density in rheumatoid arthritis Medicina (Kaunas) 2002;38:190-6
  4. Cortet B, Guyot MH, Solau E, et al. Factors influencing bone loss in rheumatoid arthritis: a longitudinal study. Clin Exp Rheumatol 2000;18:683-9 5. Scott DL. Prognostic factors in early rheumatoid arthritis Rheumatology 2000; 39(suppl.1):24-29
  5. Arnett FC, Edworthy SM, Bloch DA. The American Rheumatism Association 1987 revised criteria for the classification of rheumatoid arthritis. Arthritis Rheum 1988;31:315-24. 7. van der Linden S, Valkenburg HA, Cats A. Evaluation of diagnostic criteria for Ankylosing spondylitis. Arthritis Rheum 1984;27:361-67
  6. Jones SM, Bhalla AK. Osteoporosis in rheumatoid arthritis. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1993;11:557-62
  7. Kroot EJ, Nieuwenhuizen MG, de Waal Malefijt MC, et al. Change in bone mineral density in patients with rheumatoid arthritis during the first decade of the disease. Arthritis Rheum 2001; 44:1254-60
  8. Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK. Bone mineral density and frequency of osteoporosis in female patients with rheumatoid arthritis: results from 394 patients in the Oslo County Rheumatoid Arthritis register. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43(3):522-30 11. Dreher R, Lingg G, listing J, Zink A Increased prevalence and risk of osteoporosis in rheumatoid factor-positive rheumaotid arthritis as compared to rheumatoid factor negative rheumatoid arthritis. Abstract P256SU; abstract book p:80, IOF World congress on Osteoporosis 2002, Lisbon 12. Haugeberg G, Uhlig T, Falch JA, Halse JI, Kvien TK. Reduced bone mineral density in male rheumatoid arthritis patients: frequencies and associations with demographic and disease variables in ninety-four patients in the Oslo County Rheumatoid Arthritis register. Arthritis Rheum 2000;43(12):2776-84 13. Shibuya K, Hagino H, Morio Y, Teshima R. Cross-sectional and longitudinal study of osteoporosis in patients with rheumatoid arthritis. ClinRheumatol 2002;21:150-58 14. Sambrook PN, Ansell BM, Foster S, Gumpel JM, Hesp R, Reeve J. Bone turnover in early rheumatoid arthritis 2. Longitudinal bone density studies. Ann Rheum Dis 1985;44:580-4