Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2020 / Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4

Controversial Issues in The Treatment of Traumatic Optic Neuropathy: A Journey Through Historical Course

Pages
361–365
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

As similar to stroke and degenerative neurological disorders, the effi ciency of neuroprotective agents have been investigated and molecules like erythropoietin are promising.The major challenges in the treatment of TON are high spontaneous recovery rates due to the nature of the disorder and lacking of class I evidence from multi-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind studies comparing different treatment modalities.This review aimed to summarize different studies which form our preferences in treatment of TON.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) can occur by either direct injury or an indirect way which can develop secondary to transfer forces occurring due to trauma in frontal and maxillary bones to optic canal.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The clinical experiences on treatment of TON have been built on ‘National Spinal Cord Injury Study II and III2 trials rather than small cases series and the results had been found satisfactory.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:As similar to stroke and degenerative neurological disorders, the effi ciency of neuroprotective agents have been investigated and molecules like erythropoietin are promising.The major challenges in the treatment of TON are high spontaneous recovery rates due to the nature of the disorder and lacking of class I evidence from multi-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind studies comparing different treatment modalities.This review aimed to summarize different studies which form our preferences in treatment of TON.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Traumatic optic neuropathy (TON) can occur by either direct injury or an indirect way which can develop secondary to transfer forces occurring due to trauma in frontal and maxillary bones to optic canal. The involvement of productive individuals at younger age groups makes it more important. Since TON is accompanied by multiple traumas, the diagnosis of TON is generally challenging and delayed in these patients usually requiring ICU follow-up. The treatment in patients diagnosed as TON is one of the most controversial issues in neuro-ophthalmology. The clinical experiences on treatment of TON have been built on ‘National Spinal Cord Injury Study II and III2 trials rather than small cases series and the results had been found satisfactory. On the other hand, the concerns about translation of results from studies on spinal cord injury treatment to optic nerve injuries have been increased with the results of ‘International Optic Nerve Trauma Study’ showing no difference between groups underwent observation, steroid treatment or optic canal decompression. Additionally, the results from ‘Medical Research Council-Corticosteroid Randomisation After Signifi cant Head Injury’ study, which showed statistically signifi cantly higher mortality rates within fi rst two weeks of mega-dose steroid treatments compared to placebo groups, have promoted us to review our treatment protocols. As similar to stroke and degenerative neurological disorders, the effi ciency of neuroprotective agents have been investigated and molecules like erythropoietin are promising.The major challenges in the treatment of TON are high spontaneous recovery rates due to the nature of the disorder and lacking of class I evidence from multi-center, randomized, prospective, double-blind studies comparing different treatment modalities.This review aimed to summarize different studies which form our preferences in treatment of TON.

🔖

Cite This Article

GEDIK, S., EKER, S., SAHIN, A. (2020). Controversial Issues in The Treatment of Traumatic Optic Neuropathy: A Journey Through Historical Course. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 29 - Sayı: 4, 361–365. https://ajindex.com/articles/304782

References (15)

  1. Pieramici D.J, et al., A system for classifying mechanical injuries of the eye (globe). The Ocular Trauma Classifi cation Group. Am J Ophthalmol, 1997. 123: 820-31
  2. Agrawal R, et al., Controversies in ocular trauma classifi cation and management: review. Int Ophthalmol, 2013. 33: 435-45
  3. Kumaran A.M, Sundar G, Chye L.T, Traumatic optic neuropathy: a review. Craniomaxillofacial trauma & reconstruction, 2015. 8: 31-41
  4. Fujitani T, et al. Indirect traumatic optic neuropathy--visual outcome of operative and nonoperative cases. Jpn J Ophthalmol, 1986. 30: 125-34. 5. al-Qurainy I.A, et al. The characteristics of midfacial fractures and the association with ocular injury: a prospective study. Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg, 1991. 29: 291-301
  5. Volpe N.J, Levin L.A. How should patients with indirect traumatic optic neuropathy be treated? J Neuroophthalmol 2011;31:169-74
  6. Chaon B.C, Lee M.S. Is there treatment for traumatic optic neuropathy? Curr Opin Ophthalmol, 2015. 26: 445-9
  7. Zimmerer R, et al. Diagnosis and treatment of optic nerve trauma. Facial Plast Surg, 2014. 30: 518-27
  8. Yu-Wai-Man P, Griffi ths P.G. Steroids for traumatic optic neuropathy. Cochrane Database Syst Rev, 2013: Cd006032
  9. Entezari M, et al. High-dose intravenous methylprednisolone in recent traumatic optic neuropathy; a randomized double-masked placebo-controlled clinical trial. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol, 2007. 245: 1267-71
  10. Anderson R.L, Panje W.R, Gross C.E. Optic nerve blindness following blunt forehead trauma. Ophthalmology, 1982. 89: 445-55
  11. Bracken M.B, et al. A randomized, controlled trial of methylprednisolone or naloxone in the treatment of acute spinal-cord injury. Results of the Second National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. N Engl J Med, 1990. 322: 1405-11
  12. Bracken M.B, et al. Administration of methylprednisolone for 24 or 48 hours or tirilazad mesylate for 48 hours in the treatment of acute spinal cord injury. Results of the Third National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Randomized Controlled Trial. National Acute Spinal Cord Injury Study. Jama, 1997. 277: 1597-604
  13. Levin L.A, et al. The treatment of traumatic optic neuropathy: the International Optic Nerve Trauma Study. Ophthalmology, 1999. 106: 1268-77
  14. Mermut İ.Ç, et al. Bisikletler ve travmatik optik nöropati iki çocuk olgunun sunumu. İzmir Atatürk Eğitim Hastanesi Tıp Dergisi, 2009. 47: 72-5
  15. Edwards P, et al. Final results of MRC CRASH, a randomised placebo-controlled trial of i