Journals / Retina-Vitreus / 2021 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1

Systematic Approch and Ancillary Testing for Diagnosis of Papilledema and Differential Diagnosis from Pseudopapilledema

Pages
104–114
Publication Date
2022-10-17
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this review, we attempted to present important approaches that could be used for diagnosis, differential diagnosis and follow-up of papilledema and pseudopapilledema, including ancillary testing (optical coherence tomography, sonography, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance venography) in diagnosis of papilledema, differential diagnosis of papilledema-pseudopapilledema and follow up of these two diseases.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Papilledema resulting from elevated intracranial pressure is one of the important entities that need urgent evaluation in ophthalmology practice.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Although diagnosis can readily be made in established clinical presentations with advanced papilledema by experienced clinicians, differential diagnosis should be made meticulously in pediatric patients and in case of subtle edema.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this review, we attempted to present important approaches that could be used for diagnosis, differential diagnosis and follow-up of papilledema and pseudopapilledema, including ancillary testing (optical coherence tomography, sonography, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance venography) in diagnosis of papilledema, differential diagnosis of papilledema-pseudopapilledema and follow up of these two diseases.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Papilledema resulting from elevated intracranial pressure is one of the important entities that need urgent evaluation in ophthalmology practice. Although diagnosis can readily be made in established clinical presentations with advanced papilledema by experienced clinicians, differential diagnosis should be made meticulously in pediatric patients and in case of subtle edema. In particular, early papilledema must be distinguished from pseudopapilledema by clinical fi ndings and ancillary testing. In this review, we attempted to present important approaches that could be used for diagnosis, differential diagnosis and follow-up of papilledema and pseudopapilledema, including ancillary testing (optical coherence tomography, sonography, magnetic resonance imaging and magnetic resonance venography) in diagnosis of papilledema, differential diagnosis of papilledema-pseudopapilledema and follow up of these two diseases.

🔖

Cite This Article

KÜÇÜKODUK, A., GEDİK, S. (2022). Systematic Approch and Ancillary Testing for Diagnosis of Papilledema and Differential Diagnosis from Pseudopapilledema. Retina-Vitreus, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 1, 104–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/589156

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Mokri B. The Monro–Kellie hypothesis: applications in CSF volume depletion. Neurology. 2001; 56:1746-8
  2. Rigi M, Almarzouqi SJ, Morgan ML, et al. Papilledema: epidemiology, etiology, and clinical management. Eye and brain. 2015; 7:47
  3. Tekeli O. Papilödem. Türkiye Klinikleri Oftalmoloji-Özel Konular. 2009; 2:31-5
  4. Wang B, Tran H, Smith MA, et al. In-vivo effects of intraocular and intracranial pressures on the lamina cribrosa microstructure. PLOS ONE. 2017; 12:e0188302
  5. Liu KC, Fleischman D, Lee AG, et al. Current concepts of cerebrospinal fl uid dynamics and the translaminar cribrosa pressure gradient: a paradigm of optic disk disease. Surv Ophthalmol. 2020; 65:48-66
  6. Frisén L. Swelling of the optic nerve head: a staging scheme. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry. 1982; 45:13- 8
  7. Huna–Baron R, Landau K, Rosenberg M, et al. Unilateral swollen disc due to increased intracranial pressure. Neurology. 2001; 56:1588-90
  8. Hayreh SS. The sheath of the optic nerve. Ophthalmologica. 1984; 189:54-63
  9. Killer HE, Laeng HR, Flammer J, et al. Architecture of arachnoid trabeculae, pillars, and septa in the subarachnoid space of the human optic nerve: anatomy and clinical considerations. Br J Ophthalmol. 2003; 87:777-81
  10. Farrokhi Y, Sharif Kashani S, Aghsaei Fard M, et al. Optic canal size in idiopathic intracranial hypertension and asymmetric papilledema. Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2019; 184:105376
  11. Kansu T. Papilödem ve İdyopatik İntrakranial Hipertansiyon (Psödotümör Serebri). Türkiye Klinikleri Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi. 2006; 2:8-11
  12. Miller NR, Walsh FB, Hoyt WF. Walsh and Hoyt's clinical neuroophthalmology Vol 2Lippincott Williams & Wilkins; 2005
  13. Jay WM. Pediatric Neuro-Ophthalmology, by Michael C. Brodsky: New York, Springer, 2016, XXI+ 823 pages, 294 illustrations, 146 colour illustrations. $249.00, ISBN: 978-1-4939-3384- 8 (hardback); $189.00, eISBN: 978-1-4939-3384-6,(e-book). Neuro-Ophthalmology. 2017; 41:291
  14. Tuncer İ. Görme Keskinliğini Azaltan Optik Disk Druseni. Türkiye Klinikleri Oftalmoloji Dergisi. 2011; 20:44-9
  15. Oto S. Psödopapilödem. Türkiye Klinikleri Cerrahi Tıp Bilimleri Dergisi. 2006; 2:12-9
  16. Chang MY, Pineles SL. Optic disk drusen in children. Surv Ophthalmol. 2016; 61:745-58
  17. Savino PJ, Glaser JS, Rosenberg MA. A clinical analysis of pseudopapilledema. II. Visual fi eld defects. Arch Ophthalmol. 1979; 97:71-5
  18. Rangwala LM, Liu GT. Pediatric idiopathic intracranial hypertens