Journals / Praksis / 2015 / Sayı: 37

On the University, "Conflict of the Faculties", Philosophy, and a few Instances within the Neo-Liberal Age

Neo-liberal Çağda Üniversite, "Fakülteler Çatışması", Felsefe ve Birkaç Örnek Hakkında1

Journal
Praksis
Pages
241–267
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

These discussions will allow us build a relationship between two seemingly separate contexts: "neo-liberalism" and the transformation of the regime under the "current political power." In this way, we will try to answer questions regarding the universities as the representative spaces of the regime in Turkey and its transformation, the opposition against the transformation of the regime, in short, the question of "what is to be done?".

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this article we will discuss the effects of hegemony on knowledge and universities in neoliberal period.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In that, we will first discuss the issue in the context of academic freedoms and autonomy of the university; then, in the context of Nutku's objections to the organization of theology in the departments of philosophy in a way in which the discussion will remind us Kant's "Conflict of Faculties" 200 years after its publication.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:These discussions will allow us build a relationship between two seemingly separate contexts: "neo-liberalism" and the transformation of the regime under the "current political power." In this way, we will try to answer questions regarding the universities as the representative spaces of the regime in Turkey and its transformation, the opposition against the transformation of the regime, in short, the question of "what is to be done?".
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In this article we will discuss the effects of hegemony on knowledge and universities in neoliberal period. In that, we will first discuss the issue in the context of academic freedoms and autonomy of the university; then, in the context of Nutku's objections to the organization of theology in the departments of philosophy in a way in which the discussion will remind us Kant's "Conflict of Faculties" 200 years after its publication. These discussions will allow us build a relationship between two seemingly separate contexts: "neo-liberalism" and the transformation of the regime under the "current political power." In this way, we will try to answer questions regarding the universities as the representative spaces of the regime in Turkey and its transformation, the opposition against the transformation of the regime, in short, the question of "what is to be done?".

Özet

Bu makalede neo-liberal dönemde hegemonyanın bilgi ve üniversiteler üzerindeki etkisini tartısacagız. Tartısmayı ilkin akademik özgürlük ve özerk üniversite baglamında; ardından, 200 yıl sonra yeniden Kant'ın "Fakülteler Çatısması" makalesini hatırlatan bir sekilde Ulug Nutku'nun teolojinin felsefe bölümlerinde örgütlenmesine getirdigi itirazları degerlendirerek yapacagız. Bu tartısmalar bizi farklı iki baglam olarak görülebilecek "neo-liberalizm" ve "mevcut siyasal iktidar" ile rejimin dönüsümü arasında bir iliski kurmaya götürecek. Dolayısıyla Türkiye'deki rejimin ve onun dönüsümünün temsili mekânı olarak üniversitelerde görev alan bilesenlerin, rejimin dönüsümüne dair muhalefeti, kısacası "ne yapmalıyız" arayısı cevaplanmaya çalısılacak.

🔖

Cite This Article

ERDAĞI, B. (2015). On the University, "Conflict of the Faculties", Philosophy, and a few Instances within the Neo-Liberal Age. Praksis, Sayı: 37, 241–267. https://ajindex.com/articles/303094

References (14)

  1. Akkanat, H. (2009) "Uluğ Nutku'ya Cevap", Adanapost. http://www.adanapost.com/kultur-ve-sanat/5-kultur- ve-sanat/9156-qulug-nutkuya-cevapq.html Indirilme tarihi: 01.07.2010.
  2. Adamson, M. (2009) "The Financialization of Student Life", Polygraph, (21): 107-120.
  3. Apple, M. (2006) Iktidar ve Egitim, çev. E. Bulut, Istanbul: Kalkedon. Alberts, B. (2011) "Turkey and Science Academy", Science, http://www.sciencemag.org/con- tent/333/6051/1801.summary Indirilme tarihi: 02.09.2011.
  4. Badiou, A. ve S. Zizek, (2009) Felsefe ve Güncellik, çev. Ö. Aktok, Istanbul: Encore. Bécot, R. (2009) "Universities in France, Forty Years After May '68", çev. J. Izzo, Polygraph, (21): 187-203.
  5. Benjamin, W. (2004) Pasajlar, çev. A. Cemal, Istanbul: YKY. Benjamin, W. (2001) "Hikâye Anlatıcısı", Gürbilek, N. (der.), Son Bakışta Aşk içinde, Istanbul: Metis, 77-100.
  6. Callinicos, A ve C. Harman (2006). Neo-liberalizm ve Sınıf, çev. Osman Akınhay, Istanbul: Salyangoz. Charle, C. ve J. Verger, (2005) Üniversitelerin Tarihi, çev. Ismail Yerguz, Ankara:
  7. Dost. Cangızbay, K. (2002) "Görevimiz Koruma", Özgür Üniversite Forumu, (17): 39-42.
  8. Delacampagne, C. (2003) Filozof ve Tiran: Yanılsamanın Tarihi, çev. Inci Malak Uysal, Ankara:
  9. Epos. Deleuze, G. (2009) "Entelektüeller ve Iktidar", D. Lapoujade (haz.), Issız Ada ve Diğer Metinler içinde, çev. F. Taylan ve H. Yücefer, Istanbul: Baglam. Deleuze, G. (2009) "Yeni Filozoflar ve Daha Genel Bir Problem Hakkında", D. Lapoujade (haz.), İki Delilik Rejimi içinde, çev. M. E. Keskin, Istanbul: Baglam. Eagleton T. (2011) Postmodernligin Yanılsamaları, çev. Mehmet Küçük, Istanbul: Ayrıntı. Editor (2011), "A very Turkish coup", Nature, http://www.nature.com/nature/journal/v477/n7366/full/477538d. html Indirilme tarihi: 02.09.2011. Egitim ve Bilim Emekçileri Sendikası (Egitim-Sen) (2012), Egitimde AKP'nin 10 Yılı, Ankara:
  10. Egitim-Sen. Enserink, M. (2011) "Turkish Science Academy Fights Goverment Changes", Science, http://news.sciencemag. org/scienceinsider/2011/09/turkish-governmenttakes-control.html?ref=hp (Indirilme tarihi: 02.09.2011).
  11. Erdagı, B ve M. E. Dinçer (2005) "Emperyalizm Tartısmaları", felsefelogos, (27/ 28): 27-44.
  12. Erdagı, B. (2011) "Deneyim ya da Memento Vivere Yok(sun)lugu", Baykuş Felsefe Yazıları Dergisi, (7): 110-122.
  13. Ergünes, N. (2008) 1980 Sonrası Türkiye'de Bankacılık Sektörü, Istanbul: SAV. Günel, G. (2009) "The Gated Campus, Its Borderless Subjects, and the Neighborhood Nearby", Polygraph, (21): 205-214.
  14. Gözler, K. (2014) "Örnekleriyle Usûl