Journals / Praksis / 2011 / Sayı: 25

Capitalist state and the historical stream of social policing: an attempt of periodisation of state-security relations

Kapitalist devlet ve toplumsal polisliğin tarihi seyri: devlet-güvenlik ilişkisinde bir dönemlendirme denemesi

Journal
Praksis
Pages
151–179
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Consequently, in today’s phase (in authoritarian statism phase) capitalist state built a social policing which components are police that was being rised+social security that was being losed ground private security that was being rised.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The state has been become the center of security since it became the center of power.
📊
Key Findings & Data:But in its traditional form it was satisfied with dominating severely because of its despotic power and it could not really penetrate the society.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Consequently, in today’s phase (in authoritarian statism phase) capitalist state built a social policing which components are police that was being rised+social security that was being losed ground private security that was being rised.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The state has been become the center of security since it became the center of power. But in its traditional form it was satisfied with dominating severely because of its despotic power and it could not really penetrate the society. However the modern state got a capacity, that it could actually penetrate civil society and implement the political desicions logistically throughout the realm, with the administrative apparatus which it built thanks to capitalism. Thereby in its capitalist phase the state starts watching the society rather than before and thus it starts distraint the society. However, simultaneously and pradoxically the society gain a life in which it was protected and secured by the state. Accordingly the state, which turns into a real security/distraint apparatus in capitalist phase, built a social policing which composed of different components in order to establish bourgeois social order and social security during promoting itself by restructuring and transfiguring along different accumulation strategies of capitalism. In liberal state phase, which free market economy was executed, the capitalist state developed police and in interventionist state phase, which interventionism was executed, it developed social security, and in authoritarian statism phase, which neoliberal accumulation strategy was executed, it developed private security as a specific security/distaint apparatus. Consequently, in today’s phase (in authoritarian statism phase) capitalist state built a social policing which components are police that was being rised+social security that was being losed ground private security that was being rised.

Özet

Devlet, askeri gücün merkezi olmaya başladığı andan itibaren güvenliğin de merkezi olmaya başlamıştır. Ancak geleneksel formunda, sahip olduğu despotik ktidar nedeniyle katı bir tahakküm uygulamakla yetinmiş ve topluma gerçek anlamda nüfuz edememiştir. Oysa modern devlet, kapitalizm sayesinde inşa ettiği idari aygıt ile sivil topluma fiilen nüfuz etme ve siyasal kararları geniş kesimlerde lojistik olarak yürürlüğe koyabilme kapasitesi (altyapısal iktidar) kazanmıştır. Böylece devlet kapitalist aşamasında toplumu daha çok izlemeye/gözetlemeye bu anlamda da zapt etmeye başlamıştır. Ancak eşzamanlı olarak ve paradoksal bir biçimde toplum da devlet tarafından daha çok korunduğu ve güvenliğinin sağlandığı bir yaşama kavuşmuştur. Dolayısıyla kapitalizm aşamasında gerçek bir güvenlik/zapt etme aygıtına dönüşen devlet, kapitalizmin farklı birikim stratejileri boyunca yeniden yapılanarak ve biçim değiştirerek ilerledikçe de burjuva toplumsal düzenini ve toplumsal güvenliği tesis etmek üzere farklı bileşenlerden oluşan bir toplumsal polislik inşa etmiştir. Serbest piyasacılık dönemine denk düşen liberal devlet aşamasında polisi,müdahaleciliğe denk düşen müdahaleci devlet aşamasında sosyal güvenliği, neoliberal birikim stratejisine denk düşen otoriter devletçilik aşamasında ise özel güvenliği o döneme özgü yeni güvenlik/zapt etme aygıtı olarak geliştirmiştir. Sonuç olarak, kapitalist devlet bugün gelinen aşamada (otoriter devletçilik aşamasında) yükseltilen polis+geriletilen sosyal güvenlik+yükseltilen özel güvenlikten luşan bir toplumsal polislik yaratmıştır.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIRIM, E. H. (2011). Capitalist state and the historical stream of social policing: an attempt of periodisation of state-security relations. Praksis, Sayı: 25, 151–179. https://ajindex.com/articles/303041

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Adams, T. M. (1990) Bureaucrats and Beggars: French Social Policy in the Age of Enlightment, Oxford: Oxford University. Amin, S. (2008) “‘Piyasa Ekonomisi’ mi Oligopol-Finans Kapitalizmi mi?”, Montly Review, 18: 65-76.
  2. Attali, J. (2007) Geleceğin Kısa Tarihi, çev. Turhan Ilgaz, Ankara:
  3. İmge. Baran, P. A. ve P. M. Sweezy (1970) Tekelci Kapitalizm, çev. Filiz Onaran, Ankara:
  4. Doğan. Bauman, Z. (1999) Küreselleşme: Toplumsal Sonuçları, çev. Abdullah Yılmaz, İstanbul:
  5. Ayrıntı. Bayley, D. (1990) Patterns of Policing: A Comparative International Analysis, Bedfordshire: Rutgers University. Beaud, M. (2003) Kapitalizmin Tarihi, çev. Fikret Başkaya, Ankara:
  6. Dost. Beckett, K. ve S. Herbert (2008) “Dealing With Disorder: Social Control in The Post-Industrial City”, Theoretical Criminology, 12(1): 5-30.
  7. Benjamin, W. (2005) “Şiddetin Eleştirisi”, çev. Besim F. Dellaloğlu, Besim F. Dellaloğlu (der.), Benjamin içinde, İstanbul: Say, 101-124.
  8. Buğra, A. (2008)
  9. Kapitalizm, Yoksulluk ve Türkiye’de Sosyal Politika, İstanbul:
  10. İletişim. Button, M. (2007) “Assessing the Regulation of Private Security across Europe”, European Journal of Criminology, 4 (1): 109-128.
  11. Calquhoun, P. (1806a) A Treatise on the Police of the Metropolis, London: Bye and Law. Calquhoun, P. (1806b) A Treatise on Indigence: Exhibiting A General View of the National Recources for Productive Lobour, with Propositions for Amelioratign the Comdition of the Poor, London: Matchard. COESS (Confederation of European Security Services) (2004) Panoramic Overview 2004, Panoramic Overview of the Private Security Industry in the 25 Member States of the European Union-Part 2, http://www.coess.org/stats.htm, indirilme tarihi: 30.06.2007. COESS (Confederation of European Security Services) (2008) Private Security in Europe -CoESS Facts & Figures 2008-, http://www.coess.org/pdf/CoESS_Facts_ Figures_2008.pdf, indirilme tarihi: 20.04.09. Dillon, M. (1996) Politics of Security-Towards a Political Phiosophy of Continental Thought, London: Routledge. Dumenil, G. ve D. Levy (2007) “Neoliberal (Karşı) Devrim”, çev. Şeyda Başlı-Tuncel Öncel, Alff redo Saad Filho ve Deborah Johnston (der.), Neoliberalizm: Muhalif Bir Seçki içinde İstanbul: Yordam, 25-41.
  12. Ergut, F. (2004) Modern Devlet ve Polis: Osmanlı’dan Cumhuriyet’e Toplumsal Denetimin Diyalektiği, İstanbul:İletişim. Ellwood, W. (2002) Küreselleşmeyi Anlama Kılavuzu, çev. Betül Dilan Genç, İstanbul:
  13. Metis. Emsley, C. (1991) The English Police: A Political and Social History, New