Journals / Praksis / 2018 / Sayı: 46

Samizdats and Tamizdats as a Phenomenon of the Public Opposition in the Soviet Union

Sovyetler Birliği’nde Toplumsal Muhalefetin Bir Görüngüsü Olarak Samizdatlar ve Tamizdatlar

Journal
Praksis
Pages
137–154
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Therefore, with this work, it is aimed to examine the existence circumstances of the public opposition in the Soviet Union through samizdats and tamizdats, which were one of the Soviet times appearances of the Russian underground literature became a substantial course of the political and public opposition for the Russian geography.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The underground publishing, which had intensively used by the Russian opponents before the October Revolution, also preserved its feature as a significant factor of the Russian political culture, in spite of the change of its content after the revolution.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Because the ground, upon which the main structure of the Russian political culture established, consists of the conjunction of; on the one hand paternalist and authoritarian political power, which owns highly solid traditional roots, while on the other hand resistance culture, which could be germinated somehow in every condition.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Therefore, with this work, it is aimed to examine the existence circumstances of the public opposition in the Soviet Union through samizdats and tamizdats, which were one of the Soviet times appearances of the Russian underground literature became a substantial course of the political and public opposition for the Russian geography.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The underground publishing, which had intensively used by the Russian opponents before the October Revolution, also preserved its feature as a significant factor of the Russian political culture, in spite of the change of its content after the revolution. Because the ground, upon which the main structure of the Russian political culture established, consists of the conjunction of; on the one hand paternalist and authoritarian political power, which owns highly solid traditional roots, while on the other hand resistance culture, which could be germinated somehow in every condition. I this sense, one of the most important instances of the underground publishing activity fact, which was used by the Soviet era social opposition to manifest its existence and transmit its voice to the masses, is the samizdats and tamizdats medium. Therefore, with this work, it is aimed to examine the existence circumstances of the public opposition in the Soviet Union through samizdats and tamizdats, which were one of the Soviet times appearances of the Russian underground literature became a substantial course of the political and public opposition for the Russian geography.

Özet

Ekim Devrimi öncesinde devrimci Rus muhalifler tarafından yoğun bir biçimde kullanılan yeraltı yayıncılık faaliyeti, devrim sonrasındaki yıllarda değişen içeriğine rağmen, Rus siyasal kültürünün önemli bir öğesi olma özelliğini korumuştur. Çünkü, Rus politik kültürünü oluşturan ana yapının üzerine inşa edildiği zemin; bir yanda -hayli sağlam geleneksel köklere sahip- paternalist ve otoriteryan bir siyasal iktidar ile, diğer yanda her koşulda bir biçimde filizlenen direniş kültürünün biraradalığından mürekkeptir. Bu bağlam dâhilinde, Sovyet dönemi toplumsal muhalefetin varlığını ortaya koyabileceği ve sesini kitlelere iletebileceği biçimde kullandığı yeraltı yayıncılık faaliyeti olgusunun en önemli örneklerinden birisi de samizdatlar ve tamizdatlar vasatıdır. Bu nedenle de, bu çalışma ile, Rus coğrafyası için politik ve toplumsal muhalefet için mühim bir mecra olan Rus yeraltı yazının Sovyet dönemi tezahürlerinden biri olan samizdatlar ve tamizdatlar üzerinden Sovyetler Birliği’ndeki toplumsal muhalefetin varoluş koşullarının irdelenmesine çalışılacaktır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ŞAHİN, E. Y. (2018). Samizdats and Tamizdats as a Phenomenon of the Public Opposition in the Soviet Union. Praksis, Sayı: 46, 137–154. https://ajindex.com/articles/302975

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Aktay, Ş. (2014) “Sanatıyla Ekim Devrimi’ne Yön Veren Bir Şair: Vladimir Mayakovski”, Rusya’da Eylemin Sanatla Buluşması: Edebiyatta ve Sinemada Devrim, ed. G. Öksüz, İstanbul: Çeviribilim, 149-161.
  2. Artun, A. (2015) Sanatın İktidarı: 1917
  3. Devrimi, Avangard Sanat ve Müzecilik, İstanbul:
  4. İletişim. Benjamin, W. (2006) Moskova Günlüğü, çev. C. Ener, İstanbul:
  5. Metis. Billington, J. H. (1980) Fire in the Minds of Men: Origins of the Revolutionary Faith, New York: Basic. Bookchin, M. (2011) Devrimci Halk Hareketleri Tarihi 3: 1905’ten 1917’ye Rus Devrimleri, çev. A. İ. Başgül, Ankara:
  6. Dipnot. Bourdieu, P. (2014) “Özerkliğin Savunulması”, E-Skop, çev. A. Artun, 01 Şubat 2014, http://www.e-skop. com/skopbulten/ozerkligin-savunulmasi/1775, indirilme tarihi: 12.06.2017.
  7. Bourdieu, P. (1991) Language and SymbolicPower, ed. J. B. Thompson, trans. G. Raymond & M. Adam- son, Cambridge: Polity. Bourdieu, P. (1990) In Other Words: Essays Towards a Reflexive Sociology, trans. M. Adamson, Stanford: Stanford University Bushkovitch, P. (2016) Rusya’nın Kısa Tarihi, çev. M. Doğan, İstanbul:
  8. Boğaziçi Üniversitesi.
  9. Choudry, A. (2017) “Toplumsal Hareketlerin Zihinsel Emeği”, Sendika.org, çev. B. Servetoğlu, 19 Ekim 2017, http://sendika62.org/2017/10/toplumsal-hareketlerin-entelektuel-emegi-aziz-choudry/,indirilme tarihi: 19.10.2017.
  10. Cseh, K. (2013) “Rezension zu: Kind-Kovács, F., Labov, J. (Hrsg.): Samizdat, Tamizdat, and Beyond. Transnational Media During and After Socialism”, H-Soz-Kult, www.hsozkult.de/publicationrevi- ew/id/rezbuecher-20951, indirilme tarihi: 03.06.2017.
  11. Debreczeny, P. (1993) ““Zhitie Aleksandra Boldinskogo”: Pushkin’s Elevation to Sainthood in Soviet Cul- ture”, Late Soviet Culture: From Perestroika to Novostroika, ed. T. Lahusen & G. Kuperman, Durham; London: Duke University, 47-68.
  12. Dinler, D. Ş. (2017) “SSCB tarihçisi Diane Koenker’le Ekim Devrimi’nin 100. Yıldönümü”, Express (156). Etilen, (2011) “Samizdat”, 12 Nisan 2011, https://etilen.net/samizdat/, indirilme tarihi: 05.06.2017.
  13. Feindt, G. (2015) Auf der Suche nach politischer Gemeinschaft: Oppositionelles Denken zur Nation im ostmitteleuropäischen Samizdat 1976-1992, Berlin: De Gruyter Oldenbourg. Getty, J. A. (2016) Stalinizm Hükmederken: Bolşevikler, Boyarlar ve Geleneğin Ayak Direyişi, çev. G. Ç. Gü- ven, İstanbul:
  14. İletişim. Goethe, J. W. von, (1999) Urfaust, çev. A. Cemal, İstanbul:
  15. Mitos Boyut. Hosking, G. (2011) Rusya ve Ruslar: Erken Dönemden 21. Yüzyıla, çev. K. Acar, İstanbul: İletişim. İgrunov