Journals / Psychiatry and behavioral sciences (Online) / 2020 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1

Can We Predict Psychiatric Disorders at the Adolescence Period in Toddlers? A Machine Learning Approach

Pages
7–12
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In the future, the machine learning models may reveal several others are more important in terms of prognostic information and also planning treatment of toddlers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Recent studies show emotional and behavioral problems in toddler hood affecting later stages of development.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: The study group comprised 116 children (mean age: 27.4±4.4 months) who are evaluated between 2006-2007 years in a clinical setting.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In the future, the machine learning models may reveal several others are more important in terms of prognostic information and also planning treatment of toddlers.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2006-2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Recent studies show emotional and behavioral problems in toddler hood affecting later stages of development. However, the predictive factors for psychiatric disorders were not studied with machine learning methods. We aimed to examine the predictors of outcome with machine learning methods, which are novel computational methods including statistical estimation, information theories, and mathematical learning automatically discovering useful patterns in large amounts of data. Method: The study group comprised 116 children (mean age: 27.4±4.4 months) who are evaluated between 2006-2007 years in a clinical setting. Emotional and behavioral problems were assessed by the Brief Infant-Toddler Social Emotional Assessment and Child Behavior Checklist/2-3.Child psychiatry residents made follow-up evaluations with telephone calls in 2018. We tested the performance of machine learning algorithms (Decision tree, Support Vector Machine, Random Forest, Naive Bayes, Logistic Regression) on our data, including the 254 items in the baseline forms to predict psychiatric disorders in adolescence period. Results: 26.7% (n: 31) of the cases had diagnosed with a psychiatric disorder in adolescence period. In machine learning methods Random Forest outperforms other models, which had reached an accuracy of 85.2%, AUC: 0.79. Our model showed BITSEA item 20, 13, and CBCL total external problems scores filled by mother at the age of 12-36 months are the most potent factors for a psychiatric disorder in adolescence. Conclusion: We found very early behavioral and emotional problems with sociodemographic data predicted outcome significantly accurately. In the future, the machine learning models may reveal several others are more important in terms of prognostic information and also planning treatment of toddlers.

🔖

Cite This Article

USTA, M. B., KARABEKİROĞLU, M. K., SAY, G. N., GÜMÜŞ, Y. Y., AYDIN, M., ŞAHİN, B., BOZKURT, A., KARAOSMAN, T., ARAL, A., ÇOBANOĞLU, C., KURT, A. D., KESİM, N., ŞAHİN, İ. (2020). Can We Predict Psychiatric Disorders at the Adolescence Period in Toddlers? A Machine Learning Approach. Psychiatry and behavioral sciences (Online), Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 1, 7–12. https://ajindex.com/articles/302874

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Minde K. The relevance of infant psychiatry to the understanding of adult psychopathology. Can J Psychiatry 1987;32:513-7
  2. Briggs-Gowan MJ, Carter AS, Bosson-Heenan J, Guyer AE, Horwitz SM. Are infant-toddler social-emotional and behavioral problems transient? J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry 2006;45:849-58
  3. Mesman J, Bongers IL, Koot HM. Preschool developmental pathways to preadolescent internalizing and externalizing problems. J Child Psychol Psychiatry 2001;42:679-89
  4. Shaw DS, Winslow EB, Owens EB, Vondra JI, Cohn JF, Bell RQ. The development of early externalizing problems among children from low-income families: A transformational perspective. J Abnorm Child Psychol 1998;26:95-107
  5. Smith CL, Calkins SD, Keane SP, Anastopoulos AD, Shelton TL. Predicting stability and change in toddler behavior problems: Contributions of maternal behavior and child gender. Dev Psychol 2004;40:29
  6. Sitnick SL, Brennan LM, Forbes E, Shaw DS. Developmental pathways to sexual risk behavior in high-risk adolescent boys. Pediatrics 2014;133:1038
  7. Malti T, Averdijk M. Severe youth violence: Developmental perspectives introduction to the special section. Child Development 2017;88:5-15
  8. Jordan MI, Mitchell TM. Machine learning: Trends, perspectives, and prospects. Science 2015;349:255-60
  9. Gillingham P. Predictive risk modelling to prevent child maltreatment and other adverse outcomes for service users: Inside the ‘black box’of machine learning. Brit J Soc Work 2015;46:1044-58
  10. Wall D, Kosmicki J, Deluca T, Harstad E, Fusaro V. Use of machine learning to shorten observation-based screening and diagnosis of autism. Transl Psychiatry 2012;2:100
  11. Mueller A, Candrian G, Kropotov JD, Ponomarev VA, Baschera G-M, editors. Classification of ADHD patients on the basis of independent ERP components using a machine learning system. Nonlinear Biomed Phys; 2010: BioMed Central
  12. Hettige NC, Nguyen TB, Yuan C, Rajakulendran T, Baddour J, Bhagwat N, et al. Classification of suicide attempters in schizophrenia using sociocultural and clinical features: A machine learning approach. Gen Hosp Psychiatry 2017;47:20- 8
  13. Usta MB, Karabekiroglu K, Sahin B, Aydin M, Bozkurt A, Karaosman T, et al. Use of machine learning methods in prediction of short-term outcome in autism spectrum disorders. Psychiatry and Clinical Psychopharmacology 2019:29:320-5
  14. Karabekiroglu K, Uslu R, Kapci-Seyitoglu EG, Özbaran B, Öztop DB, Özel-Özcan Ö, et al. A nation