SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Rekabet Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2

inferences for Turkey in the light of new ec commission notice on remedies

At komisyonu'nun yoğunlaşmalarla ilgili yeni tedbir duyurusu ışığında Türkiye açısından çıkarımlar

Orçun SENYÜCEL
Pages
73–114
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this context, Turkish Competition Authority decisions are criticized and the steps that should be taken are recommended.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The objective of this paper is twofold.
📊
Key Findings & Data:First, this paper aims to analyze recent Commission notice on remedies acceptable under Council Regulation No 139/2004 and under Commission Regulation No 802/2004.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this context, Turkish Competition Authority decisions are criticized and the steps that should be taken are recommended.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2004 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The objective of this paper is twofold. First, this paper aims to analyze recent Commission notice on remedies acceptable under Council Regulation No 139/2004 and under Commission Regulation No 802/2004. Second and the ultimate objective is to scrutinize Turkish Competition Authority decisions on remedies in consideration of new Notice, Commission and European Courts decisions. In this context, Turkish Competition Authority decisions are criticized and the steps that should be taken are recommended.

Özet

Bu çalışmanın iki amacı bulunmaktadır. Öncelikle, AB Komisyonu’nun yoğunlaşma işlemlerine yönelik yeni tedbir duyurusunun ele alınması hedeflenmiştir. ikinci ve asıl amaç ise, Rekabet Kurulu kararlarının yeni Komisyon duyurusu, Komisyon ve AB mahkemeleri kararları göz önüne alınarak irdelenmesidir. Bu çerçevede, Rekabet Kurulu kararları eleştirilmiş ve atılması gereken adımlarla ilgili tavsiyelerde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

SENYÜCEL, O. (2009). inferences for Turkey in the light of new ec commission notice on remedies. Rekabet Dergisi, Cilt: 10 - Sayı: 2, 73–114. https://ajindex.com/articles/302773

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (6)

  1. AKSOY, N., H. BOLATOĞLU, Ş. YAVUZ (2006), "Rekabet Hukukunda Muafiyet ve Birleşme/Devralma Kararlarının Şarta Bağlanması", Rekabet Dergisi, Sayı: 25, s. 3-28.
  2. ASLAN, İ.Y. (2007), Rekabet Hukuku Teori-Uygulama-Mevzuat, 4. baskı, Ekin Kitabevi ASLAN, İ.Y. (2005), "Rekabet Kurumunun Kanun Değişikliği Önerisinin Düşündürdükleri", Rekabet Haber Bülteni, Sayı: 12, s. 3-6.
  3. BADUR, E. ve B. ERTEM (2008), "Rekabeti Sınırlayıcı Uygulamalara İlişkin İnceleme ve Araştırma Usulü", Rekabet Dergisi, Sayı: 33, s. 3-59. Best Practices on the conduct of EC merger control proceedings, http://ec.europa.eu/competitioii/mergers/legislatioiVproce Birleşme Tedbirleri Çalışması, (.Merger Remedies Study), http://ec.em-opa.eu/conipetitioii/niergers/legislati studv.pdf Birleşme Tüzüğü, Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 of 20 January 2004 on the control of concentrations between undertakings [2004] O J L 24/1 BOLATOĞLU, H. (2004), "Rekabet Kurulu Kararlarının Yargısal Denetimi", Rekabet Kurumu Uzmanlık Tezleri, Ankara 'Commitments to the European Commission', http://ec.europa.eu/competition/mergers/legislation/remedies_study.pdf Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 of 21 December 1989 on the control of concentrations between undertakings [1989] OJ L 257/90 CRAIG, P. ve G. De BURCA (2003),
  4. EU Law Text, Cases, and Materials, 3. Baskı,
  5. Oxford University Press Duyuru, Commission notice on remedies acceptable under Council Regulation (EC) No 139/2004 and under Commission Regulation (EC) No 802/2004 [2008] OJ C 267/01 Eski Duyuru, Commission Notice on remedies acceptable under Council Regulation (EEC) No 4064/89 and under Commission Regulation (EC) No 447/98 [2001] OJ C 68/3 EZRACHI, A. (2006), "Behavioural Remedies in EC Merger Control - Scope and Limitations", World Competition, No: 29(3), s. 459- 479. International Bar Association, Antitrust Commitee (2007), "Submission of the IB A Working Group on the European Commission's Draft Notice on Remedies Acceptable Under Council Regulation (EEC) No 139/2004 and Under Commission Regulation (EC) No 802/2004", http://ec. europaxu/competition/mergers/legi slati on/files remedies/iba 2.pdf FTC Çalışması (1999), A Study of the Commission's Divesture Process, http:// www, ftc. gov/os/.1999/08/divestiture. pdf GRIMALDI e ASSOCIATI (2007), "Comments of the Grimaldi e Associati on the Draft Commission Notice", http://ec.em-opa.eu/competition/mergers/legislation/files_remedies/griimldi.pdf
  6. GÜRKAYNAK, G., B. İKİLER ve A.G. YENİARAS, (2009), "Yoğunlaşmal