SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Rekabet Dergisi / 2012 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Applıcable law in foreirgn breavhs of competition

Yabancı unsurlu rekabet ihlallerinde uygulanacak hukuk

BURAK HUYSAL
Pages
69–94
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Given the structure and purpose of the competition law, the subject of the article must be analyzed beyond the classical approaches of conflicts of law by considering that the breaches can affect the markets of several states and that there is need to strike a balance between the results in public law and private law.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In parallel with the developments of international commerce, the number of international breaches of competition is increasing.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Since the international breach of competition creates effects both in private law as well as in public law, the applicable law for these breaches shall be regulated as a special rule.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Given the structure and purpose of the competition law, the subject of the article must be analyzed beyond the classical approaches of conflicts of law by considering that the breaches can affect the markets of several states and that there is need to strike a balance between the results in public law and private law.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In parallel with the developments of international commerce, the number of international breaches of competition is increasing. Since the international breach of competition creates effects both in private law as well as in public law, the applicable law for these breaches shall be regulated as a special rule. In our article, the related Turkish Private International Law regulations will be considered by the evaluation of specific conflict of laws rules methods. Given the structure and purpose of the competition law, the subject of the article must be analyzed beyond the classical approaches of conflicts of law by considering that the breaches can affect the markets of several states and that there is need to strike a balance between the results in public law and private law.

Özet

Milletlerarası ticaret alanındaki gelişmelere paralel olarak yabancı unsurlu rekabet ihlalleri de her geçen gün artmaktadır. Yabancı unsurlu rekabet ihlallerinin kamu hukuku alanındaki olduğu kadar, özel hukuk alanında da etki yaratması, bu ihlallerde uygulanacak hukuk konusunun özel olarak düzenlenmesi gerekliliğini ortaya çıkartmıştır. Çalışmamızda Türk Milletlerarası Özel Hukuku'nun konuya ilişkin düzenlemeleri, kanunlar ihtilafı kurallarının özel yöntemleriyle değerlendirilerek ele alınmaktadır. Rekabet hukuku kurallarının yapısı ve amacı dikkate alındığında, konunun kanunlar ihtilafı kurallarının klasik yaklaşımları ötesinde, kamu hukukuna ve özel hukuka ilişkin sonuçlar arasında bir denge sağlanarak ve ihlallerin birden fazla devletin pazarını etkileyebileceği göz önünde bulundurularak ele alınması gerekmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

HUYSAL, B. (2012). Applıcable law in foreirgn breavhs of competition. Rekabet Dergisi, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 69–94. https://ajindex.com/articles/302739

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (20)

  1. AKINCI, A. (2001),
  2. Rekabetin Yatay Kısıtlanması, Rekabet Kurumu Yayını, Ankara.
  3. ASHTON, D. ve C. VOLLRATH (2006) "Choice of Court and Applicable Law in Tortious Actions For Breach of Community Competition Law", ZWER No. 1, s. 1-26.
  4. ASLAN, İ. Y. (2007), Rekabet Hukuku, 4. Bası, Ankara.
  5. BASEDOW, J. (2007), "Private Enforcement of EC Competion Law: Jurisdiction and Choice of Law in the Private Enforcement of EC Competition Law", BASEDOW, J. (der.) Private Enforcement of EC Competition Law, (ed. by) International Competition Law Series, Vol. 25, Kluwer Law International, s. 229-256.
  6. ÇELİKEL, A. ve B. ERDEM (2010), Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, 11. Bası, İstanbul 2010.
  7. DICKINSON, A.(2008), The Rome II Regulation: The Law Applicable to Non-Contractual Obligations, Oxford University Press.
  8. DOĞAN, V. (2010),
  9. Milletlerarası Özel Hukuk, Ankara.
  10. EROL, K. (2000), Rekabet Kurallarının Ülke Dışı Uygulanması, Ankara.
  11. GIO, A.D. (2009), "Contract and Restitution Law and the Private Enforcement of EC Competition Law" World Competition, Vol. 32 (2), s. 199-220.
  12. GLADER, M. (2006), Innovation Markets and Competition Analysis: EU Competition Law and US Antitrust Law, Edward Elgar Publishing. GÜVEN, P. (2008)
  13. Rekabet Hukuku, Ankara.
  14. HELLNER, M. (2002), "Private International Enforcement of Competition Law, The Application of Foreign Competition Law", Yearbook of Private International Law, V. 4. İNAN, N. (2004), "4054 sayılı Rekabetin Korunması Hakkında Kanun'un Özel Hukuka İlişkin Hükümlerine Eleştirel Bir Bakış", Rekabet Hukukunda Güncel Gelişmeler Sempozyumu-I (4 Nisan 2004 Kayseri), s. 43- 67. KOMNINOS, A, (2008), EC Private Antitrust Enforcement Decentralised Application of EC Competition Law by National Courts, Oxford, Portland, Oregon, Hart Publishing. NOMER, E. (2011), Devletler Hususi Hukuku, 19. Bası, İstanbul.
  15. NOONAN, C. (2008), The Emerging Principles of International Competition Law, Oxford, Oxford University Press.
  16. ODMAN, N. A. (2002), Fikri Mülkiyet Hukuku ile Rekabet Hukukunun Teknlojik Yeniliklerin Teşvikinde Rolü, Ankara.
  17. PAPADAPULOS, A. S. (2010), The International Dimension of EU Competition Law and Policy, Cambridge University Press.
  18. PIRONON, V. (2008), "L'entree du droit de la concurrence dans le reglement Rome II: bonne mauvaise idee?", Europe 2008-2, s. 6-9.
  19. ROSCHL, J.T. (2009), "Antitrust Regulation Of Innovation Markets", ABA Antitrust Intellectual Property Conference, Berkeley, www.ftc.gov, Erişim tarihi: 05.02. 2009.
  20. SANLI, K. C. (2000), Rekabetin Korunma