SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Polis Bilimleri Dergisi / 2009 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Amerika Birlesik Devletleri'nde polis örgütlerinin suçla mücadelesinde kurumlar arası müdahale agları

Interorganizational response networks in figthing against crime by police agencies in the USA

Ali ÜNLÜ
Naim KAPUCU
Pages
47–72
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Florida Integrated Network for Data Exchange and Retrieval (FINDER) model was used as a case study for network model and information sharing in fight against crime.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Interorganizational networks are increasingly used by local law enforcement agencies in response to crime in United States and elsewhere.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Interorganizational networks help law enforcement to cope with the uncertainty of complex response operations in the local area by sharing information with other law enforcement agencies.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Florida Integrated Network for Data Exchange and Retrieval (FINDER) model was used as a case study for network model and information sharing in fight against crime.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Interorganizational networks are increasingly used by local law enforcement agencies in response to crime in United States and elsewhere. Interorganizational networks help law enforcement to cope with the uncertainty of complex response operations in the local area by sharing information with other law enforcement agencies. While it is a developing field, its root in criminal justice is different from other public organizations. The study reviews the literature on networks (network theory) and implementation of the theory in law enforcement and interoperability issues were discussed. Florida Integrated Network for Data Exchange and Retrieval (FINDER) model was used as a case study for network model and information sharing in fight against crime.

Özet

Kurumlar arası ag Amerika Birlesik Devletleri’ndeki yerel polis birimleri tarafından suçla mücadelede yaygınlasarak kullanılan bir yöntemdir. Yerel polis birimlerinin birbirleriyle bilgi paylasımıyla kurulan kurumlar arası ag, polisin karsılastıgı yetersiz bilgilenmeyi azaltmak amacıyla kullanılmaktadır. Gelisen bir alan olmasının yanında polis uygulaması ile diger kamu kurumlarının uygulaması farklılıklar göstermektedir. Bu çalısmada, teorinin gelisimi, polis tarafından uygulanması ve teorinin uygulanabilirligi konuları tartısılmaktadır. Florida Dahili Bilgi Paylasımı Agı (FINDER) modeli ise teorinin uygulanısına bir örnek olarak incelenmistir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÜNLÜ, A., KAPUCU, N. (2009). Amerika Birlesik Devletleri'nde polis örgütlerinin suçla mücadelesinde kurumlar arası müdahale agları. Polis Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 47–72. https://ajindex.com/articles/301437

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Abadinsky, Howard, (2003),
  2. Organized Crime, Belmont: Wadsworth Publishing, 7. Edition.
  3. Bailey, Darlyne and Koney, Kelly Mcnally, (2000), Strategic Alliances among Health and Human Service Organizations, From Affiliations to Consolidations, California: Sage Publications Inc. Thousand Oaks. Barabasi, Albert-László, (2002), Linked: The New Science of Networks, Cambridge: Perseus Publishing. Bardach, Eugene, (2001), “Developmental dynamics: Interagency collaboration as an emergent phenomenon”, Journal of Public Administration Research and Theory, 11/2, pp.149−164. Bruinsma, Gerben and Bernasco, Wim, (2004), “Criminal Groups and Transnational Illegal Markets: A More Detailed Examination On The Basis of Social Network Theory”, Crime, Law & Social Change, 41, pp.79–94.
  4. Burt, Ronald S., (2000), “The Network Structure of Social Capital”, in R. Sutton & B. Staw (Eds.) Research in Organizational Behavior, Westport: CT. JAI Press.
  5. Carley, Kathleen M. and Harrald, John R., (1997), “Organizational Learning under Fire, Theory and Practice”, American Behavioral Scientist, 40/3, pp.310-332.
  6. Chisholm, Rupert F., (1998), Developing Network Organizations: Learning from Practice and Theory, New York: Addison - Wesley Publishing. Department of Justice, Bureau of Justice Assistance (DOJ), (2002), Mission Possible: Strong Governance Structures for the Integration of Justice Information Systems. Retrieved on November 21, 2007 from http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/bja/192278.pdf
  7. Eglene, O'neill; Dawes, Sharon S. and Schnider, Christian A., (2007), “Authority and Leadership Patterns in Public Sector Knowledge Networks,” The American Review of Public Administration, 37/1, pp.91-113.
  8. Fedorowicz, Jane; Gogan, Janis L. and Williams, Christine B., (2007), “A Collaborative Network for First Responders: Lessons from the CapWIN case”, Government Information Quarterly, 24, pp.785–807.
  9. Field, John, (2003),
  10. Social Capital, New York: Routledge. Finder Guide, (2007), “Law Enforcement Data Sharing Consortium Information Guide”, Retrieved on November 21, 2007 from http://finder.ucf.edu/Documents/tabid/64/Default.aspx.
  11. Fountain, Jane E., (2001), Building the Virtual State: Information technology and Institutional Change, Chapter 5, Washington DC: Brookings Intuition Press. pp. 64-82.
  12. Granovetter, Mark S., (1973), “The Strength of Weak Ties,” American Journal of Sociology, 78, pp.1360-1380.
  13. Gray, Barbara, (1989),
  14. Collaborating, San Francisco: Jossey_bass Inc. Guijarro, Luis G., (2004), “Analysis of th