Journals / MN Kardiyoloji / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3

Current Approach to Myocardial Infarction in Left Bundle Branch Block

Sol Dal Bloğunda Miyokard Enfarktüsüne Yaklaşım

Pages
149–153
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

This review aim at contribute to clinicians decision in ST eleva- tional miyocard infarctus presenting with left bundle brunch block ecg.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Patients detected new left bundle brunch block and with typical chest pain suggestive for acute coronary sendrome and should be con- sidered for immediate coronary angiography.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Hence additional evaluating modified scarbossa criterias may increase both specificity and sensitivity of ST elevational miyocard infarctus diagnosis.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:This review aim at contribute to clinicians decision in ST eleva- tional miyocard infarctus presenting with left bundle brunch block ecg.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Patients detected new left bundle brunch block and with typical chest pain suggestive for acute coronary sendrome and should be con- sidered for immediate coronary angiography. Moreover patients previously known old left bundle brunch block electrocardiography and typical chest pain should be assesed for ST elevational miyocard infarctus. It is considerably challenging to diagnos ST elevational miy- ocard infarctus in patients presenting with eft bundle brunch block ecg. However scarbossa criterias developed to minimize difficulties and simplify diagnosing ST elevational miyocard infarctus. However scarbossa criterias might be insufficient, particularly not enough sensitive to diagnose ST elevational miyocard infarctus. Hence additional evaluating modified scarbossa criterias may increase both specificity and sensitivity of ST elevational miyocard infarctus diagnosis. This review aim at contribute to clinicians decision in ST eleva- tional miyocard infarctus presenting with left bundle brunch block ecg.

Özet

Tipik göğüs ağrısı olan yeni sol dal bloklu hastalarda koroner anjiyografi hemen yapılmalıdır. Ayrıca tipik göğüs ağrısı olan önceden sol dal bloğu olan hastalar, ST elevasyonlu miyokard enfarktüsü için değerlendirilmelidir. Sol dal bloğu olan hastalarda ST elevasyonlu mi- yokard enfarktüsü tanısını koymak oldukça zordur. Ancak Sgarbossa kriterleri bu zorluğu azaltmakta ve ST elevasyonlu miyokard en- farktüsü tanısını basitleştirmektedir. Ancak ST elevasyonlu miyokard enfarktüsü tanısında Sgarbossa kriterleri özellikle sensitivitenin az olması yönüyle yetersiz olabilmektedir. Dolayısı ile ilave olarak modifiye Sgarbossa kriterlerini değerlendirmek, ST elevasyonlu miyokard enfarktüsü tanısındaki özgüllüğü ve duyarlılığı artırmaktadır. Bu derleme sol dal bloğu olan hastalarda, ST elevasyonlu miyokard en- farktüsü tanısında klinisyenlerin kararına katkıda bulunmayı amaçlamaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEĞİRMENCİ, H., COŞKUN, R. (2018). Current Approach to Myocardial Infarction in Left Bundle Branch Block. MN Kardiyoloji, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 3, 149–153. https://ajindex.com/articles/297337

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (4)

  1. Ozeke O, Aras D, Deveci B, et al. Comparison of presence and extent of coronary narrowing in patients with left bun- dle branch block without diabetes mellitus to patients with and without left bundle branch block but with diabetes mellitus. Am J Cardiol 2006;97:857. Barsheshet A, Goldenberg I, Garty M, et al. Relation of bundle branch block to long-term (four-year) mortality in hospitalized patients with systolic heart failure. Am J Cardiol 2011;107:540. Shvilkin A, Ellis ER, Gervino EV, et al. Painful left bundle branch block syndrome: Clinical and electrocardiographic features and further directions for evaluation and treat- ment. Heart Rhythm 2016;13:226. Lebtahi NE, Stauffer JC, Delaloye AB. Left bundle branch block and coronary artery disease: accuracy of dipyri- damole thallium-201 single-photon emission computed tomography in patients with exercise anteroseptal perfu- sion defects. J Nucl Cardiol 1997;4(4):266-73.
  2. Ryan TJ, Anderson JL, Antman EM, et al. ACC/AHA guide- lines for the management of patients with acute myocar- dial infarction. A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee on Management of Acute Myocardial Infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 1996;28(5):1328- 428. Antman EM, Anbe DT, Armstrong PW, et al. ACC/AHA guidelines for the management of patients with ST-eleva- tion myocardial infarction; A report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines (Committee to Revise the 1999 Guidelines for the Management of patients with acute myocardial infarction). J Am Coll Cardiol 2004;44 (3):E1-E211. Steg PG, James SK, Atar D, et al. ESC Guidelines for the management of acute myocardial infarction in patients presenting with ST-segment elevation. Eur Heart J 2012;33(20):2569-61
  3. Larson DM, Menssen KM, Sharkey SW, et al. “False-posi- tive” cardiac catheterization laboratory activation among patients with suspected ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. JAMA 2007;298(23):2754-60.
  4. Jain S, Ting HT, Bell M, et al. Utility of left bundle branch block as a diagnostic criterion for acute myocardial infarc- tion. Am J Cardiol 2011;107(8):1111-6. O’Gara PT, Kushner FG, Ascheim DD, et al. 2013 ACCF/AHA Guideline for the Management of ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2013;127(4):e362-425. Sgarbossa EB,