Journals / MN Oftalmoloji / 2018 / Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4

The Short Term Results of Implantation of a Different Designed Trifocal Intraocular Lens

Farklı Tasarıma Sahip Trifokal Göz İçi Lens İmplantasyonunun Erken Dönem Sonuçları

Pages
193–198
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Implantation of Panoptix intraocular lens, provides functional uncorrected visual acuity at all distances and increases specta- cle independence with a high level of patient satisfaction.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: To evaluate the visual performance and patient satisfaction of implantation of a different designed trifocal intraocular lens.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Material and Method: The study enrolled 44 eyes of 22 patients who underwent cataract or refractive lens exchange surgery between January 2016 and November 2017 in our clinic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Implantation of Panoptix intraocular lens, provides functional uncorrected visual acuity at all distances and increases specta- cle independence with a high level of patient satisfaction.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:2016 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: To evaluate the visual performance and patient satisfaction of implantation of a different designed trifocal intraocular lens. Material and Method: The study enrolled 44 eyes of 22 patients who underwent cataract or refractive lens exchange surgery between January 2016 and November 2017 in our clinic. Exclusion criteria were the presence of other ocular pathologies, previous ocular surgery and corneal astigmatism greater than 0.75 diopter. Spherical equivalent, uncorrected and best corrected near (40 cm), intermediate (60 cm) and dis- tance (4m) visual acuity were recorded and 14- item Visual Function Questionnaire was filled out by patients at postoperative 6 th month. Results: Mean age was 56.5 ± 4.6 years (range from 20 to 85). Mean SE was 0.12 ± 0.29 diopter and all of the eyes were within + 0.50 diopter. Uncorrected near, intermediate and far distance visual acuity were 0.06 ± 0.08 LogMAR, 0.05 ± 0.05 LogMAR, 0.00 ± 0.02 LogMAR, respectively. Median score was 54.5, 55.0 and 52.0 over maximum score of 56 for the entire study group (n=22), patients operated for cataract (n=16) and patients operated for refractive lens exhange (n=6), respectively. There were no statistically difference between treatment groups(p=0.134). No difficulty during the daily activities were replied 88.6% of questionnaire items. Seven patients (31.8 %) complained of haloes and glares in the evenings. Conclusion: Implantation of Panoptix intraocular lens, provides functional uncorrected visual acuity at all distances and increases specta- cle independence with a high level of patient satisfaction.

Özet

Amaç: Farklı tasarıma sahip trifokal intraoküler lens implantasyonunun görsel sonuçlarının ve hasta memnuniyetinin değerlendirilmesi. Gereç ve Yöntem: Katarakt ve presbiyopi nedeniyle Ocak 2016 - Kasım 2017 tarihleri arasında bilateral PanOptix göz içi lens implantas- yonu yapılan 22 hastanın 44 gözü çalışmaya dahil edildi. Oküler patolojisi ve geçirilmiş oküler cerrahi öyküsü bulunan hastalar ile korneal as- tigmatizması >0,75 diyoptri olan hastalar çalışma dışı bırakıldı. Post operatif 6. ayda sferik ekivalan değerleri, düzeltilmemiş ve düzeltilmiş ya- kın (40 cm), orta (60 cm) ve uzak (4 m) mesafe görme keskinliği seviyeleri ve görsel fonksiyon anketi -14 skorları kaydedildi. Bulgular: Hastaların yaş ortalaması 56,5 ± 4,6 yıl idi. Ortalama sfer,k ekivalan altıncı ayda -0,12 ± 0,29 diyoptri olup, hastaların tümün- de sferik ekivalan + 0,50 diyoptri aralığında idi. Düzeltilmemiş yakın, orta ve uzak görme keskinlikleri sırasıyla, 0,06 ± 0,08 LogMAR, 0,05 ± 0,05 LogMAR, 0.00 ± 0,02 LogMAR olarak kaydedildi. Görsel fonksiyon anketi-14 ortanca skoru, maksimum 56 üzerinden tüm hastalarda 54,5 (n=22), katarakt grubunda (n=16) 55,0, refraktif lens değişimi grubunda 52,0 (n=6) idi. Tedavi grupları arasında hasta memnuniyeti yönünden anlamlı fark bulunmamıştır (p=0,134). Anket sorularının %88,6’sına günlük aktiviteler sırasında herhangi bir zorluk yaşanmadığı yanıtı veril- di. Yedi hasta (%31,8) geceleri halo ve glare yakınması bildirmiştir. Sonuç: Panoptix intraoküler lens implantasyonu ile tüm mesafelerde iyi görme keskinliği sağlamakta, gözlük bağımlılığını azaltmakta ve yüksek hasta memnuniyeti sunmaktadır.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZTÜRKMEN, C., ÖZCAN, E. (2018). The Short Term Results of Implantation of a Different Designed Trifocal Intraocular Lens. MN Oftalmoloji, Cilt: 25 - Sayı: 4, 193–198. https://ajindex.com/articles/295422

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Bourne RR, Stevens GA, White RA, et al, Vision Loss Expert Group. Causes of vision loss worldwide, 1990-2010: a systematic analysis. Lancet Glob Health 2013;1(6):e339-49. Thompson J, Lakhani N. Cataracts. Prim Care 2015;42:409-23. Greenbaum S. Monovision pseudophakia. J Cataract Refract Surg 2002;28(8):1439-43. de Vries NE, Nuijts RM. Multifocal intraocular lenses in cataract surgery: literature review of benefits and side effects. J Cataract Refract Surg 2013;39:268-78.
  2. Cillino G, Casuccio A, Pasti M, Bono V, Mencucci R, Cillino S. Working- age cataract patients: visual results, reading perform- ance, and quality of life with three diffractive multifocal intraoc- ular lenses. Ophthalmology 2014;121:34-44
  3. Kohnen T, Titke C, Bohm M. Trifocal intraocular lens implanta- tion to treat visual demands in various distances following lens re- moval. Am J Ophthalmol 2016;161:71-7
  4. Cochener B, Vryghem J, Rozot P, et al. Clinical outcomes with a trifocal intraocular lens: a multicenter study. J Refract Surg 2014;30:762-8. Kohnen T. First implantation of a diffractive quadrafocal (trifocal) intraocular lens. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:2330-2. AcrySof [product information]. Fort Worth, TX: Alcon Laboratories, Inc 2015.
  5. Cillino S, Casuccio A, Di Pace F, et al. One-year outcomes with new generation multifocal intraocular lenses. Ophthalmology 2008;115:1508-16. Chang DF. Prospective functional and clinical comparison of bi- lateral ReZoom and ReSTOR intraocular lenses in patients 70 years or younger. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:934-41.
  6. Alfonso JF, Fernández-Vega L, Puchades C, Montés-Micó R. Intermediate visual function with different multifocal intraocular lens models. J Cataract Refract Surg 2010;36:733-9.
  7. Jonker SM, Bauer NJ, Makhotkina NY, Berendschot TT, van den Biggelaar FJ, Nuijts RM. Comparison of a trifocal intraocular lens with a +3.0 D bifocal IOL: results of a prospective randomized clinical trial. J Cataract Refract Surg 2015;41:1631-40.
  8. Mojzis P, Kikuckova L, Majerova K, Liehneova K, Piñero DP. Comparative analysis of the visual performance after cataract sur- gery with implantation of a bifocal or trifocal diffractive IOL. J Refract Surg 2014;30:666-72.
  9. Lee S, Choi M, Xu Z, Zhao Z, Alexander E, Liu Y. Optical bench performance of a novel trifocal intraocular lens compared with a multifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:1031-8.
  10. Kohnen T, Herzog M, Hemkeppler E,et al. Visual performance of a quadrifocal (trifocal) intraocular lens followin