Journals / Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy / 2017 / Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3

Uptake Patterns of Untreated Primary Gastrointestinal Extranodal Lymphomas on Initial Staging 18F-FDG PET/CT and Metabolic Tumor Parameters

Primer Ekstranodal Gastrointestinal Sistem Lenfomalarında Primer Evreleme 18F-FDG PET/ BT’de Tutulum Paternleri ve Metabolik Tümör Parametreleri

Pages
83–92
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in lymphomas is high in terms of both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas arising from tissues other than primary lymphatic sites are classified as primary extranodal lymphomas (PEL).
📊
Key Findings & Data:The prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in lymphomas is high in terms of both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS).
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The first implications suggest they will not play a role in patient management
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2004-2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Objective: Non-Hodgkin’s lymphomas arising from tissues other than primary lymphatic sites are classified as primary extranodal lymphomas (PEL). PELs of the gastrointestinal system (PGISL) originate from the lymphatic tissues within the gastrointestinal tract. The prognostic value of 18F-FDG PET/CT in lymphomas is high in terms of both overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS). Our aim was to investigate the uptake patterns and properties of low-grade and high-grade PGISL on primary staging 18F-FDG PET/CT, as well as the prognostic significance of metabolic tumor parameters in high grade PGISL. Methods: Thirty-nine patients with PGISL were enrolled in this retrospective cohort study between 2004-2015. Primary staging 18F-FDG PET/CT have been performed and quantitative parameters of SUVmax, SUVmean, metabolic tumor volume (MTV), total lesion glycolysis (TLG) have been calculated for all patients prior to treatment. Low-grade and high-grade PGISL were compared in terms of metabolic tumor parameters. Cox regression models were performed to determine factors that correlate with DFS in high-grade PGISL.Results: There were statistically significant differences between high-grade and low-grade PGISL in terms of SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG, recurrence, mortality, DFS and OS. None of the potential risk factors (sex, age, site, SUVmax, SUVmean, MTV, TLG) for recurrence and metastasis in high grade PGISL was identified as a risk factor on univariate and multivariate Cox regression analysis. Conclusion: Metabolic tumor parameters are not predictive markers in high-grade PGISL, especially in diffuse large B cell variant and primary gastric lymphoma. The first implications suggest they will not play a role in patient management

Özet

Amaç: Primer lenfatik alanlar dışındaki dokulardan kaynaklanan Non-Hodgkin lenfomalara primer ekstranodal lenfoma (PEL) denmektedir. Gastrointestinal sistemin PEL'i (PGISL) buradaki lenfatik dokulardan köken alır. 18F-FDG PET/BT lenfomalarda genel ve hastalıksız sağkalım açısından yüksek prognostik değere sahiptir. Amacımız düşük grad ve yüksek grad PGISL'de primer evreleme 18F-FDG PET/BT'de tutulum şekillerini, özelliklerini, yüksek grad PGISL'de metabolik tümör parametrelerinin prognostik önemi ile birlikte araştırmaktır. Yöntem: 2004-2015 yılları arasında PGISL tanısı konmuş 39 hasta bu retrospektif kohort çalışmaya dahil edildi. Hastalara tedaviden önce primer evreleme 18F-FDG PET/BT çekilmiş ve maksimum standardize uptake değeri (SUVmaks), ortalama standardize uptake değeri (SUVortalama), metabolik tümör hacmi (MTV) ve total lezyon glikolizi (TLG) gibi metabolik tümör parametreleri hesaplanmıştı. Düşük grad ve yüksek grad PGISL metabolik tümör parametreleri açısından karşılaştırıldı. Yüksek grad PGISL'de Cox regresyon modelleri üzerinden hastalıksız sağkalım ile ilişkili faktörler tespit edildi.Bulgular: Düşük grad ve yüksek grad PGISL arasında SUVmaks, SUVortalama, MTV, TLG, nüks, mortalite, genel ve hastalıksız sağkalım açısından istatistiksel olarak anlamlı fark saptanmıştır. Yüksek grad PGISL'de nüks ve metastaza etki eden tüm potansiyel risk faktörlerinin (cinsiyet, yaş, site, SUVmaks, SUVortalama, MTV, TLG) tek ve çok değişkenli Cox regresyon analizinden sonra metabolik tümör parametrelerinin bir risk faktörü olmadığı görülmüştür.Sonuç: Metabolik tümör parametreleri özellikle diffüz büyük B hücreli varyant ve primer gastrik lenfoma başta olmak üzere yüksek grade PGISL'nin prognoz tahmininde faydalı değildir. İlk izlenimler hasta yönetiminde bir rolleri olamayacağı yönündedir

🔖

Cite This Article

ALAGÖZ, E., OKUYUCU, K., İNCE, S., KANTARCIOĞLU, M., ÖZAYDIN, Ş., HEPER, C., TÜRKER, T., ARSLAN, N. (2017). Uptake Patterns of Untreated Primary Gastrointestinal Extranodal Lymphomas on Initial Staging 18F-FDG PET/CT and Metabolic Tumor Parameters. Molecular Imaging and Radionuclide Therapy, Cilt: 26 - Sayı: 3, 83–92. https://ajindex.com/articles/295098

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (14)

  1. Kashyap R, Rai Mittal B, Manohar K, Balasubramanian Harisankar CN, Bhattacharya A, Singh B, Malhotra P, Varma S. Extranodal manifestations of lymphoma on [18F]FDG PET/CT: a pictorial essay. Cancer Imaging 2011;11:166-174
  2. Kumar R, Xiu Y, Potenta S, Mavi A, Zhuang H, Yu JQ, Dhurairaj T, Dadparvar S, Alavi A. 18F-FDG PET for evaluation of the treatment response in patients with gastrointestinal tract lymphomas. J Nucl Med 2004;45:1796-1803
  3. Koniaris LG, Drugas G, Katzman PJ, Salloum R. Management of gastrointestinal lymphoma. J Am Coll Surg 2003;197:127-141
  4. Al-Akwaa AM, Siddiqui N, Al-Mofleh IA. Primary gastric lymphoma. World J Gastroenterol 2004;10:5-11
  5. Radan L, Fischer D, Bar-Shalom R, Dann EJ, Epelbaum R, Haim N, Gaitini D, Israel O. FDG avidity and PET/CT patterns in primary gastric lymphoma. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2008;35:1424- 1430. 6. d’Amore F, Brincker H, Grønbaek K, Thorling K, Pedersen M, Jensen MK, Andersen E, Pedersen NT, Mortensen LS. Non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma of the gastrointestinal tract: a population-based analysis of incidence, geographic distribution, clinicopathological presentation features and prognosis. Danish Lymphoma Study Group. J Clin Oncol 1994;12:1673-1684
  6. Dodd GD. Lymphoma of the hollow abdominal viscera. Radiol Clin North Am 1990;28:771-783
  7. Gollub MJ. Imaging of gastrointestinal lymphoma. Radiol Clin North Am 2008;46:287-312
  8. Freeman C, Berg JW, Cutler SJ. Occurrence and prognosis of extranodal lymphomas. Cancer 1972;29:252-260
  9. Zucca E, Cavalli F. Extranodal lymphomas. Ann Oncol. 2000;11(Suppl 3):219-222
  10. Weihrauch MR, Dietlein M, Schicha H, Diehl V, Tesch H. Prognostic significance of 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography in lymphoma. Leuk Lymphoma 2003;44:15-22
  11. Schrepfer T, Haerle SK, Strobel K, Schaefer N, Hälg RA, Huber GF. The value of (18)F-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography/ computed tomography for staging of primary extranodal head and neck lymphomas. Laryngoscope 2010;120:937-944
  12. Spaepen K, Stroobants S, Verhoef G, Mortelmans L. Positron emission tomography with [18F]FDG for therapy response monitoring in lymphoma patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2003;30(Suppl 1):97-105
  13. Hoffmann M, Vogelsang H, Kletter K, Zettinig G, Chott A, Raderer M. 18F-fluoro-deoxy-glucose positron emission tomography (18F-FDG PET) for assessment of enteropathy-type T cell lymphoma. Gut 2003;52:347-351
  14. Phongkitkarun S, Varavithya V, Kazama T, Faria SC, Mar MV