Journals / Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi / 2017 / Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4

Validation and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy

Pages
295–300
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Understanding this aspect of epilepsy is important for reducing the burden of epilepsy, and the SSE can be used for cross cultural, media, and social campaigns aimed at minimizing the negative influences of stigma.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Introduction: We aimed to validate the Turkish version of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy (SSE) (from Brazil) and present the results.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Method: The SSE was completed by 33 patients with epilepsy (PWE), 25 of the patients’ family members, and 23 people from the community.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Understanding this aspect of epilepsy is important for reducing the burden of epilepsy, and the SSE can be used for cross cultural, media, and social campaigns aimed at minimizing the negative influences of stigma.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Introduction: We aimed to validate the Turkish version of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy (SSE) (from Brazil) and present the results. Method: The SSE was completed by 33 patients with epilepsy (PWE), 25 of the patients’ family members, and 23 people from the community. Subjects were interviewed on an individual basis; a physician read the questions and the subjects wrote the answers on a sheet. The form was the same for all subjects. In addition, the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the Hamilton Anxiety Inventory (HAI), Short Form-36 (SF-36) were completed by the subjects. Results: We interviewed 81 subjects. The internal consistency of the SSE showed Cronbach’s α coefficients of 0.785 for the PWE, 0.733 for the family members and 0.798 for the people in community. The mean scores on the SSE were 57 for patients, 66 for family members and 65 for the community where a score of 0 would suggest no stigma and 100would indicate maximum stigma. The SSE scores of patients, family members and the community who believed that patients with epilepsy are stigmatized or rejected were higher than the SSE scores of who did not believe it. Although there were strong correlation between high SSE scores and poor functionality and BDI; there were not any correlation between with SSE and HAI, age of epilepsy onset, time of epilepsy, education, and social class. Conclusion: The SSE has satisfactory content validity and high internal consistency. It allows for the quantification of the real perception of the epilepsy associated stigma. Prejudice and discrimination are often worse than the seizures themselves in terms of the impact on the daily lives of people with epilepsy and their families. Understanding this aspect of epilepsy is important for reducing the burden of epilepsy, and the SSE can be used for cross cultural, media, and social campaigns aimed at minimizing the negative influences of stigma.

🔖

Cite This Article

PAZARCI, N. K., YÜKSELEN, N. P., AYDIN, Ş., ÜNLÜSOY-ACAR, Z., ORKEN, D. N. (2017). Validation and Reliability Study of the Turkish Version of the Stigma Scale of Epilepsy. Nöropsikiyatri Arşivi, Cilt: 54 - Sayı: 4, 295–300. https://ajindex.com/articles/292836

References (16)

  1. Aziz H, Guvener A, Akhtar SW, Hasan KZ. Comparative epidemiology of epilepsy in Pakistan and Turkey: population-based studies using identical protocols. Epilepsia 1997
  2. [CrossRef] 2. Çalışır N, Bora İ, İrgil E, Boz M. Prevalence of epilepsy in Bursa city center, an urban area of Turkey. Epilepsia 2006
  3. [CrossRef] 3. Velioğlu SK, Bakırdemir M, Can G, Topbaş M. Prevalence epilepsy in northeast Turkey. Epileptic Disorder 2010
  4. Mbuba CK, Abubakar A, Odermatt P, Newton CR, Carter JA. Development and validation of the Kilifi stigma scale for Epilepsy in Kenya. Epilepsy Behav 2012
  5. [CrossRef] 5. Nancy F. Bandstra, Carol S. Camfield, Peter R. Camfield. Stigma of epilepsy. Can J Neurol Sci 2008
  6. [CrossRef] 6. Değirmenci Y, CanbazKabay S, Yılmaz Z, Bakar C, Özışık Karan HI. Perception of epilepsy in Turkey in the light of two different cities. Acta Clin Croat 2013
  7. Oto R, Apak İ, Arslan S, Yavavlı A, Altındağ A, Karaca EE. Psychosocial effects of epilepsy. Klinik Psikiyatri 2004
  8. Görgülü Ü, Fesci H. Epilepsi ile yaşam: Psychosocial effects of epilepsy. Göztepe Tıp Dergisi 2011
  9. Akçalı A, Altındağ A, Geyik S, Cansel N. Quality of life, depression, anxiety and multimensional perceived social support in patients with epilepsy. Archives of Neuropsychiatry 2009
  10. Aydemir N, Özkara Ç, Ünsal P, Canbeyli R. A Comparative study of health related quality of life, psychological well-being, impact of ıllness and stigma in epilepsy and migraine. Seizure 2011
  11. [CrossRef] 11. Dogan Ak P, Ataklı D, Yuksel B, Tekin Guveli B, Sarı H. Stigmatization and Social Impacts of Epilepsy in Turkey. Epilepsy Behav 2015
  12. [CrossRef] 12. Demirci S, Demirci K, Yürekli VA. Personality in epilepsy. SDÜ Sağlık Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi 2014
  13. Paula T. Fernandes, Priscila C.B. Salgado, Ana L.A. Noronha, Josemir W. Sander, Li M. Li. Stigma scale of epilepsy validation process. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2007
  14. 65(Supl 1):35-42. 14. Paula T. Fernandes, Ana Lúcia A. Noronha, Josemir W. Sander, Li M. Stigma scale of epilepsy the perception of epilepsy stigma in different cities in Brazil. Arq Neuropsiquiatr 2008
  15. [CrossRef] 15. Paula T. Fernandes, Priscila C. B. Salgado, Ana Lúcia A. Noronha, Fernanda D. Barbosa, Elisabete A. P. Souza, Li M. Stigma scale of epilepsy: conceptual ıssues. J Epilepsy Clin Neurophysiol 2004
  16. Demirsoy AD. T