Journals / Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

EVALUATION OF OECD COUNTRIES WITH SMAA-EDAS METHOD IN TERMS OF TELECOMMUNICATION SECTOR

OECD ÜLKELERİNİN TELEKOMÜNİKASYON SEKTÖRÜ AÇISINDAN SMAAEDAS YÖNTEMİ İLE DEĞERLENDİRİLMESİ

Pages
224–237
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

SMAA-EDAS was able to cope with effective the uncertainty in criteria measurements and weights, and obtained valid results with a confidence factor value of 99.96%.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The new and effective EDAS method, which evaluates according to the distance to the average solution, has attracted increasing attention from the academic world since 2015.
📊
Key Findings & Data:So far, several EDAS models have been developed and implemented to solve decision-making problems in many sectors.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:SMAA-EDAS was able to cope with effective the uncertainty in criteria measurements and weights, and obtained valid results with a confidence factor value of 99.96%.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:2015 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

The new and effective EDAS method, which evaluates according to the distance to the average solution, has attracted increasing attention from the academic world since 2015. So far, several EDAS models have been developed and implemented to solve decision-making problems in many sectors. In this study, we point out a limitation of EDAS, which is shared by all the EDAS-based models. Two types of inputs inherent in EDAS, i.e., criteria measurements and criteria weights are usually uncertain. To address this limitation, the SMAA-EDAS method is proposed in order to overcome the uncertainties in EDAS inputs by integrating EDAS and SMAA. With the proposed SMAA-EDAS method, OECD countries were evaluated in terms of broadband infrastructures and structural services of telecommunication sector. SMAA-EDAS was able to cope with effective the uncertainty in criteria measurements and weights, and obtained valid results with a confidence factor value of 99.96%.

Özet

Ortalama çözüme olan uzaklığa göre değerlendiren yeni ve etkili EDAS yöntemi 2015 yılından bu yana literatürde artan bir şekilde yer almaktadır. Şimdiye kadar, birçok sektörde karar verme problemlerini çözmek için çeşitli EDAS modelleri geliştirilmiş ve uygulanmıştır. Bu çalışmada, EDAS modellerinin ortak noktası olan bir EDAS sınırlaması ele alınmıştır. EDAS 'da bulunan iki girdi: alternatiflerin kriter değerleri ve kriterlerin önem ağırlıkları genellikle belirsizdir. Bu sınırlamaya çözüm getirmek için, EDAS ile SMAA entegre edilerek, EDAS' ın girdilerindeki belirsizliklerin üstesinden eşzamanlı olarak gelebilmek için SMAA-EDAS yöntemi önerilmektedir. Önerilen SMAA-EDAS yöntemi ile OECD ülkeleri telekomünikasyon sektörü geniş bant altyapıları ve yapısal hizmetleri açısından değerlendirilmiştir. Kriter ağırlıkları ve değerlerindeki belirsizlikle SMAA-EDAS % 99.96 düzeyinde güvenilirlik değeriyle etkili ve geçerli sonuçlarla başa çıkabilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÖZMEN, M. (2020). EVALUATION OF OECD COUNTRIES WITH SMAA-EDAS METHOD IN TERMS OF TELECOMMUNICATION SECTOR. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 224–237. https://ajindex.com/articles/290139

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. J. Figueira, S. Greco and M. Ehrgott, Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. New York: Springer Science & Business Media, 2005
  2. B. Roy, Paradigms and challenges. In J. Figueira, S. Greco, & M. Ehrgott (Eds.). Multiple criteria decision analysis: State of the art surveys. Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2005
  3. T. L. Saaty, “The modern science of multicriteria decision making and its practical applications: The AHP/ANP approach,” Operations Research, vol. 61, no. 5, p. 1101–1118, 2013
  4. W. Ho, X. W. Xu and P. K. Dey, “Multi-criteria decision making approaches for supplier evaluation and selection: A literature review,” European Journal of Operational Research, vol. 202, no. 1, p.16–24, 2010
  5. K. G. Mehdi, E.K. Zavadskas, L. Olfat, and Z. Turskis, “Multi-criteria inventory classification using a new method of evaluation based on distance from average solution (EDAS),” Informatica, vol. 26, no.3, p.435-451, 2015
  6. Y. Y. Li, J. Q. Wang, and T. L. Wang, “A linguistic neutrosophic multi-criteria group decision-making approach with EDAS method,” Arabian Journal for Science and Engineering, vol. 44, no. 3, p. 2737-2749, 2019
  7. J. Ouenniche, O.J.U. Perez, A. Ettouhami, A new EDAS-based in-sample-out-of-sample classifier for risk-class prediction, Management Decision, 2019
  8. M. K. Ghorabaee, M. Amiri, E. K. Zavadskas and Z. Turskis, Multi-criteria group decision-making using an extended EDAS method with interval type-2 fuzzy sets, 2017
  9. M. K. Ghorabaee, M. Amiri and E. K. Zavadskas, “A new multi-criteria model based on interval type-2 fuzzy sets and EDAS method for supplier evaluation and order allocation with environmental considerations,” Computers & Industrial Engineering, vol. 112, p. 156-174, 2017. [10]C. Kahraman, M. K. Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas, S. Cevik Onar, M. Yazdani, and B. Oztaysi, “Intuitionistic fuzzy EDAS method: an application to solid waste disposal site selection,” Journal of Environmental Engineering and Landscape Management, vol. 25, no.1, p. 1-12, 2017. [11]Z. Turskıs, Z. Morkunaite and V. Kutut, “A hybrid multiple criteria evaluation method of ranking of cultural heritage structures for renovation projects,” International journal of strategic property management, vol. 21, no.3, p.318-329, 2017. [12]M. K. Ghorabaee, E. K. Zavadskas and M. Amir “Extended EDAS method for fuzzy multi-criteria decision-making: an application to supplier selection,” International journal of computers communications