Journals / Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi / 2026 / Cilt: 18

The groundwater position on the behavior of the fully-rough strip footings

Yeraltı suyunun konumunun, tamamen pürüzlü şerit temellerin davranışına etkisi

Kaan Yünkül(TOKAT GAZİOSMANPAŞA ÜNİVERSİTESİ)0000-0003-1264-237X
Pages
—
Publication Date
2026-10-14
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The FE analysis results demonstrated that qult and cw values, and stiffness of the σ-s responses increased with increasing dw/B ratios until reaching the dc/B value.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In this study, a total of 98 comprehensive 3D parametric finite element (FE) analyses were carried out to investigate the effect of normalized water table depth (dw/B) and relative density (Dr) of the soil beneath the footing on the ultimate bearing capacity (qult), pressure-settlement (σ-s) response, correction coefficient (cw), critical failure surface depth ratio (dc/B), and failure mechanism of a fully-rough strip footing on sandy soil.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Seven different Dr values, ranging from 10% to 80% and thirteen different dw/B values, ranging from 0 to 2 as well as fully-dry condition, were preferred.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The FE analysis results demonstrated that qult and cw values, and stiffness of the σ-s responses increased with increasing dw/B ratios until reaching the dc/B value.
🔬Design:Araştırma Makalesi
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Yeraltı suyu · Şerit temel · Nihai taşıma kapasitesi

Abstract

In this study, a total of 98 comprehensive 3D parametric finite element (FE) analyses were carried out to investigate the effect of normalized water table depth (dw/B) and relative density (Dr) of the soil beneath the footing on the ultimate bearing capacity (qult), pressure-settlement (σ-s) response, correction coefficient (cw), critical failure surface depth ratio (dc/B), and failure mechanism of a fully-rough strip footing on sandy soil. Seven different Dr values, ranging from 10% to 80% and thirteen different dw/B values, ranging from 0 to 2 as well as fully-dry condition, were preferred. The FE analysis results demonstrated that qult and cw values, and stiffness of the σ-s responses increased with increasing dw/B ratios until reaching the dc/B value. Beyond this threshold, the obtained values coincided with those corresponding to fully-dry condition. It was observed that groundwater position and the Dr of the soil significantly affected the geometry and dimension of the failure surface. Furthermore, new semi-empirical equations were proposed for predicting dc/B and cw values considering internal friction angle, dw/B, effective and saturated unit weight values, showing good agreement with the findings of the FE analyses.

Özet

Bu çalışmada, kumlu zeminde tamamen pürüzlü bir şerit temelde normalize edilmiş yeraltı su tablası derinliğinin (dw/B) ve zeminin rölatif sıkılığının (Dr); nihai taşıma kapasitesi (qult), basınç-oturma (σ-s) tepkisi, düzeltme katsayısı (cw), kritik yenilme yüzeyi derinlik oranı (dc/B) ve yenilme mekanizması üzerindeki etkisinin incelenmesi amacı ile 98 kapsamlı 3 boyutlu parametrik sonlu elemanlar (FE) analizi gerçekleştirilmiştir. Analizlerde %10 ile %80 arasında değişen yedi farklı Dr değeri ve 0 ile 2 arasında değişen on üç farklı dw/B değerinin yanı sıra tamamen kuru koşullar da tercih edilmiştir. FE analiz sonuçları, dw/B oranının artmasıyla birlikte qult ve cw değerlerinin yanı sıra σ-s eğrilerinin rijitliğinin de arttığını ve bu artışın dc/B değerine ulaşıncaya kadar devam ettiğini göstermiştir. Bu eşik değerin ötesinde ise elde edilen değerler tamamen kuru koşullara karşılık gelen değerler ile örtüşmektedir. Yeraltı suyu pozisyonunun ve zeminin Dr değerinin, yenilme yüzeyinin geometrisini ve boyutunu önemli ölçüde etkilediği gözlemlenmiştir. Ayrıca, içsel sürtünme açısı, dw/B oranı ile zeminin efektif ve doygun birim hacim ağırlıklarını dikkate alan; FE analizlerinden elde edilen bulgularla yüksek uyum gösteren dc/B ve cw değerlerinin tahmini için yeni yarı-ampirik bağıntılar önerilmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

Yünkül, K. (2026). The groundwater position on the behavior of the fully-rough strip footings. Niğde Ömer Halisdemir Üniversitesi Mühendislik Bilimleri Dergisi, Cilt: 18. https://doi.org/10.28948/ngumuh.1961628

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (40)

  1. K. Terzaghi, Theoretical Soil Mechanics. 1st edition, New York, USA. Wiley, 1943.
  2. G.G. Meyerhof, “Some recent research on the bearing capacity of foundations,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 1 (1), 16-26, 1963. https://doi.org/10.1139/t63-003.
  3. J. B. Hansen, “A revised and extended formula for bearing capacity,” Danish Geotechnical Institute, 28, 5–11,1970.
  4. A. S. Vesic, “Analysis of ultimate loads of shallow foundations,” Journal of the Soil Mechanics and Foundations Division, 99 (1), 45-73, 1973. https://doi.org/10.1061/JSFEAQ.0001846.
  5. TBEC, Turkey Building Earthquake Code. Ministry of Environment and Urbanization of Türkiye, 2018.
  6. C. Chen, M. Gao, and Q. Xu, “New approach to calculate the bearing capacity of a strip shallow foundation on homogeneous soil,” Geomechanics and Geoengineering, 19 (3), 361-377, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2023.2283635.
  7. A. R. Bagherieh, and Ö. Çinicioğlu, “Bearing capacity equation for shallow foundations on unsaturated soils,” Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, 35 (3), 1-20, 2024. https://doi.org/10.18400/tjce.1248220.
  8. S. Das, and B. K. Maheshwari, “Bearing capacity of strip footings on slopes under eccentric and inclined loads,” Geotechnical and Geological Engineering, 43 (2), 93, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-024-03053-3.
  9. S. Xu, X. L. Yang, and Z. Y. Yin, “Seismic bearing capacity of rectangular foundations near slopes using the upper bound method,” Computers and Geotechnics, 182, 107133, 2025. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107133.
  10. C. M. Martin, “Exact bearing capacity calculations using the method of characteristics,” Proceedings of 11th International Conference of the International Association for Computer Methods and Advances in Geomechanics, Turin, Italy,2005
  11. J. P. Sun, Z. Y. Zhao, and Y. P. Cheng, “Bearing capacity analysis using the method of characteristics,” Acta Mechanica Sinica, 29 (2), 179-188, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10409-013-0018-1.
  12. E. Cascone, and O. Casablanca, “Static and seismic bearing capacity of shallow strip footings,” Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering, 84, 204-223, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.soildyn.2016.02.010.
  13. E. Uncuoğlu, “Tabakalı zeminlerdeki yüzeysel temel davranışının nümerik ve analitik olarak incelenmesi”, Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, 35 (2), 125-156, 2024. https://doi.org/10.18400/tjce.1259495.
  14. K. Yünkül, A. Gürbüz, and S. Demirdöğen, “The effect of aspect ratio on the shape factors of rectangular footings on sandy soil,” Turkish Journal of Civil Engineering, 37 (1), 35-63, 2026. https://doi.org/10.18400/tjce.1637258.
  15. G. G. Meyerhof, “Influence of roughness of base and ground-water conditions on the ultimate bearing capacity of foundations,” Géotechnique, 5 (3), 227-242, 1955. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.1955.5.3.227.
  16. W. Chen, W. Xia, S. Zhang, and E. Wang, “Study on the influence of groundwater variation on the bearing capacity of sandy shallow foundation,” Applied Sciences, 13 (1), 473, 2023. https://doi.org/10.3390/app13010473.
  17. S. Krishnamurthy, and N. K. Rao, “Effect of submergence on bearing capacity,” Soils and Foundations, 15 (3), 61-66, 1975. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf1972.15.3_61.
  18. E. Cascone, G. Biondi, and O. Casablanca, “Groundwater effect on bearing capacity of shallow strip footings,” Computers and Geotechnics, 139, 104417, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2021.104417.
  19. J. B. Hansen, H. Denver, and Petersen, K. “The influence of groundwater on bearing capacity of footings,” Proceedings of European Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, pp. 685-690, 1987.
  20. J. E. Bowles, Foundation Analysis and Design. McGraw-Hill, New York, 1982.
  21. E. Ausilio, and E. Conte, “Influence of groundwater on the bearing capacity of shallow foundations,” Canadian Geotechnical Journal, 42 (2), 663-672, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1139/t04-084.
  22. E. Cascone, G. Biondi, and O. Casablanca, “Influence of earthquake-induced excess pore water pressures on seismic bearing capacity of shallow foundations,” Proceedings of Earthquake Geotechnical Engineering for Protection and Development of Environment and Constructions, pp. 566-581, 2019.
  23. A. S. Reddy, and K. Manjunatha, “Influence of water table on bearing capacity of adjacent strip footings on sand exhibiting anisotropy,” Soils and Foundations, 37 (1), 53-64, 1997. https://doi.org/10.3208/sandf.37.53.
  24. J. P. Luby, and A. Woolf, “An experimental investigation of the relation between the bearing capacity of dry and wet sands,” B.Sc. Thesis, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, 1928.
  25. W. Eastwood, “A comparison of the bearing power of footings on dry and inundated sand,” Structural Engineer, 29 (1), 1-11, 1951.
  26. M. Ajdari, and A. E. Pour, “Experimental evaluation of the influence of the level of the ground water table on the bearing capacity of circular footings,” Iranian Journal of Science and Technology Transactions of Civil Engineering,39(C2+), 497-510, 2015. https://doi.org/10.22099/ijstc.2015.3516.
  27. D. Park, I. Kim, G. Kim, and J. Lee, “Groundwater effect factors for the load-carrying behavior of footings from hydraulic chamber load tests,” Geotechnical Testing Journal, 40 (3), 440-451, 2017. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ20160078
  28. A. Alencar, R. Galindo, and S. Melentijevic, “Influence of the groundwater level on the bearing capacity of shallow foundations on the rock mass,” Bulletin of Engineering Geology and the Environment, 80 (9), 6769-6779, 2021. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10064-021-02368-2.
  29. H. E. Demirci, “Geotechnical preliminary design of onshore wind turbine foundations,” Erzincan University Journal of Science and Technology, 16 (3), 756-781, 2023. https://doi.org/10.18185/erzifbed.1306867.
  30. E. Arslan, D. Kayatürk, M. R. Durmuş, İ Bağca, T. İmamoğlu, and S. Sert, “The role of utilizing load in different cases while numerical modeling of multi-story buildings on alluvial stratum: A comparison study,” Arabian Journal forScience and Engineering, 49 (10), 13845-13860, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13369-024-08800-5.
  31. S. Demirdöğen, A. Gürbüz, and K. Yünkül, “3D-printed geocells in footing systems: A comprehensive physical and numerical studies on scaling and performance under centric and eccentric loading scenarios,” Transportation Geotechnics,45,101214, 2024. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2024.101214.
  32. A. Gürbüz, K. Yünkül, S. Demirdöğen, and H. Kalkan, “Influence of aspect ratio on the performance of geocell-reinforced footings in sandy soils,” Gazi University Journal of Science, 39 (2), 974-995. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.1843545
  33. M. Gör, N. R. Taher, and H. S. Aksoy, “Behaviour of a strip footing adjacent to the existing supported excavation,” Fırat University Journal of Experimental and Computational Engineering, 2 (1), 1-11, 2023. https://doi.org/10.5505/fujece.2023.21931.
  34. Y. S. Ünsever, T. Matsumoto, and M. Y. Özkan, “Numerical analyses of load tests on model foundations in dry sand,” Computers and Geotechnics, 63, 255-266, 2015. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2014.10.005.
  35. A. H. Al-Defae, K. Caucis, and J. A. Knappett, “Aftershocks and the whole-life seismic performance of granular slopes,” Géotechnique, 63 (14), 1230-1244, 2013. https://doi.org/10.1680/geot.12.P.149.
  36. Z. Luo, X. Ding, J. Mbenza, Q. Ou, T. Zhang, and X. Zhang, “Macro-micro bearing analysis of shallow footings on geogrid reinforced coral sands considering varied geogrid properties,” Computers and Geotechnics, 189, 107606, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2025.107606.
  37. A. S. Osman, “Upper bound solutions for the shape factors of smooth rectangular footings on frictional materials,” Computers and Geotechnics, 115, 103177, 2019. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2019.103177.
  38. E. E. De Beer, “The scale effect on the phenomenon of progressive rupture in cohesionless soils,” Proceedings of 6th International Conference on Soil Mechanics and Foundation Engineering, Montreal, Canada, 1965.
  39. A. B. Cerato, and A. J. Lutenegger, “Scale effects of shallow foundation bearing capacity on granular material,” Journal of Geotechnical and Geoenvironmental Engineering, 133 (10), 1192-1202, 2007. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)1090-0241(2007)133:10(1192).
  40. M. Chakraborty, and J. Kumar, “The size effect of a conical footing on Nγ,” Computers and Geotechnics, 76, 212-221, 2016. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compgeo.2016.03.010.