SavedAdd your journal

Journals / Osteoporoz Dünyasından / 2007 / Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2

Does type 1 diabetes mellitus patients’ bone mineral density differ from healthy controls’?

Tip 1 diabetes mellituslu hastaların kemik mineral yoğunluğu sağlıklı kontrollerinkinden farklı mı?

Esma DEMİRHAN
Esma Öcal ERİMAN
AFİTAP İÇAĞASIOĞLU
Sema HALİLOĞLU
Pages
28–32
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Ostepenia was not detected in both groups. (From the World of Osteoporosis 2007;13:28-32)

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Aim: To compare the tibia and radius bone mineral density (BMD) and speed of sound (SOS) measures of type 1 DM patients and healthy controls by using Quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) (Sunlight Omnisense 7000S/8000S).
📊
Key Findings & Data:Patients and Methods: 40 type 1 DM (17 men, 23 women) and 26 healthy controls (20 women, 6 men),ranging in age from 30 to 50 years, were included in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Ostepenia was not detected in both groups. (From the World of Osteoporosis 2007;13:28-32)
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2007 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Kemik yoğunluğu · Vücut kitle indeksi · Diabetes mellitus

Abstract

Aim: To compare the tibia and radius bone mineral density (BMD) and speed of sound (SOS) measures of type 1 DM patients and healthy controls by using Quantitative ultrasonography (QUS) (Sunlight Omnisense 7000S/8000S). Patients and Methods: 40 type 1 DM (17 men, 23 women) and 26 healthy controls (20 women, 6 men),ranging in age from 30 to 50 years, were included in the study. Tibia and radius BMD of all the participants were measured by QUS. Weight and height were noted and BMI (body mass index) were calculated. DM duration, fracture story, nutrition habit and exercise story were also evaluated. Results: Mean age of type 1 DM group and control group were 36.8±5; 40.19±6.31 years respectively. Mean disease duration of type 1 DM group was: 12.4±6.63 years. Tibia T scores of type 1 DM group and control group were: 0.1±1.01; -0.4±1.37 (p=0.089) and radius T scores were -0.12±0.05; 0.05±1.17 (p=0.518) respectively. Tibia SOS values of type 1 DM group and control group were 3977.2±122.06; 3758.46±777.02 (p=0.084) and radius SOS values were 4124.7±110.23; 4163.31±119.98 (p=0.184) respectively. Conclusion: There was no significant difference between type 1 DM patients and healthy group’s tibia and radius T scores and SOS values. Ostepenia was not detected in both groups. (From the World of Osteoporosis 2007;13:28-32)

Özet

Amaç: Tip 1 diabetes mellituslu (DM) hastalar ile sağlıklı kontrollerde Kantitatif Ultrasonografi Cihazı (QUS) (Sunlight Omnisense 7000S/8000S) ile ölçülen tibia, radius kemik mineral yoğunluğu(KMY) ve ses hızı [Speed of sound (SOS)] değerlerini karşılaştırmak. Hastalar ve Yöntem: Çalışmaya yaş aralığı 30 ile 50 olan 40 tip 1 DM li (17 erkek, 23 kadın) ve 26 sağlıklı kontrol (20 kadın, 6 erkek) dahil edildi. Tüm olguların tibia ve radius kemik mineral yoğunluğu (KMY) QUS ile ölçüldü. Hastaların boy ve kiloları kaydedildi, vücut kütle indeksleri (VKİ) hesaplandı. DM süreleri, kırık hikayeleri, beslenme alışkanlıkları, egzersiz öyküleri değerlendirildi. Bulgular: Tip 1 DM grubunun ve kontrol grubunun yaş ortalaması sırasıyla 36.8±5; 40.19±6.31 yıl. Tip 1 DM grubunun hastalık süresi ortalaması: 12.4±6.63 yıl. Tip 1 DM grubunun ve kontrol grubunun tibia T skorları sırasıyla: 0.1±1.01; -0.4±1.37 (p=0.089); radius T skorları sırasıyla -0.12±0.05; 0.05±1.17 (p=0.518)bulundu. Tip 1 DM ve kontrol grubunun tibia SOS değerleri sırasıyla: 3977.2±122.06; 3758.46±777.02 (p=0.084) radius SOS değerleri sırasıyla: 4124.7±110.23; 4163.31±119.98 (p=0.184) olarak bulundu. Sonuç: Tip 1 DM li hastaların ve sağlıklıların QUS ile ölçülen tibia ve radius SOS değerleri ve T skorları arasında anlamlı fark bulunamadı. Her iki grupta da osteopeni saptanmadı. (Osteoporoz Dünyasından 2007;13:28-32)

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRHAN, E., ERİMAN, E. Ö., İÇAĞASIOĞLU, A., HALİLOĞLU, S. (2007). Does type 1 diabetes mellitus patients’ bone mineral density differ from healthy controls’?. Osteoporoz Dünyasından, Cilt: 13 - Sayı: 2, 28–32. https://ajindex.com/articles/286761

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Biberoğlu S. Sekonder Osteoporoz, Gökçe Kutsal. Osteoporoz, genişletilmiş 2. baskı; Güneş Kitabevi, Ankara 2005 p. 61;71
  2. Eskiyurt N, Diabet ve Osteoporoz, Eryavuz Sarıdoğan M,Gökçe Kutsal Y, (editors). Osteoporoz Tanı ve Tedavi Kılavuzu,Deomed Medikal Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2005, p. 105-9
  3. Ivers RQ, Cumming RG, Mitchell P, Peduto AJ. Diabetes and risk of fracture: The Blue Mountains Eye Study. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1198-203
  4. Touminen JT, Impivaara O, Puukka P, Ronnemaa T. Bone mineral density in patients with type I and type II diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999;22:1196-200
  5. Forst T, Pfutzner A, Kann P, Schehler B, Lobmann R, Schafer H, Andreas J, Bockisch A, Beyer J. Peripheral osteopenia in adult patients with insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Diabet Med 1995;12:874–9
  6. Miazgowski T, Czekalski S. A 2-year follow-up study on bone mineral density and markers of bone turnover in patients with long-standing insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus. Osteoporos Int 1998;8:399-403
  7. Liu EY, Wactawski-Wende J, Donahue RP, Dmochowski J, Hovey KM, Quattrin T. Does low bone mineral density start in post-teenage years in women with type 1 diabetes? Diabetes Care 2003;26:2365-9
  8. Nicodemus KK, Folsom AR. Iowa Women’s Health Study. Type I and type II diabetes and incident hip fractures in postmenopausal women. Diabetes Care 2001;24:1192-7
  9. Janghorbani M, Feskanich D, Willett WC, Hu F. Prospective Study of Diabetes and Risk of Hip Fracture, Diabetes Care 2006;29:1573-8
  10. Rix M, Andreassen H, Eskildsen P. Impact of peripheral neuropathy on bone density in patients with type 1 diabetes. Diabetes Care 1999;22:827-31. 11 Gökçe Kutsal Y. Görüntüleme Yöntemlerinin Tanı ve Tedavideki Yeri, Eryavuz Sarıdoğan M, Gökçe Kutsal Y, (editors). Osteoporoz Tanı ve Tedavi Kılavuzu, Deomed Medikal Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2005, p. 39-54 12. Strotmeyer ES, Cauley JA, Orchard TJ, Steenkiste AR, Dorman JS: Middle-Aged Premenopausal Women With Type 1 Diabetes Have Lower Bone Mineral Density and Calcaneal Quantitative Ultrasound Than Nondiabetic Women Diabetes Care 2006;29:306-11
  11. Schwartz AV, Sellmeyer DE, Ensrud KE, Cauley JA, Tabor HK, Schreiner PJ, Birkenhager JC, Pols HA: Older women with diabetes have an increased risk of fracture: a prospective study. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 2001; 86:32-8
  12. Bauer DC, Browner WS, Cauley JA, Orwoll ES, Scott JC, Black DM, Tao JL, Cummings SR. Factors associated with appendicular bone mass in older women. Ann Intern Med 1993;118:6