Journals / Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi / 2013 / Sayı: 38

Policies for International Students’ Education and Recommendations for Turkey

Uluslararası Öğrencilerin Eğitimine Yönelik Politikalar Ve Türkiye İçin Öneriler

Pages
97–117
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is thought that the recommendationswhich can be sorted into four diff erent dimensions as university, communicationand promotion, structural changes and legal regulations will be benefi cial inrevision and enhancement of current policies.Keywords: International student, student mobility, policies, recommendations

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Globalization mediated change and transformation in many fi elds.
📊
Key Findings & Data:As globalizationcaused dynamic transformations in economics, political foundations, sociocultural values,science and technology, one of its most signifi cant eff ects is the increase in internationalstudent mobility.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is thought that the recommendationswhich can be sorted into four diff erent dimensions as university, communicationand promotion, structural changes and legal regulations will be benefi cial inrevision and enhancement of current policies.Keywords: International student, student mobility, policies, recommendations
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Uluslararası öğrenci · öğrenci hareketliliği · politikalar

Abstract

Globalization mediated change and transformation in many fi elds. As globalizationcaused dynamic transformations in economics, political foundations, sociocultural values,science and technology, one of its most signifi cant eff ects is the increase in internationalstudent mobility. International students are sources of economic growth andhuman capital in the countries they reside. In this context developed countries competeruthlessly to increase the perceptage of international students and the developing onesare struggling to take a larger portion from the market. When the economies of themost preferred countries are studied it can be seen that they gather a large amount ofincome from international students. Th is situation shows the strategic importance ofinternational students and the necessity of it to be handled as a government policy. Th isstudy investigates the policies which pertain to the international students in developedcountries and puts forward recommendations for Turkey. It is thought that the recommendationswhich can be sorted into four diff erent dimensions as university, communicationand promotion, structural changes and legal regulations will be benefi cial inrevision and enhancement of current policies.Keywords: International student, student mobility, policies, recommendations

Özet

Küreselleşme olgusu birçok alanda değişim ve dönüşümün gerçekleşmesine aracılıketmiştir. Ekonomide, siyasal kurumlarda, sosyo-kültürel değerlerde, bilim ve teknolojidedinamik dönüşümlere neden olan küreselleşmenin eğitim alanındaki en belirginetkilerinden biri uluslararası öğrenci hareketliliğinin artmasıdır. Uluslararası öğrenciler,gittikleri ülkelere hem ekonomik gelir hem de beşeri sermaye açısından katkılar sağlamaktadır.Bu bağlamda, gelişmiş ülkeler kendi ülkelerindeki uluslararası öğrencilerinoranını yükseltmek, gelişmekte olan ülkeler ise bu pazardan daha fazla pay almak içinkıyasıya rekabet etmektedir. Eğitim için en fazla tercih edilen ülkelerin ekonomileriincelendiğinde, bu ülkelerin uluslararası öğrencilerden önemli gelirler elde ettiklerigörülmektedir. Bu durum, uluslararası öğrencilerin eğitimi konusunun bir devlet politikasıolarak ele alınması ve yürütülmesi gerektiğine işaret etmektedir. Bu çalışmada,uluslararası öğrencilerin eğitimine yönelik gelişmiş ülkelerin politikaları incelenerekTürkiye için öneriler sunulmuştur. Üniversite, iletişim ve tanıtım, yapısal değişikler veyasal düzenlemeler olmak üzere dört farklı boyutta sıralanan önerilerin bu alandakimevcut politikaların gözden geçirilmesi ve yeniden düzenlenmesi açısından faydalı olacağıdüşünülmektedir.Anahtar kelimeler: Uluslararası öğrenci, öğrenci hareketliliği, politikalar, öneriler

🔖

Cite This Article

LEVENT, A. F., KARAEVLİ, Ö. (2013). Policies for International Students’ Education and Recommendations for Turkey. Marmara Üniversitesi Atatürk Eğitim Fakültesi Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, Sayı: 38, 97–117. https://ajindex.com/articles/281436

References (11)

  1. Bakioğlu, A. & Kurnaz, Ö. (2013). Araştırmada kalite. (2. Baskı), Ankara:
  2. Nobel Akademik Yayıncılık. Berkes, N. (2011). Türkiye’de çağdaşlaşma. İstanbul:
  3. Yapı Kredi Yayınları.
  4. Bhandari, R., Belyavina, R. & Gutierrez, R. (2011). Student mobility and the internationalization of higher education: National policies and strategies from six world regions (A Project Atlas Report), New York. Bloom, D. E. (2006). Education in a globalized world. In M. Sánchez Sorondo, E. Malinvaud, & P. Léna (Eds.), Globalization and education. Proceedings from a Joint Working Group of the Pontifical Academy of Sciences and the Pontifical Academy of Social Sciences, November 2005,
  5. Vatican City. Boehm, A., Davis, T., Meares, D., & D. Pearce. (2002). Global student mobility 2025: Forecasts of the global demand for international higher education. IDP Education Australia. Brooks, R. & Waters, J. (2010). Social networks and educational mobility: the experiences of UK students, Globalisation, Societies and Education, 8(1), 143-157.
  6. Council of Ministers of Education, Canada (CMEC). (2011). Bringing education in Canada to the world, bringing the world to Canada: an international education marketing action plan for provinces and territories. http://www.cmec.ca/Publications/Lists/Publications/Attachments/264/COF_Bringing_Ed_to_Canada_Eng_final.pdf internet sitesinden 23.11.2013 tarihinde alınmıştır. Douglass, J. A. & Edelstein, R. (2009). Th e global competition for talent. Center for Studies in Higher Education Research & Occasional Paper Series: CSHE.8.09, 1-22.
  7. Forbes, L. & Hamilton, J. (2004). Building an international student market: educational-balanced scorecard solutions for regional Australian cities. International Education Journal, 5(4), 502-5
  8. Kaya, M. (2003). Beyin göçü/erozyonu. Üniversite ve Toplum, 3(3), 18-34.
  9. Kelo, M., Teichler, U. & Wächter, B. (eds.) (2006). EURODATA: Student mobility in European higher education. Bonn: Lemmens. Lee, J. L. & Rice, C. (2007). Welcome to America? International student perceptions of discrimination. Higher Education, 53, 381-409.
  10. Macready, C. & Tucker, C. (2011). Who goes where and why? An overview and analysis of global education mobility. New York: Institute of International Education. McLachlan, D. A. & Justice, J. (2009). A grounded theory of international student well-being. Th e Journal of Th eory Construction and Testing, 13(1), 27-32.
  11. Moor, B. & Henderkx, P. (2013). International curricula and student mobility. LERU: Advice Paper. No.