Journals / Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology / 2015 / Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2

Contribution of real-time elastography in diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome

Pages
118–122
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

CONCLUSIONElasticity pattern and strain ratio can help identify morpho-logical changes that make PCOS ovaries stiffer than normal ovaries

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:PURPOSEWe aimed to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of re-al-time elastography (RTE) for displaying the effects of mor-phological changes in the ovary in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).
📊
Key Findings & Data:METHODSForty-eight patients diagnosed with PCOS and 48 healthy women were enrolled in the study.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:CONCLUSIONElasticity pattern and strain ratio can help identify morpho-logical changes that make PCOS ovaries stiffer than normal ovaries
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

PURPOSEWe aimed to assess the feasibility and reproducibility of re-al-time elastography (RTE) for displaying the effects of mor-phological changes in the ovary in polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS). METHODSForty-eight patients diagnosed with PCOS and 48 healthy women were enrolled in the study. Ultrasonography and RTE were performed on the 3rd day of the menstrual cycle. Eval-uations were performed independently by two radiologists. Ovarian volume, number of follicles, elasticity pattern, and strain ratio were measured. Elasticity patterns were assessed as hard (type 1; blue or blue-green), moderate (type 2; green or green-yellow) or soft (type 3; red or orange-red). RESULTSBoth radiologists determined the elasticity pattern as mostly type 1 in the PCOS group and type 3 in the control group (P < 0.01). The mean strain ratios obtained by the first and second radiologist were 6.1±1.8 (2.7-10.1) and 6.0±1.5 (3.0-9.0) in PCOS and 3.3±1.2 (1.7-7.2) and 3.2±0.9 (1.7-6.8) in the control group, respectively (P < 0.001). Interob-server agreement was moderate for the elasticity pattern (?=0.48) and good for the strain ratio (intraclass correlation coefficient, 0.77). A strain ratio of 3.8 was determined as the optimized cutoff point by receiver operating curve analysis. Strain ratio was correlated with the ovarian volume and the number of detected follicles (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONElasticity pattern and strain ratio can help identify morpho-logical changes that make PCOS ovaries stiffer than normal ovaries

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇIRACI, S., TAN, S., ÖZCAN, A. Ş., ASLAN, A., KESKİN, H. L., ATEŞ, Ö. F., AKÇAY, Y., ARSLAN, H. (2015). Contribution of real-time elastography in diagnosis of polycystic ovary syndrome. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Cilt: 21 - Sayı: 2, 118–122. https://ajindex.com/articles/213052

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (3)

  1. Frauser BC, Tarlatzis BC, Rebar RW, et al. Consensus on women's health aspects of polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS): the Amsterdam ESHRE/ASRM-sponsored 3rd PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Fertil Steril 2012; 97:28-38. [CrossRef] Azziz R, Marin C, Hoq L, Badamgarav E, Song P. Health care-related economic burden of the polycystic ovary syndrome during the reproductive life span. J Clin Endocrinol Me- tab 2005; 90:4650-4658. [CrossRef] Ehrmann DA. Polycystic ovary syndrome. N Engl J Med 2005; 352:1223-1236. [CrossRef] Sattar N. PCOS, insulin resistance and long-term risks for diabetes and vascular disease. Br J Diabetes Vasc Dis 2009; 9:15- 18. [CrossRef] Fraser IS, Kovacs G. Current recommen- dations for the diagnostic evaluation and follow-up of patients presenting with symptomatic polycystic ovary syndrome. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol 2004; 18:813-823. [CrossRef] Lujan ME, Chizen ME, Pierson RA. Diag- nostic criteria for polycystic ovary syn- drome: pitfalls and controversies. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2008; 30:671-679.
  2. Morikawa H, Fukuda K, Kobayashi S, et al. Real-time tissue elastography as a tool for the noninvasive assessment of liver stiff- ness in patients with chronic hepatitis C. J Gastrenterol 2011; 46:350-358. [CrossRef] Jung HJ, Hahn SY, Choi HY, Park SH, Park HK. Breast sonographic elastography using an advanced breast tissue-specific imaging preset: initial clinical results. J Ultrasound Med 2012; 31:273-280.
  3. Tan S, Özcan MF, Tezcan F, et al. Real-time elastography for distinguishing angiomyo- lipoma from renal cell carcinoma: prelim- inary observations. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2013; 200:W369-375. [CrossRef] Ciledağ N, Arda K, Aktas E, Aribas BK. A pilot study on real-time transvaginal ultrasonographic elastography of cystic ovarian lesions. Indian J Med Res 2013; 137:1089-1092. Onur MR, ?im?ek BÇ, Kazez A. Sclerosing stromal tumor of the ovary: ultrasound elastography and MRI findings on preop- erative diagnosis. J Med Ultrasonics 2011; 38:217-220. [CrossRef] Rotterdam ESHRE/ASRM-Sponsored PCOS Consensus Workshop Group. Revised 2003 consensus on diagnostic criteria 20. Moon HJ, Sung JM, Kim EK, Yoon JH, and long-term health risks related to poly- cystic ovary syndrome. Fertil Steril 2004; 81:19-25. [CrossRef] Cho N, Jang M, Lyou CY, Park JS, Choi HY, Moon WK. Distinguishing benign from malignant masses at breast US: com- bined US elastography and color Doppler US - influence on radiologist accuracy. Radiology 2012; 262:80-90. [CrossRef] Zweig