Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2018 / Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1

A GENDER STUDY OR SHIFT OF BALANCE IN DAVID MAMET’S OLEANNA

A Gender Study or Shift Of Balance in David Mamet’s Oleanna

Pages
293–305
Publication Date
2018-04-10
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

In this study, one of Mamet’s most important works, Oleanna will be argued in terms of feminism, linguistics and American education system.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:One of the distinctive people in American literature and cinema, David Mamet writes a great number of plays and scripts and many of which are produced or directed by Mamet himself.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Consisting of three acts and having minimalist characterization, Oleanna concerns about John, a faculty member in a university, and his female student Carol.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:In this study, one of Mamet’s most important works, Oleanna will be argued in terms of feminism, linguistics and American education system.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Oleanna · David Mamet · feminizm

Abstract

One of the distinctive people in American literature and cinema, David Mamet writes a great number of plays and scripts and many of which are produced or directed by Mamet himself. Consisting of three acts and having minimalist characterization, Oleanna concerns about John, a faculty member in a university, and his female student Carol. Mamet primarily questions about capitalism, American education system and also tends to the subjects of sexual harassment. Even though Mamet arguing about the relationship between man and woman is criticized by many feminists, he seems to be very accomplished to indicate the deep psychology in both sexes. John who lectures in a university looks superior to his student Carol in terms of his masculinity and linguistic ability. However, this superiority relays to Carol charging him with sexual harassment. The play ends with his endeavor to manhandle her. In this study, one of Mamet’s most important works, Oleanna will be argued in terms of feminism, linguistics and American education system.

Özet

One of the distinctive persons in American literature and cinema, David Mamet writes a great number of plays and scripts and many of which are produced or directed by Mamet himself. Consisting of three acts and having minimalist characterization, Oleanna concerns about John, a faculty member in a university, and his female student Carol. Mamet primarily questions about capitalism, American education system and also tends to the subjects of sexual harassment. Even though Mamet arguing about the relationship between man and woman is criticized by many feminists, he seems to be very accomplished to indicate the deep psychology in both sexes. John who lectures in a university looks superior to his student Carol in terms of his masculinity and linguistic ability. However, this superiority relays to Carol charging him with sexual harassment. The play ends with his endeavor to manhandle her. In this study, one of Mamet’s most important works, Oleanna will be argued in terms of feminism, linguistics and American education system.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kalay, F. (2018). A GENDER STUDY OR SHIFT OF BALANCE IN DAVID MAMET’S OLEANNA. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 22 - Sayı: 1, 293–305. https://ajindex.com/articles/27910

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (8)

  1. Şeker, E. (2016). “Terör Eylemleriİ Sonrasında Türk Basını ve Yabancı Basında Yer Alan Manipülatif Söylem ve Algı Yanılsaması”. TURAN-SAM: TURAN Stratejik Araştırmalar Merkezi, (8/32), 507-513.
  2. Skloot, R. (2001). “Oleanna, or, The Play of Pedagogy” Christopher C. Hudgins & Leslie Kane (Eds.) Gender and Genre: Essays on David Mamet (95-107) New York: Palgrave Skerrett, Kathleen Roberts (2011). “Beyond “Consent”: David Mamet's Oleanna and a Hostile Environment for Souls” Studies in Gender and Sexuality, 12/4, 235-244
  3. Silverstein, M. (1995). “"We're Just Human": "Oleanna" and Cultural Crisis” South Atlantic Review, 60/2, 103-120
  4. Scanlan, R. (1993). “A Wake in the Fourth Row: Incurable Realism”. Harvard Review, 3, 98-100
  5. Sauer, D. & Sauer, J. A. (2004). “Misreading Mamet: scholarship and reviews.” Christopher Bigsby (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to David Mamet. (220-242). New York: Cambridge University Press Sauer, D. K. (2004). “Misreading Sexuality on the Post/Modern Realistic Stage.” Harold Bloom (Ed.) Bloom’s Modern Critical Views: David Mamet. (203-225). Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers Sanger, C. (1998). “The Erotics of Torts: Feminist Accused of Sexual Harassment by Jane Gallop”. Michigan Law Review 96/6, 1852-1883
  6. Quinn, M. L. (2004). “Anti-Theatricality and American Ideology: Mamet’s Performative Realism”. Harold Bloom (Ed.) Bloom’s Modern Critical Views: David Mamet (pp. 93-110). Philadelphia: Chelsea House Publishers Profile: Playwright of oaths and testosterone: David Mamet, on trial at the court of feminism (1993, 2 July) The Independent Price, S. (2004). “On Directing Mamet.” Christopher Bigsby (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to David Mamet (154-17). New York: Cambridge University Press Murphy, B. (2004). “Oleanna: language and power.” Christopher Bigsby (Ed.) The Cambridge Companion to David Mamet. (124-137). New York: Cambridge University Press Morgenstern, N. (2012). “The University in Crisis: Teaching, Tenure, and Transference in David Mamet's Oleanna”. Cultural Critique, 82/Fall, 1-33
  7. Mamet, D. (1993). Oleanna. New York: Vintage Books Mamet, D. (1987). The Woods; Lakeboat; Edmund: Three Plays. New York: Groove Press MacLeod, C. (1995). “The Politics of Gender, Language and Hierarchy in Mamet's Oleanna”. Journal of American Studies, 29/2, 199-213
  8. Piette, A. (2004). “The 1980s.” Christopher Bigsby (Ed). The Cambridge Companion to David Mamet. (74-88). New York: Cambridge University Press James, G. (2006). “Thoughts on Graduate Studio Educ