Journals / Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi / 2016 / Sayı: 17

THE EFFECT OF VISION AND ROLE CLARITY ON TEAM PERFOR

VİZYON VE ROL AÇIKLIĞININ TAKIM PERFORMANSI ÜZERİNDEKİ ETKİSİ

Pages
175–196
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

After studying the vision on a series of nine innovation teams at three companies (Apple, IBM, and HP), we empirically tested the impact of the two components of vision (Vision Clarity, and Vision Support) and Role Clarity on overall team performance.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Although many studies conclude that vision and role clarity are important at the organizational level, the impacts of vision and role clarity on innovation/teams have received far less attention.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The purpose of this research is to discuss vision components and Role Clarity, and explore their impacts on team performance.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:After studying the vision on a series of nine innovation teams at three companies (Apple, IBM, and HP), we empirically tested the impact of the two components of vision (Vision Clarity, and Vision Support) and Role Clarity on overall team performance.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Although many studies conclude that vision and role clarity are important at the organizational level, the impacts of vision and role clarity on innovation/teams have received far less attention. A strong vision and role definition can provide direction to a team and can positively impact its ability to succeed. The purpose of this research is to discuss vision components and Role Clarity, and explore their impacts on team performance. After studying the vision on a series of nine innovation teams at three companies (Apple, IBM, and HP), we empirically tested the impact of the two components of vision (Vision Clarity, and Vision Support) and Role Clarity on overall team performance. Data were collected from 75 team members. We found that Vision Clarity has a positive effect on team performance. We also found that, Vision Support and Role Clarity are not significantly related to team performance

Özet

Vizyon ve rol açıklığının organizasyonel düzeydeki önemine vurgu yapan bir çok araştırma yapılmakla birlikte, vizyon ve rol açıklığının takım performansı üzerindeki etkisiyle ilgili olarak yeterince çalışmanın yapılmadığı görülmektedir. Güçlü bir vizyon ve rol tanımı, takıma yön verebilir ve takımın performansını pozitif etkileyebilir. Bu çalışmanın amacı, vizyonun boyutlarının ve rol açıklığının önemini tartışmak ve onların takım performansı üzerindeki etkisini araştırmaktır. Bu amaç doğrultusunda, vizyonun boyutları üç şirkette (Apple, IBM, HP) bulunan dokuz inovasyon takımı üzerinde araştırıldıktan sonra, vizyonun iki boyutu (vizyonun açıklığı ve vizyona destek) ve rol açıklığının takım performansı üzerindeki etkisi ampirik olarak araştırılmıştır. Veriler 75 takım üyesinden toplanmıştır. Analizler sonucunda, vizyon açıklığının takım performansı üzerinde anlamlı ve pozitif bir etkiye sahip olduğu tespit edilmiştir. Bununla birlikte vizyona desteğin ve rol açıklığının takım performansı üzerinde anlamlı bir etkiye sahip olmadığı tespit edilmiştir

🔖

Cite This Article

LYNN, G. S., KALAY, F. (2016). THE EFFECT OF VISION AND ROLE CLARITY ON TEAM PERFOR. Uluslararası İktisadi ve İdari İncelemeler Dergisi, Sayı: 17, 175–196. https://ajindex.com/articles/322606

References (9)

  1. Agnihotri, R., Rapp, A., Kothandaraman, P. and Singh, R. K. (2012), “An Emotion-Based Model of Salesperson Ethical Behaviors”, Bus Ethics, 109, 243— 257. Anderson, N. R. and West, M. A. (1998), “Measuring Climate for Work Group Innovation: Development and Validation of the Team Climate Inventory (TCI)”, ournal of Organizational Behavior, 19, 235-25 8. Bain, P., Mann, L. and Pirola-Merlo, A. (2001), “The Innovation Imperative: The Relationships Between Team Climate, Innovation, and Performance in Research and Development Teams”, Small Group Research, 32, 55-73.
  2. Bauer, T. N., Bodner, T., Erdogan, B., Truxillo. D. M. and Tucker, J. S. (2007), “Newcomer Adjustment During Organizational Socializations: Meta-Analytic Review of Antecedents, Outcomes, and Methods”, Journal of Applied Psychology, 92, 707-7 15. Beauchamp. M. and Bray, S. (2001), “Role Ambiguity and Role Conflict Within Interdependent Teams”, Small Group Research, 32, 133-157. Bessant,., Caffyn, S. and Gallagher, M. (2001), “An Evolutionary Model of Continuous Improvement Behavior”, Technovation, 21, 67-77.
  3. Briner, W., Geddes, M. and Hastings, C. (1996),
  4. Project Leadership. Aldershot, UK: Gower. Brown, D]. and Lord, R. G. (1999), “The Utility of Experimental Research in the Study of Transformational/Charismatic Leadership”, Leadership Quarterly, 10, 53 1—539. Brown, S. L. and Eisenhardt, K. M. (1995), “Product Development: Past Research, Present Findings, and Future Directions”, Academy of Management Review, 20, 343-378.
  5. Charbonnier-Voirin, A., El Akremi, A. and Vandenberghe, C. (2010), “A Multilevel Model of Transformational Leadership and Adaptive Performance and The Moderating Role of Climate For Innovation”, Group and Organization Management, 35, 699-726.
  6. Chiessa, V., Coughland, P. and Voss, C. A. (1996), “Development of Technical Innovation Audit”, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 13, 105-136.
  7. Chin, W. W. (1998), “The Partial Least Squares Approach For Structural Equation Modelling”, In Modern Methods for Business Research, ed. G.A. Marcoulides. Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, pp. 295—336. Choi, S. Y., Lee, H. and Yoo, Y. (2010), “The Impact of Information Technol— ogy and Transactive Memory Systems on Knowledge Sharing, Application, and Team Performance: Field Study”, MIS Quarterly, 34, 855-870.
  8. Covey, S. R. (1997), “Accelerated Learning”, Executive Excellence, 14, 3-4.
  9. Crawford, M. C. and Di Benedetto, A. C. (2000), New Product Management. (sixth ed.), New York: The McGraw-H