Journals / Journal of Business Economics and Finance / 2016 / Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1

THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY

Pages
125–137
Publication Date
2016-03-30
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

However, the impact of formalization on management innovation has not been determined.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of the two core components of organizational structure, centralization and formalization, on management innovation.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In order to do this, the data received from 198 managers working in a public organization in Turkey has been analyzed.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:However, the impact of formalization on management innovation has not been determined.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Management innovation · innovation · organizational structure

Abstract

The purpose of this paper is to investigate the effect of the two core components of organizational structure, centralization and formalization, on management innovation. In order to do this, the data received from 198 managers working in a public organization in Turkey has been analyzed. The results of this analysis have demonstrated that centralization has a significant negative impact on management innovation. However, the impact of formalization on management innovation has not been determined.

🔖

Cite This Article

Kalay, F., Lynn, G. S. (2016). THE IMPACT OF ORGANIZATIONAL STRUCTURE ON MANAGEMENT INNOVATION: AN EMPIRICAL RESEARCH IN TURKEY. Journal of Business Economics and Finance, Cilt: 5 - Sayı: 1, 125–137. https://ajindex.com/articles/835148

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (16)

  1. Aiken, M., & Hage, J. (1971). The organic organization and innovation. Sociology, 5, 63-82.
  2. Bagozzi, R. P. (1981). An examination of the validity of two models of attitude. Multivariate Behavioral Research, 16(3), 323-359.
  3. Bierly, P., Damanpour, F., & Santoro, M. (2009). The application of external knowledge: Organizational conditions for exploration and exploitation. Journal of Management Studies, 46, 481–509.
  4. Birkinshaw, J., Hamel, G., & Mol, M. (2008). Management innovation. Academy of Management Review, 33, 825–845.
  5. Bolin, M., & Harenstam, A. (2008). An empirical study of bureaucratic and post-bureaucratic characteristics in 90 workplaces. Economic and Industrial Democracy, 29, 541-564.
  6. Bollen, K. A. (1989). Structural Equations with Latent Variables. New York: John Wiley & Sons. Bunderson, J. S., & Boumgarden, P. (2010). Structure and learning in self-managed teams: Why “bureaucratic” teams can be better learners. Organization Science, 21(3), 609-624.
  7. Cardinal, L. B. (2001). Technological innovation in the pharmaceutical industry: The use of organizational control in managing research and development. Organization Science, 12(1), 19-36.
  8. Caruana, A., Morris, M., & Vella, A. (1998). The effect of centralization and formalization on entrepreneurship in export firms. Journal of Small Business Management, 36(1), 16-29.
  9. Cosh, A., Fu, X., & Hughes, A. (2012). Organisation structure and innovation performance in different environments. Small Business Economics, 39, 301–317.
  10. Daft, R.L. (1978). A dual-core model of organizational innovation. Academy of Management Journal, 21(2), 193-210.
  11. Damanpour, F. (1991). Organisational innovation: A metaanalysis of effects of determinants and moderators. Academy of Management Journal, 34, 555-590.
  12. Damanpour, F. (2014). Footnotes to research on management innovation. Organization Studies, 35(9), 1265-1285.
  13. Damanpour, F., & Aravind, D. (2012). Managerial innovation: Conceptions, processes, and antecedents. Management and Organization Review, 8, 423–454.
  14. Damanpour, F., & Evan, W. M. (1984). Organizational innovation and performance: The problem of “Organizational Lag”. Administrative Science Quarterly, 29(3), 392-409.
  15. Damanpour, F., & Gopalakrishnan, S. (1998). Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: The role of environmental change. Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, 1-24.
  16. Damanpour, F., & Wischnevsky, J. D. (2006). Research on innovation in organizations: Distinguishing innovation-ge