Journals / Meme Sağlığı Dergisi / 2011 / Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1

Is MRI imaging additive to tripple test in diagnosing breast lesions

Meme lezyonlarının tanısında manyetik rezonans görüntülemenin üçlü teste katkısı var mıdır?

Pages
27–29
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Hence, in effort to diagnose the lesions with TTS of 5 the method of MRI is higly suggested.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:In an attempt to evaluate the condition of patient with (palpable) breast lesions the Triple Test Score (TTS), which includes physical examination, mammography, and fine needle aspiration biopsy, is the best clinical approach.
📊
Key Findings & Data:In cases where these three methods are well-integrated the diagnostic accuracy rate leads to 100 %.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Hence, in effort to diagnose the lesions with TTS of 5 the method of MRI is higly suggested.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

In an attempt to evaluate the condition of patient with (palpable) breast lesions the Triple Test Score (TTS), which includes physical examination, mammography, and fine needle aspiration biopsy, is the best clinical approach. In cases where these three methods are well-integrated the diagnostic accuracy rate leads to 100 %. In this study, 48 lesions in 46 patients are examined by physical examination, mammography, FNAB and MR imagining (MRI). All lesions are diagnosed histopathologically and following that MRI is compared with the TTS. The Triple Test methods were each assigned a score of 1,2,3 for benign, uncertain or malign. All lesions with TTS less than or equal to 4 were accepted as benign, and all lesions with TTS greater than or equal to 6 were accepted as malign. In order to identify all lesions with TTS equal to 5 as benign or malign, histopathological examination is needed. Of the 17 lesions with TTS less than or equal to 4 has a specifity of 100% where the MRI has a specifity of 64%. Of the 22 lesions with TTS greater than or equal to 6 has a sensitivity of 96% where the MRI has a sensitivity of 82%. However, 4 out of the 9 lesions with scores of 5 were diagnosed 1 benign and 3 malign by MRI and for 5 lesions histopathological examination is needed. Hence, in effort to diagnose the lesions with TTS of 5 the method of MRI is higly suggested.

Özet

Memede kitle tespit edilen bir hastanın değerlendirilmesinde fizik muayene, mammografi ve ince iğne aspirasyon biopsisini içeren üçlü test tanıda en iyi klinik yaklaşımdır. Her üç parametreninde uyumlu olduğu durumlarda tanısal doğruluk oranı %100’e ulaşmaktadır. Bu çalışmada 46 hastada 48 lezyon, fizik muayene, mamografi, ince iğne aspirasyon biopsisi ve MR görüntüleme ile incelendi. Tüm lezyonların histopatolojik tanısı konuldu ve takiben MR görüntüleme ile üçlü test karşılaştırıldı. Üçlü testde benign=1, şüpheli=2, malign= 3 puan verilir. Üçlü test puanı 4 ve altında olan lezyonlar benign, 6 ve üzerinde olan lezyonlar malign kabul edilir. Üçlü test puanı 5 olan olguların malign-benign ayrımı için histopatolojik tanı gerekir.Üçlü test puanı 4 ve altında olan 17 lezyonda MR görüntülemenin spesifitesi %64 iken üçlü testin spesifitesi %100 idi. Üçlü test puanı 6 ve üzerinde olan 22 lezyonda MR görüntülemenin sensivitesi %82 iken üçlü testin sensivitesi %96 dır. Ancak üçlü test puanı 5 olan 9 lezyonda MR görüntüleme ile 4 lezyona (1’i benign, 3’ü malign) olarak tanı konulmuştur ve 5 lezyonda histopatolojik tanı gerekliliği değişmemiştir. Bundan dolayı MR görüntüleme üçlü test puanı 5 olan lezyonlarda tanıya katkısı nedeni ile önerilmektedir.

🔖

Cite This Article

OKUŞ, A., DÖNMEZ, M., ERYILMAZ, M. A. (2011). Is MRI imaging additive to tripple test in diagnosing breast lesions. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 7 - Sayı: 1, 27–29. https://ajindex.com/articles/278139

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Vetto JT, Pommier RF, Schmidt WA, Eppich H, Alexander PW. Use of the triple test for palpable breast lesion yields high diagnostic accurary and cost savings. Am J Surg 1995;169:519-522 (PMID: 7747833
  2. Morris KT, Pommier RF, Morris A, Schmidt WA, Beagle G, Alexander PW, Toth-Fejel S, Schmidt J, Vetto JT. Usefulness of the triple test score for palpable breast masses. Arch Surg 2001;136:1008-1113 (PMID:11529882
  3. Morris KT, Veto JT, Petty K, Lum SS, Schmidt WA, Toth-Fejel S, Pommier RF. A new score for the evaluation of palpable breast masses in women under age 40.Am J Surg 2002; 184:346-347 (PMID: 12383898
  4. Morris A, Pommier RF, Schimidt WA, Shih RL, Alexander PW, Vetto JT. Accurate evaluation for palpable breast masses by the triple score. Arch Surg. 1998;133:930-934 (PMID: 9749842
  5. Hermansen C, Skovgaard PH, Jensen J, Langfeldt B, Steenskov V, Frederiksen P, Myhre Jensen O. Palpable breast tumours: triple diagnosis and operative strategy. Result of a prospective study. Acta Chir Scand. 1984; 150:625-628 (PMID: 6532032
  6. Mansoor I, Jamal AA. Role of fine niddle aspiration in diagnosing breast lesions. Saudi Med J. 2002; 23:915-920 (PMID: 12235462
  7. Heywang-Köbrunner SH, Dershaw DD, Schreerr I. Diagnostic imaging, second ed. Ludwisburg: Thineme.2001 8. Orel SG. MR imaging of the breast. Radiol Clin North Am 2000;38:899- 913 (PMID: 10943285
  8. Turkat TJ, Klein BD, Polan RL, Richman RH: Dynamic MR mammography:a technique for potentially reducing the biopsy rate for benign breast disease. J Magn Reson İmaging 1994; 4:563-568 (PMID: 7949682
  9. Kristoffersen Wiberg M, Apselin P, Perbeck L, Bone B. Value of MR imaging in clinical evaluation of breast lesions. Acta Radiol. 2002; 43:275-281 (PMID: 12100324
  10. Obdeijn IM, Kuijpers TJ, Van Dijk P, Wiggers T, Oudkerk M. MR lesion detection in a breast cancer population. J Magn Reson İmaging. 1996; 6:849-854 (PMID: 8956127
  11. Martelli G, Pilotti S, Coopmans de Yoldi G, Viganotti G, Fariselli G, Lepera P, Moglia D. Diagnostic efficacy of physical examination, mammography, fine needle aspiration cytology (triple test) in solid breast lumps: an analysis of 1708 consecutive cases. Tumori. 1990; 76:476-479 (PMID: 2256194
  12. Sardanelli F, Giuseppetti GM, Canavese G, Cataliotti L, Corcione S, Cossu E, Federico M, Marotti L, Martincich L, Panizza P, Podo F, Rosselli Del Turco M, Zuiani C, Alfano C, Bazzocchi M, Belli P, Bianchi S, Cilotti A, Calabrese M, Carbonaro L, Cortesi L, Di Maggio C, Del Masc