Journals / Meme Sağlığı Dergisi / 2013 / Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1

Aksilla tutulumu olmayan erken evre meme kanserli hastalarda, sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisinin güvenilirliğive etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi

Evaluation of safety and efficacy of the sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with early-stage breast cancer without axillary involvement

Pages
23–28
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Nevertheless, every medical center should perform sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection together untill getting experienced.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Purpose: In this study, sentinel lymph node identification and false negative rates were calculated and determination of the place of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the evaluation of axilla in patients with early stage breast cancer was aimed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: This prospective study was performed on 57 patients with early stage breast cancer who were treated at the Department of Sur- gery in Medical Faculty of Çukurova University between 2006-2009.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Nevertheless, every medical center should perform sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection together untill getting experienced.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2006-2009 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Purpose: In this study, sentinel lymph node identification and false negative rates were calculated and determination of the place of sentinel lymph node biopsy in the evaluation of axilla in patients with early stage breast cancer was aimed. Materials and Methods: This prospective study was performed on 57 patients with early stage breast cancer who were treated at the Department of Sur- gery in Medical Faculty of Çukurova University between 2006-2009. Blue dye technique was performed in 35 (Group I ) and the combined technique was performed in 22 patients (Group II). Axillary lymph node dissection was per- formed after sentinel lymph node biopsy on 46 patients who have invasive breast cancer. Results: Sentinel lymph node was not detected in two patients in Group I and one in Group II. Sentinel lymph node identification rate was 94.7% for all pa- tients, and it was 94.2% in Group I and 95.4% in Group II. False negative rate was 26.3% for all patients which was 22.2% in Group I and 30.0% in Group II. Sentinel lymph node identification rate was increased to 96.8% and false negative rate decreased to 0% when the first 15 patients within the learning period was excluded from the statistical analysis. Conclusion: Sentinel lymph node biopsy is a safe and effective technique on staging of axilla in patients with early stage breast cancer. Nevertheless, every medical center should perform sentinel lymph node biopsy and axillary lymph node dissection together untill getting experienced.

Özet

Amaç: Bu çalışmada klinik olarak aksilla negatif erken evre meme kanserli hastalarda sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisinin etkinliği araştırıldı. Yöntemin sen- tinel lenf nodunu bulma ve yanlış negatiflik oranları hesaplanarak erken evre meme kanserli hastalarda aksillanın değerlendirilmesinde sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisinin yerinin belirlenmesi amaçlandı. Gereç ve Yöntem: Bu prospektif çalışma, erken evre meme kanseri tanısıyla Mart 2006 – Mart 2009 tarihleri arasında Çukurova Üniversitesi Tıp Fakültesi Genel Cerrahi Anabilim Dalı’nda tedavi edilen 57 hastada yapıldı. Hastalar iki farklı gruba ayrıldı. Grup I’de 35 hastada mavi boya tekniği, Grup II’de 22 has- tada kombine teknik uygulandı. İnvaziv kanser saptanan 46 hastaya sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi sonrası aksiller lenf nodu diseksiyonu yapıldı. Bulgular: Grup I’de 2 hastada, Grup II’de 1 hastada olmak üzere toplam 3 hastada sentinel lenf nodu saptanamadı. Sentinel lenf nodu bulma oranı tüm hastalar için %94,7 olup bu oran Grup I’de %94,2 , Grup II’de %95,4 idi. Yanlış negatiflik oranı Grup I’de %22,2 , Grup II’de %30 olup tüm hastalar için %26,3 idi. Tekniği öğrenme sürecindeki ilk 15 olgu değerlendirme dışı bırakıldığında tüm grupta sentinel lenf nodu bulma oranı %96,8’e yükselirken yanlış negatiflik oranı %0’a geriledi. Sonuç-Yorum: Bu çalışmada erken evre meme kanserli hastalarda aksillanın evrelemesinde sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisinin etkin ve güvenli bir yöntem olduğu belirlendi. Her merkezin yeterli deneyim kazanıncaya kadar, sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisi ile aksiller lenf nodu diseksiyonunu beraber yapmasının daha güvenli olacağı düşünüldü.

🔖

Cite This Article

YALAV, O., DEMİRCAN, O., SAKMAN, G., ERAY, İ. C., MELEK, E., SUZAN, Z. (2013). Aksilla tutulumu olmayan erken evre meme kanserli hastalarda, sentinel lenf nodu biyopsisinin güvenilirliğive etkinliğinin değerlendirilmesi. Meme Sağlığı Dergisi, Cilt: 9 - Sayı: 1, 23–28. https://ajindex.com/articles/278044

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (7)

  1. Carter CL, Allen C, Henson DE. Relation of tumor size, lymph node status and survival in 24740 breast cancer cases. Cancer 1989;63:181- 187. (PMID:2910416
  2. McCready DR, Hortobagyi GN, Kau SW, Smith TL, Buzdar AU, Balch CM. The prognostic significance of lymph node metastases after preoperative chemotherapy for locally advanced brest cancer. Arc Surg 1989;124:21-25. (PMID:2910244
  3. Veronesi U, Paganelli G, Viale G, Luini A, Zurrida S, Galimberti V, Intra M, Veronesi P, Robertson C, Maisonneuve P, Renne G, De Cicco C, De Lucia F, Gennari R. A randomized comparison of sentinel-node biopsy with routine axillary dissection in breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2003;349:546- 55. (PMID: 12904519
  4. Foster RS. The biological and clinical significance of lymphatic metastases in breast cancer. Surg Oncol Clin North Am 1996;5:79-104. (PMID:8789495) 5.Lin PP, Allison DC, Wainstock J, Miller KD, Dooley WC, Friedman N, Baker RR. Impact of axillary lymph node dissection on the therapy of breast cancer patients. J Clin Oncol 1993;11:1536-1544. (PMID:8336192) 6.Petrek JA, Heelan MC. Incidance of breast carcinoma-related lymphedema. Cancer 1998;83:2776-2781. (PMID:9874397) 7.Boyages J, Bosch C, Langlands AO, Bilous AM, Barraclough B, Gebski VJ. Breast conservation: long-term Australian data. Int J Radial Oncol Biol Phys 1992;24:253-260. (PMID:1526864) 8.Fisher B, Wolmark N, Bauer M, Redmond C, Gebhardt M. The accuracy of clinical nodal staging and of limited axillary dissection as a determinant of histologic nodal status in carcinoma of the breast. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1981;152:765-772. (PMID:7244951) 9.Fisher B, Anderson S, Bryant J, Margolese RG, Deutsch M, Fisher ER, Jeong JH, Wolmark N. Twenty-year follow-up of a randomized trial comparing total mastectomy, lumpectomy and lumpectomy plus irradiation for the treatment of invasive breast cancer. N Engl J Med 2002; 347:1233-1241. (PMID:12393820
  5. Fisher B, Slack NH. Number of lymph nodes examined and prognosis of breast carcinoma. Surg Gynecol Obstet 1970;131:79-88. (PMID:5419966
  6. Giuliano AE, Kirgan DM, Guenther JM, Morton DL. Lymphatic mapping and sentinel lymphadenectomy for breast cancer. Ann Surg 1994; 220:391-398. (PMID:8092925
  7. Krag DN, Weaver DL, Alex JC, Fairbank JT. Surgical resection and radiolocalization of the sentinel lymph node in breast cancer using a gamma probe. Surg Oncol 1993;2:335-339. (PMID: 8130940) 13.GiulianoAE,Jones RC, Brennan M,StatmanR. Sentinellymphadenectomy in breast cancer. J Cl