Journals / Medicine Science / 2017 / Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3

The impact of gender on spouse preference in university students

Pages
436–441
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Overall, female students considered income level and personality to be important criteria for spouse selection, while their male counterparts considered sharing a similar religious identity with their spouse to be more important.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:This study aims to determine the impact gender has on the spouse preferences of university students.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Designed as descriptive and cross-sectional, the study involved a population of 2383 senior-level students at a state university.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Overall, female students considered income level and personality to be important criteria for spouse selection, while their male counterparts considered sharing a similar religious identity with their spouse to be more important.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

This study aims to determine the impact gender has on the spouse preferences of university students. Designed as descriptive and cross-sectional, the study involved a population of 2383 senior-level students at a state university. As the study was planned to include all students from the said year-level at the university, no sample group was selected for the study. The study ended up being completed with a total of 1491 students. Data were evaluated using the chi square test and the independent samples t-test. Results from the study found that in terms of spouse selection criteria, a good personality (94.9%) and a high educational level (56.6%) were more important to female students than they were to male students (p<0.05). On the other hand, having a high income (20%) and a good job (22.8%) were shown to be less important to male students than they were to female students (p<0.05). Sharing a similar religious identity with their spouses was more significant for male students than it was for female students (p<0.05). Of the female students, 71.6% reported that they wanted to have a flirting period with their spouses before marriage, while of the male students, only 61.2% wanted the same (p<0.001). Overall, female students considered income level and personality to be important criteria for spouse selection, while their male counterparts considered sharing a similar religious identity with their spouse to be more important. The differences in spouse selection criteria between female and male students were determined to be a consequence of the students’ understanding of gender norms

🔖

Cite This Article

TAŞHAN, S. T., ÇALIŞKAN, Z., NACAR, G., ERGİN, I. O. (2017). The impact of gender on spouse preference in university students. Medicine Science, Cilt: 6 - Sayı: 3, 436–441. https://ajindex.com/articles/277452

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (17)

  1. Bener M. Relationship of religius ness-partner choice (SDU sample). Ph.D. thesis, Süleyman Demirel Üniversitesi, Isparta, 2011
  2. Bozgeyikli H, Toprak E. University youth’s mate selection criteria by rank order judgments scaling. Gençlik Araştırmaları Dergisi. 2013;1(1):68-87
  3. Haskan Avcı Ö. Problems, University students experience in their relationship and topics they want to be educated on before marriage. Ege Eğitim Dergisi. 2014;15(1):279-99
  4. Türkarslan N, Süleymanov A. The ideas and points of views of the last grade university students on marriage–a comparison of Azerbaijan and Turkey. Karadeniz Blacksea-ChornoyeMore. 2010;54-66
  5. Güngen Y, Tokyürek Ş, Şanlı N. Home and family life management
  6. Baskı. Pegem Yayıncılık, İstanbul 2002;115-7
  7. Yatkın N. Marriage at Islam and preference of the religiosity in the selection of partners. Atatürk Üniversitesi İlahiyat Fakültesi Dergisi. 2010;33:47-61
  8. Bugay A, Tezer E. The criterias that the graduate students seek their partners. Dokuz Eylül Üniversitesi Buca Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2008;23:36-40
  9. Buunk Bram P, Dijkstra P, Fetchenhauer D, Kenrick Douglas T. Age and gender differences in mate selection criteria for various involvement levels. Personal Relationships. 2002;9:271–8
  10. Johannesen-Schmidt MC, Eagly AH. Another look at sex differences in preferred mate characteristics: the effects of endorsing the traditional female gender role. Psychology of Women Quarterly. 2002;26:322–8
  11. Farajzadeh N. Turkish and Iranian university students' views on peer selection. Ph.D. thesis, Gazi Üniversitesi, Ankara, 2011. 11. 1Badahdah AM, Tiemann KA. Mate selection criteria among Muslims living in America. Evolution and Human Behavior. 2004:26:432–40
  12. Yıldırım İ. Student selection criteria for üniversity students. Türk Psikolojik Danışma ve Rehberlik Dergisi. 2007;3(27):15-26
  13. Koçak R. Analysis of marital satisfaction levels of school administrators according to various variables. SAÜ Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi. 2008;127-39
  14. Shackelford TK, Schmitt DP, Buss DM. Universal dimensions of human mate preferences. Personality and Individual Differences. 2005;39:447–58
  15. Çakır L. The matter of parity (equality) in marriage in the sources of Islamic low and its reflection on current Turkish society. Ph.D. thesis, Çukurova Üniversitesi, Adana, 2006
  16. Bacanlı H. Value preferences of üniversity students. Kuram ve Uygulamalada Eğitim Yönetimi. 1999;5(4):597-611
  17. Marriage Preferences in