AI Summary & Key Takeaways
AI InsightIn selected acetabular fracture cases with proper planning according to fracture type, in early period, surgery may lead to satisfactory results in terms of patient satisfaction and hip functions.
📌 3 Key Takeaways
Özet
The aim of the study was to evaluate the type of trauma, additional injury, age, additional diseases, need for ICU and blood transfusion, postoperative complications, mid-term patient satisfaction and hip functions of the patients who underwent surgical treatment for acetabulum fracture in our clinic. A total of 17 patients (15 males, 2 females, mean age 40,7 years ) who admitted to the emergency department between 2013 and 2016, and treated surgically due to acetabulum fractures were included in the study. According to Judet Letournel classification, 7 anterior wall fractures, 4 anterior column fractures, 3 posterior column fractures and 3 both column fractures were determined. Mean hospital stay was 14.5 days (range 3-45 days) and mean follow-up was 26 months (14 to 57 months). ICU needed in 3 (17.6%) cases, mean stay was 10.3 days (range 1-29 days). 6 (35.2%) patients required blood transfusion, mean amount was 4.1 units (range 2-6 units). Harris hip scores were excellent - good in 12 cases (70.5%) and 5 cases (29.5%) had moderate - poor results at 12th month. There was no statistically significant relationship between severity of trauma, type of injury, age, additional diseases, intensive care and blood transfusion requirements, postoperative complications and patient satisfaction (p> 0.05). In selected acetabular fracture cases with proper planning according to fracture type, in early period, surgery may lead to satisfactory results in terms of patient satisfaction and hip functions.