Journals / Medicine Science / 2019 / Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2

Efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept therapy in diabetic macular edema

Pages
412–417
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Functionally and anatomically, intravitreal aflibercept injection therapy in diabetic macular edema is an effective treatment option because it improves visual acuity and decreases central macular thickness.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:To conduct a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept treatment in diabetic macular edema.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Three injections were administered to the previously untreated 76 eyes of 50 patients for 3 consecutive months with one-month interval.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Functionally and anatomically, intravitreal aflibercept injection therapy in diabetic macular edema is an effective treatment option because it improves visual acuity and decreases central macular thickness.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

To conduct a retrospective evaluation of the efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept treatment in diabetic macular edema. Patients treated with intravitreal aflibercept for diabetic macular edema participated in this study. Three injections were administered to the previously untreated 76 eyes of 50 patients for 3 consecutive months with one-month interval. The results were evaluated retrospectively by analyzing the patients’ medical records. The patients’ values of ‘‘best corrected visual acuity” inverted according to Snellen chart, and their central macular thickness and intraocular pressure were compared before and after treatment. The average age of the patients was 57.2 ± 10.1. Of the cases, 77.6% were phakic, and 22.4 % were pseudophakic. The increases in “best corrected visual acuity” in the first month after each injection and at the end of the third month were statistically significant (p < 0.001). The mean central macular thickness was 405.63 ± 106.93 μm before treatment and 288.83 ± 62.49 μm after the third injection. This reduction in the mean central macular thickness was statistically significant (p < 0.05). During and after the three-month follow-up of the injection application process, the most common observed ocular side effect was subconjunctival hemorrhage (34.2%). During or after the applications, no systemic side effects, such as sudden death, thromboembolic events, or myocardial infarction, were seen. Functionally and anatomically, intravitreal aflibercept injection therapy in diabetic macular edema is an effective treatment option because it improves visual acuity and decreases central macular thickness.

🔖

Cite This Article

ASLAN, A. C., ERDENOZ, S., CAKİR, A., ERDEN, B., Akpolat, Ç., ELCİOĞLU, M. (2019). Efficacy and safety of intravitreal aflibercept therapy in diabetic macular edema. Medicine Science, Cilt: 8 - Sayı: 2, 412–417. https://ajindex.com/articles/277000

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (13)

  1. Klein R, Klein BEK, Moss SE, et al. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy IV: diabetic macular edema. Ophthalmol. 1984;91:1464–74.
  2. Kalantzis G, Angelou M, Poulokau E. Diabetic retinopathy: an historical assessment. Hormones (Athens). 2006;5:72–5.
  3. Ola M, Nawaz M, Siddiquei M, et al. Recent advances in understanding the biochemical and molecular mechanism of diabetic retinopathy. J Diabetes Complications. 2012;26:56-64.
  4. Aiello LP, Gardner TW, King GL, et al. Diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 1998;21:143-56.
  5. Klein R, Klein B, Moss S, et al. The Wisconsin epidemiologic study of diabetic retinopathy. XIV. Ten-year incidence and progression of diabetic retinopathy. Arch Ophthalmol. 1994;112:1217-28. The Diabetic Retinopathy Study Research Group. Photocoagulation treatment of proliferative diabetic retinopathy: The second report of diabetic retinopathy study findings. Ophthalmology. 1978;85:82-106.
  6. Klein R, Klein B. Epidemioloy of proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Diabetes Care. 1992;1875-91.
  7. Hikichi T, Fujio N, Akiba Y, et al. Association between the short-term natural history of diabetic macular edema and the vitreomacular relationship. Ophthalmology. 1997; 104:473-8.
  8. Williams R, Airey M, Baxter H et al. Epidemiology of diabetic retinopathy and macular oedema: a systematic review. Eye. 2004;18:963-83.
  9. Ishikawa H, Stein DM, Wollstein G, et al. Macular segmentation with optical coherence tomography. Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci. 2005;46:2012-7.
  10. Kurt MM, Çekiç O, Akpolat Ç, Elçioglu M. Effects of intravitreal ranibizumab and bevacizumab on the retinal vessel size in diabetic macular edema. Retina. 2018;38:1120-6.
  11. Tetikoğlu M, Kurt MM, Sağdık HM, et al. Retrospective analysis of the effect of aflibercept loading dose on the retinal vessel diameters in patients with treatment-naive neovascular AMD. Cutan Ocul Toxicol. 2018; 37:84-9.
  12. Osaadon P, Fagan XJ, Lifshitz T, et al. A review of antiVEGF agents for proliferative diabetic retinopathy. Eye (Lond). 2014;28:510–20. Photocoagulation for diabetic macular edema. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study Report Number 1. Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study research group. Arch OphthalmolArch Ophthalmol. 1985;103:1796806. Vincenti V, Cassano C, Rocchi M, et al. Assignment of the vascular endothelial growth factor gene to human chromosome 6p21.3. Circulation. 1996;93:1493-5.
  13. Senger D, Galli S, Dvorak A, et al. Tumor cells secrete a vascular permeability factor that promotes accumulation of a