Journals / Memleket Siyaset Yönetim / 2020 / Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 33

THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POPULISM –DEMOCRACY in TURKEY: AN EVALUATION ON 24th JUNE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

TÜRKİYE’DE POPÜLİZM -DEMOKRASİİLİŞKİSİ: 24 HAZİRAN CUMHURBAŞKANLIĞI SEÇİMLERİ ÜZERİNE BİR DEĞERLENDİRME

Pages
141–180
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

For this purpose, speeches during 24th June presidential election that made by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan who was the candidate of the ruling party AKP (Justice and Development Party) that is representing the Turkey’s right-wing political axis and Muharrem İnce who was the candidate of the opposition party CHP (Republican People’s Party) that is representing the Turkey’s left-wing politi-cal axis, was examined by using Essex School Discourse Analysis method.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Populism is one of the most referenced concepts in both economic and polit-ical analysis in the past decades but what is semantically controversial.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The representation crisis and economic crises, in which politics in general and lib-eral democracy in particular, and the structural transformations brought along with these crises strengthened the tendency towards populism.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:For this purpose, speeches during 24th June presidential election that made by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan who was the candidate of the ruling party AKP (Justice and Development Party) that is representing the Turkey’s right-wing political axis and Muharrem İnce who was the candidate of the opposition party CHP (Republican People’s Party) that is representing the Turkey’s left-wing politi-cal axis, was examined by using Essex School Discourse Analysis method.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Abstract

Populism is one of the most referenced concepts in both economic and polit-ical analysis in the past decades but what is semantically controversial. The representation crisis and economic crises, in which politics in general and lib-eral democracy in particular, and the structural transformations brought along with these crises strengthened the tendency towards populism. Popu-lism, which has turned into a kind of shadow of democracy, is fed by the ten-sions between democracy and liberalism to a great extent.In this study, Populism was tackled as a form of discourse which enables to political actors to want to obtain power or protect the existing power by mo-bilising masses and the influence on Turkish politics was analysed. Based on the claim that every political movement is inherent, populism has been eval-uated both on the basisof power / opposition and on the right / left axis. For this purpose, speeches during 24th June presidential election that made by Recep Tayyip Erdoğan who was the candidate of the ruling party AKP (Justice and Development Party) that is representing the Turkey’s right-wing political axis and Muharrem İnce who was the candidate of the opposition party CHP (Republican People’s Party) that is representing the Turkey’s left-wing politi-cal axis, was examined by using Essex School Discourse Analysis method.

Özet

Popülizm, son on yıllarda gerek ekonomik gerekse politik analizlerde en fazla referans verilen, fakat anlamsal olarak neyi karşıladığı bir o kadar tartışmalı olan kavramlardan biridir. Genel olarak siyasetin ve özel olarak liberal demok-rasinin içine düştüğü temsil krizi ve ekonomik krizler ile bu krizlerin berabe-rinde getirdiği yapısal dönüşümler, popülizme olan yönelimi güçlendirmiştir. Demokrasinin bir tür gölgesine dönüşen popülizm, önemli ölçüde demokrasi ve liberalizm arasındaki gerilimlerden beslenmektedir. Bu çalışmada popülizm, iktidarı elde etmek veya mevcut iktidarını korumak isteyen siyasi aktörlerin kitleleri etkilemek adına kullandıkları bir söylem şekli olarak ele alınmış ve Türkiye siyasetine nasıl yansıdığı incelenmiştir. Her siyasi hareketin doğasında var olduğu iddiasından hareketle popülizm, hem ikti-dar/muhalefet temelinde, hem de sağ/sol eksende değerlendirilmiştir. Bu amaçla Türkiye sağını temsil eden iktidar partisi AKP’nin (Adalet ve Kalkınma Partisi) adayı Recep Tayyip Erdoğan ile Türkiye solunu temsil eden ana muha-lefet partisi CHP’nin (Cumhuriyet Halk Partisi) adayı Muharrem İnce’nin 24 Haziran Cumhurbaşkanlığı seçimleri sürecinde yaptıkları konuşmalar Essex Okulu Söylem Analizi yöntemiyle incelemiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

SIRMA, E., PARLAK, İ. (2020). THE RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POPULISM –DEMOCRACY in TURKEY: AN EVALUATION ON 24th JUNE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS. Memleket Siyaset Yönetim, Cilt: 15 - Sayı: 33, 141–180. https://ajindex.com/articles/275444

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (18)

  1. Açıkel, Fethi, “‘Kutsal Mazlumluğun’ Psikopatolojisi”, Toplum ve Bilim, Sayı 70, 1996, s. 153- 198. Aslanidis, Paris, “Is Populism an Ideology? A Refutation and A New Perspective”, Political Studies, 2015, (64)1, s. 88-104.
  2. Ateş, Kazım, “AKP, Dinsel Popülizm ve Halk-olmayan”, Mülkiye Dergisi, Cilt 41, Sayı 1, 2017, s. 105-129.
  3. Baştürk, Efe, “Mağduriyet İle İktidar Arzusu Arasında Türk Sağı: Komplo’cu Bir Söylemin Anatomisi”, Teorik Bakış Açısı, Sayı 5, 2014, s. 117-150.
  4. Canetti, Elias, Kitle ve İktidar, (Çev. Gülşat Aygen), Ayrıntı, İstanbul, 2006.
  5. Canovan, Margaret, “Trust the People! Populism and the Two Faces of Democracy”, Political Studies, (47)1, 1999, s.2-16.
  6. Çitçi, Oya, “Yeni Siyaset: Neoliberalizm ve Post-Modernizmin Siyasal Projesi”, YDÜ Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, Cilt 1, Sayı 2, 2008, s.2-32
  7. Dinç, Pınar, “Mapping Populism: Definitions, Cases, and Challenges to Democracy”, İstanbul Politikalar Merkezi Sabancı Üniversitesi, 2016, s. 1-16
  8. Durna, Tezcan ve Çağla Kubilay, “Söylem Kuramları ve Eleştirel Söylem Çözümlemeleri”, Medyadan Söylemler, (Ed.Tezcan Durna), Libra Kitap, İstanbul, 2010, s. 47-81.
  9. Eco, Umberto, Yengeç Adımlarıyla Sıcak Savaşlar ve Medyatik Popülizm, (Çev. Şemsa Gezgin), İstanbul, Doğan Yayınları, 2012, s. 91-92
  10. Jagers, Jan and Stefaan Walgrave, “Populism as Political Communication Style: An Empirical Study of Political Parties Discourse in Belgium”, European Journal of Political Science, (46)3, 2007, s. 319-345.
  11. Gidron, Noam, and Bart Bonikowski, “Varieties of Populism: Literature Review and Research Agenda”, Weatherhead Center For International Affaiırs, Harvard University, No: 13-0004, 2013.
  12. Heper, Metin, “The Ottoman Legacy and Turkish Politics”, Journal of International Affairs, (54)1, Fall 2000, s.63-82.
  13. Heper, Metin and E. Fuat Keyman, “Double-Faced State: Political Patronage and the Consolidation of Democracy in Turkey”, Middle Eastern Studies, (34)4, 1998, s.259-277.
  14. Laclau, Ernesto, Popülist Akıl Üzerine, (Çev.N. Betül Çelik), Epos, İstanbul, 2007.
  15. Laclau, Ernesto, Popülizm: Bir Ad Ne İçerir? (Çev. Hayriye Özen), Atılım Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 1(1), 2011, s.135-146.
  16. Laclau, Ernesto, Evrensellik, Kimlik ve Özgürleşme, (Çev. Ertuğrul Başer), Birikim Yayınları, İstanbul, 2012.
  17. Laclau, Ernesto and Chantal Mouffe, Hegemonya ve Sosyalist Strateji, (Çev.A. Kardam), Birikim Yayınları, İstanbul, 2008.
  18. Kalaylıoğlu, Mahir, “İktidarda Popülizm veya Tedrici Bir İnşa Süreci Olarak 2002-2010 AKP Dönemi:Bir Çerçeve Denemesi ve B