Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

Children's Experience in Family Tourism: The Case of Erzurum City

Çocukların Aile Turizmindeki Deneyimleri: Erzurum Kenti Örneği

Pages
263–278
Publication Date
2020-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The results showed that while family tourism was dominated by physical tourism in schools where economic structure was good, they spent time with friends in neighborhood parks (Built Environment) in the region where economic welfare was low.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Differences in tourism and recreation understanding have increased and recreation expectations of individuals have changed.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Children between the ages of 8-11 were asked to express their holiday expectations by drawing pictures.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The results showed that while family tourism was dominated by physical tourism in schools where economic structure was good, they spent time with friends in neighborhood parks (Built Environment) in the region where economic welfare was low.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Turizm · Tatil · Ebeveyn

Abstract

Differences in tourism and recreation understanding have increased and recreation expectations of individuals have changed. There has been a change in the quality of consumption for the concept of family tourism. In the scope of this study, Three schools with different socio-economic status were identified in Erzurum. Children between the ages of 8-11 were asked to express their holiday expectations by drawing pictures. The results showed that while family tourism was dominated by physical tourism in schools where economic structure was good, they spent time with friends in neighborhood parks (Built Environment) in the region where economic welfare was low. As a result, when drawing forest, mountain and green areas in the pictures, tourism and vacation experience were generally preferred as water activities. It has been determined that children will turn to new destinations for tourism purposes in the future and contribute to the regional development of the tourism industry.

Özet

Turizm ve rekreasyon anlayışındaki farklılaşmalar artmış ve bireylerin rekreasyon beklentileri değişmiştir. Aile turizmi kavramı içim tüketim niteliği değişikliği oluşmuştur. Çalışmada, Erzurum’da sosyo-ekonomik deneyimleri farklı 3 okul belirlenmiştir. 8-11 yaş aralığındaki çocuktan tatil beklentilerini resim çizerek anlatması istenmiştir. Çıkan sonuçlarda, ekonomik yapının iyi olduğu okullarda, aile ile yapılan deniz turizmi (Fiziksel aktivite)baskın çıkarken, ekonomik refahın düşük olduğu bölgede arkadaşlarıyla mahalle parklarında (Yapılı Çevre) zaman geçirdikleri resmedilmiştir. Sonuç olarak, çocukların gelecekte, turizm amaçlı yeni destinasyonlara yöneleceği ve turizm endüstrisinin bölgesel gelişimine katkılar sağlayacağını belirlenmiştir.

🔖

Cite This Article

AYTATLI, B., KUZULUGİL, A. C., YILDIZ, N. D., İSPİRLİ, N. S. (2020). Children's Experience in Family Tourism: The Case of Erzurum City. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 263–278. https://ajindex.com/articles/27541

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (9)

  1. Arendell, T. (2000).“Conceiving and investigating motherhood: the decade’s scholarship”, Journal of Marriage and Family, Vol. 62 No. 4, pp. 1192-207.
  2. Aydın O (2012).“AB’de Kırsal Turizmde İlk 5 Ülke ve Türkiye’de Kırsal Turizm”. Karamanoğlu Mehmetbey Üni. Sosyal ve Ekonomı̇k Araştırmalar Derg. 14 (23): 39-46. Aymankuy ve Ceylan( 2013).“Ailelerin Turistik ürün Satın Alma Karar Surecinde Çocukların Rolü (Yerli Turistler Üzerinde Bir Araştırma”, Elektronik Sosyal Bilimler Dergisiwww.Esosder.Org,Issn:1304-0278 Cilt:12 Sayı:45 (105-122) Spring-2013 Volume:12 Issue:45 Berber Ş. (2003).“Sosyal Değişme Katalizörü Olarak Turizm Ve Etkileri”, Selçuk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü,dergisosyalbil.selcuk.edu.tr Blichfeldt, B. S. Pedersen, B. M. Johansen, A. & Hansen, L. (2011). “Tweens on Holidays.In-Situ Decision-Making from Children's Perspective”.Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism,11(2), 135-149.
  3. Carr, N. (2011). Children’s and families holiday’s experience. Abingdon: Taylor & Francis. Cicero, L.&Osti, L.(2018).“Guesteditorial”. YoungConsumers,19(2),121–126.
  4. Collier, J. & Collier, M. (1986).Visual anthropology: Photography as a research method. UNM Press.
  5. Cullingford, C. (1995). “Children’s Attitudesto Holiday Overseas”. Tourism Management, 16, 121–127.
  6. Flurry, A. L. (2007).“Children‟s Influence in Family Decision-Making: Examining the Impact of the Changing American Family”.Journal of Business Research,60, 322-330.
  7. Johns, N. and Gyimothy,S. (2003). “Postmodern Family Tourism in Legoland.” Scandinavian Journal of Hospitality and Tourism3 (1): 3–23. doi: 10.1080/15022250310001549 [Taylor & Francis Online], [Google Scholar] 3. Karafakı F, Yazgan M.(2012).“Kırsal Turizme Kavramsal Yaklaşım, Kırsal Turizmin Önemi ve Etkileri”. IJSES Uluslararası Sosyal ve EkonomikBilimler Dergisi, 2 (2): 55-58.
  8. Loeffler, T. A. (2004). “A Photo Elicitation Study of the Meaningsof Outdoor Adventure Experiences”.Journal of Leisure Research,36(4), 536-556. Mansuroğlu,S. ve Kınıklı,P.(2009).“Alternatif Turizm Alanlarının Saptanmasında SWOT Analizi Tekniğinin Peyzaj Planlama Açısından Uygulanabilirliği: Antalya/Akseki Örneği”. 1. GAP Organik Tarım Kongresi,574-584, Şanlıurfa. McGehee,N.G.(2002). “Alternative Tourısm and Social Movements”. Annals of Tourism Research.29(1): 12414. Nickerson, N. & Jurowski, C. (2001). “The Influence of Children on Vacation Travel Patterns”. Journal of Vacation Marketing, 7, 19–30.
  9. Obrador, P. (2012). “The Placeof the Family in Tourism Resear