Journals / Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2021 / Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1

Determination of Field Use Changes by Using Landscape Metrics: “Erzurum City Example”

Pages
661–671
Publication Date
2021-03-01
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Using the Patch Analyst 4.2 software, the interactions, fragmentation states, habitat qualities, sizes, differences of the patches that make up the matrix of the research area were evaluated on the basis of landscape ecology.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The human increases environmental pressures and consumes resources.
📊
Key Findings & Data:They combine with different landscape matrices and patches to form an integrated landscape mosaic.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Using the Patch Analyst 4.2 software, the interactions, fragmentation states, habitat qualities, sizes, differences of the patches that make up the matrix of the research area were evaluated on the basis of landscape ecology.
🔬Design:Modeling & Simulation
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Landscape metrics · Urban open-green area · Erzurum

Abstract

The human increases environmental pressures and consumes resources. Therefore; Landscapes are also changed by natural events or human beings over time. Landscape ecology examines these changing relationships and takes landscape as a level and system within the concept of hierarchical order. Landscape structure analysis is an important method used in ecological planning studies, which analyzes the landscapes in the matrix-patch-corridor model by dividing them into units and provides analytical data with the help of landscape metrics and interprets the landscape structure. In this context, ecological-based planning should be made in cities, corridors are created. Aquatic and Terrestrial ecological corridors are ecosystems that connect two different landscape matrices. They combine with different landscape matrices and patches to form an integrated landscape mosaic. This approach, which also forms the basis of green infrastructure systems, emphasizes centers, connections. The green infrastructure is designed with a systematic approach that ensures the sustainability of ecological networks, protects and improves natural and cultural living environments, within the scope of the landscape system integrity, on a city scale. In this context, Erzurum city green areas, centers and their connections are handled ecologically. In order to protect the existence of urban flora and fauna, to ensure the integrity and to maintain continuity, it is desired to fulfill green infrastructure requirements. Using the Patch Analyst 4.2 software, the interactions, fragmentation states, habitat qualities, sizes, differences of the patches that make up the matrix of the research area were evaluated on the basis of landscape ecology.

Özet

The human increases environmental pressures and consumes resources. Therefore; Landscapes are also changed by natural events or human beings over time. Landscape ecology examines these changing relationships and takes landscape as a level and system within the concept of hierarchical order. Landscape structure analysis is an important method used in ecological planning studies, which analyzes the landscapes in the matrix-patch-corridor model by dividing them into units and provides analytical data with the help of landscape metrics and interprets the landscape structure. In this context, ecological-based planning should be made in cities, corridors are created. Aquatic and Terrestrial ecological corridors are ecosystems that connect two different landscape matrices. They combine with different landscape matrices and patches to form an integrated landscape mosaic. This approach, which also forms the basis of green infrastructure systems, emphasizes centers, connections. The green infrastructure is designed with a systematic approach that ensures the sustainability of ecological networks, protects and improves natural and cultural living environments, within the scope of the landscape system integrity, on a city scale. In this context, Erzurum city green areas, centers and their connections are handled ecologically. In order to protect the existence of urban flora and fauna, to ensure the integrity and to maintain continuity, it is desired to fulfill green infrastructure requirements. Using the Patch Analyst 4.2 software, the interactions, fragmentation states, habitat qualities, sizes, differences of the patches that make up the matrix of the research area were evaluated on the basis of landscape ecology.

🔖

Cite This Article

YILDIZ, N. D., AVDAN, U., AYTATLI, B., KUZULUGİL, A., AVCI, E. (2021). Determination of Field Use Changes by Using Landscape Metrics: “Erzurum City Example”. Iğdır Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 11 - Sayı: 1, 661–671. https://ajindex.com/articles/256367

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (10)

  1. Ahern J, 2007. Green infrastructure for cities: the spatial dimension, University of Massachusetts, Amherst MA 01003, USA, 267-283 pp. Anonim 2019. Erzurum İl Kültür ve Turizm Müdürlüğü, https://erzurum.ktb.gov.tr/TR-56063/cografya.html (Erişim tarihi: 20.02.2019)
  2. Balaban O, Tamer N. G, 2016. Kentsel Planlama Ansiklopedik Sözlük. Ersoy, M. (Der.). İklim Değişikliği, Küresel Isınma ve Kentler içinde (ss.152-155). Ninova Bastian O, 2001. Landscape ecology-towards a unified discipline, Landscape Ecology, 16: 757-766 pp. Benliay A, 2009. Peyzaj Planı Oluşturulması Bağlamında Finike–Kumluca Kıyı Bölgesinin Değerlendirilmesi, Ankara Üniversitesi Fen Bilimleri Enstitüsü Peyzaj Mimarlığı Ana Bilim Dalı, Doktora Tezi,249s (Basılmış) Boongaling C.G.K, Faustino-Eslava D.V, Lansigan P.F, 2018. Modeling land use change impacts on hydrology and the use of landscape metrics as tools for watershed management: The case of an ungauged catchment in the Philippines, Land Use Policy Volume 72, March 2018, Pages 116-128
  3. Cushman S. A, McGarigal K, Neel M. C, 2008. Parsimony in landscape metrics: strength, universality, and consistency, Ecological indicators, 8(5): 691-703 pp. Demir S, Demirel Ö, 2018. Peyzaj planlamada peyzaj ekolojisi yaklaşımı. Türkiye Peyzaj Araştırmaları Dergisi, 1(1), 1-8.
  4. Deniz B, Küçükerbaş E.V, Eşbah Tuncay H, 2006.
  5. Peyzaj ekolojisine genel bakış, Adnan Menderes Üniversitesi Ziraat Fakültesi Dergisi, Aydın, 3(20): 5-18
  6. Dramstad W.E, Olston J.D, Forman R.T.T, 1996. Landscape Ecology Principles in Landscape Architecture and Land-Use Planning, Insland Press,
  7. Washington DC, USA, 71p. Eroğlu D, 2018. Sürdürülebilir Yaşam Penceresinden Yerel ve Kırsal Kalkınma. Bayramoğlu, M ve Gür, F. (Ed.). Kırsal Yayım ve İletişim: Teoriden Pratiğe içinde (ss. 301-328). İstanbul: Özyeğin Üniversitesi Farina A, 2000. Landscape Ecology in Action. Lunigiana Museum of Natural History, Aulla Italy, Venice University, Venice, Italy, Urbino University, Urbina, Italy Kluwer Academic Publishers,
  8. Dordrecht, Netherlands, 324p. Forman R.T.T, 1995.
  9. Land Mosaics, The Ecology of Landscape and Regions, Cambridge University Press,
  10. Cambridge, UK, 656p. Forman R.T.T, 2008. Urban Regions; Ecology and Planning Beyond the City. Cambridge University Press Gordon A, Simondsona D, Whiteb M, Moilanenc A, Bekessya S.A, 2009. Integrating conservation planning and landuse planning in urban landscapes, Landscape and Urban Planning, 91: 183–194 pp. Gökyer E, 2009. Bartın Kenti ve Arıt Havzasında Peyzaj D