Journals / Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi / 2020 / Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1

The Mediating Role of Positive Psychological Capital on the Relationship between Leader Member Exchange and Organizational Silence: A Research in Service Sector

Lider-Üye Etkileşimi ve Örgütsel Sessizlik Arasındaki İlişkide Pozitif Psikolojik Sermayenin Aracı Rolü: Hizmet Sektöründe Bir Araştırma

Pages
1–20
Publication Date
2020-03-15
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

The theoretical and practical effects of the research results were discussed and suggestions were made for future studies and sector managers.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:The interaction between the leader and his/her followers is one of the most important determinants of the attitudes and behaviors of the parties to each other.
📊
Key Findings & Data:The research data were obtained from a survey of 390 employees of a company operating in the field of aviation.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:The theoretical and practical effects of the research results were discussed and suggestions were made for future studies and sector managers.
🔬Design:Survey & Empirical Study
📍Scope:Comprehensive Sample
⚙️Variables:Lider-üye etkileşimi · örgütsel sessizlik · pozitif psikolojik sermaye

Abstract

The interaction between the leader and his/her followers is one of the most important determinants of the attitudes and behaviors of the parties to each other. High quality exchange is a sign of strong communication and trust between the parties. The aim of this study was to investigate whether there is a mediating effect of positive psychological capital in the relationship between leader-member exchange and organizational silence. The research data were obtained from a survey of 390 employees of a company operating in the field of aviation. As a result of the research, it was determined that positive psychological capital had a partial mediating effect on the relationship between leader-member excahnge and organizational silence. The theoretical and practical effects of the research results were discussed and suggestions were made for future studies and sector managers.

Özet

Lider ile takipçileri arasındaki etkileşim, tarafların birbirlerine olan tutum ve davranışlarının en önemli belirleyicilerinden birisidir. Yüksek kalitede etkileşim, taraflar arasındaki güçlü iletişimin ve güvenin göstergesidir. Bu araştırma, lider-üye etkileşimi ile örgütsel sessizlik arasındaki ilişkide pozitif psikolojik sermayenin aracı etkisinin olup olmadığını incelemek amacıyla yapılmıştır. Araştırma verileri havacılık alanında faaliyet gösteren bir işletmenin 390 çalışanına yapılan anket sonucunda elde edilmiştir. Araştırma sonucunda lider-üye etkileşimi ve örgütsel sessizlik arasındaki ilişkide pozitif psikolojik sermayenin kısmi aracı etkisinin bulunduğu tespit edilmiştir. Elde edilen araştırma sonuçlarının teorik ve pratik etkileri tartışılarak gelecekte yapılacak çalışmalara ve sektör yöneticilerine önerilerde bulunulmuştur.

🔖

Cite This Article

KOÇAK, D., ÇINAR, O. (2020). The Mediating Role of Positive Psychological Capital on the Relationship between Leader Member Exchange and Organizational Silence: A Research in Service Sector. Atatürk Üniversitesi Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü Dergisi, Cilt: 24 - Sayı: 1, 1–20. https://ajindex.com/articles/27524

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (12)

  1. Acaray, A., Çekmecelioğlu, H. veAkturan, A. (2015). “Örgüt Kültürü ile Örgütsel Sessizlik Arasındaki İlişkinin İncelenmesi”. The Journal of Academic Social Science Studies, 32, 139-157.
  2. Akçay, V. H. (2011). Pozitif Psikolojik Sermayenin Kişisel Değerler Bakımından İş Tatminine Etkisi ve Bir Araştırma, (Yayınlanmamış doktora tezi), İstanbul:İstanbul Üniversitesi/Sosyal Bilimler Enstitüsü. Aktaş, H. ve Şimşek, E. (2015). “Bireylerin Örgütsel Sessizlik Tutumlarında İş Doyumu ve Duygusal Tükenmişlik Algılarının Rolü”. Uluslararası Yönetim İktisat ve İşletme Dergisi, 11(24), 205-230.
  3. Bandura, A. (Ed.). (1995). Self-Efficacy in Changing Societies. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Baron, R. M. andKenny, D. A. (1986). “The Moderator–Mediator Variable Distinction in Social Psychological Research: Conceptual, Strategic, and Statistical Considerations”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology,51(6), 1173-1182.
  5. Bauer, T. N. andGreen,G. (1996). “Development of Leader–Member Exchange: A Longitudinal Test”. Academy of Management Journal, 39(6), 1538-1567.
  6. Beheshtifar, M.,Borhani, H. andMoghadam, M. N. (2012). “Destructive Role of Employee Silence in Organizational Success”, International Journal of Academic Research in Business and Social Sciences,2(11), 275-282.
  7. Bingham, W.V. (1927).“Leadership, in Metcalf, H.C. (Ed.), The Psychological Foundations of Management, (410-435).
  8. New York. Brown, S.D.(2007). “Three Minutes of Silence: Thinking in Duration in Organization Studies”. TAMARA: Journal of Critical Postmodern Organization Science, 6 (1/2), 159-175.
  9. Büyüköztürk, Ş. (2011). SosyalBilimler İçin Veri Analizi El Kitabı, Ankara: Pegem Akademi. Chan: C. andYeung, D. (2016). “The Impact of Leader-Member Exchange (LMX) and Empowerment on Employee Voice Behavior”.Nang Yan Business Journal,4(1), 44-55.
  10. Dansereau, F., Graen, G.B.andHaga, W. (1975). “A Vertical Dyad Linkage Approach to Leadership in Formal Organizations”. Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 13, 46-78.
  11. Durarajen, A. (2004). Leader-Member Exchange and Job Satisfaction, (Unpublished doctoral thesis), University Sains Malaysia. Dyne, L. V., Ang S. andBotero I. C. (2003). “Conceptualizing Employee Silence and Employee Voice as Multidimensional Constructs”, Journal of Management Studies, 40(6), 1359-1392.
  12. Edwards, J. R. andLambert, L. S. (2007). “Methods for İntegrating Moderation and Mediation: A General Analytical Framework Using Moderated Path Analysis”. Psychological Methods, 12(1), 1-22. Fair