Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2019 / Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4

HOW SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS ARE AFFECTED AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR SCHEUERMANN’S KYPHOSIS

Pages
257–260
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

Conclusion: Surgical treatment for SK seems to have little or no influence on changing SSPs.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: The relationship between the pelvis and spine is critical in global spinal alignment and sagittal imbalance and its associated compensatory mechanisms have been reported to correlate with negatively influenced quality of life.
📊
Key Findings & Data:Materials and Methods: The database of the institution was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent surgery for SK between the years of 2012 and 2015.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:Conclusion: Surgical treatment for SK seems to have little or no influence on changing SSPs.
🔬Design:Review & Systematic Survey
📍Scope:2012 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: The relationship between the pelvis and spine is critical in global spinal alignment and sagittal imbalance and its associated compensatory mechanisms have been reported to correlate with negatively influenced quality of life. There are several studies evaluating the sagittal spinopelvic parameters (SSPs) in many areas of spinal disorders but studies evaluating the SSPs in Scheuermann’s kyphosis (SK) are limited. To evaluate the effect of surgical treatment on SSPs in patients affected by SK. Materials and Methods: The database of the institution was retrospectively reviewed to identify patients who underwent surgery for SK between the years of 2012 and 2015. Twenty-nine patients were included, and records of these patients were reviewed. Changes in pelvic incidence (PI), pelvic tilt (PT), sacral slope (SS), cervical lordosis (CL), thoracic kyphosis (TK), lumbar lordosis (LL), and the sagittal vertical axis (SVA) measurements were compared. Results: There were no significant changes in PI, PT, SVA, and SS compared to preoperative values. There were decreases in TK and LL measurements, which were statistically significant. Conclusion: Surgical treatment for SK seems to have little or no influence on changing SSPs.

🔖

Cite This Article

DEMİRÖZ, S., POLAT, B., ÇARKÇI, E., ERDOĞAN, S., ATICI, Y. (2019). HOW SPINOPELVIC PARAMETERS ARE AFFECTED AFTER SURGICAL TREATMENT FOR SCHEUERMANN’S KYPHOSIS. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 30 - Sayı: 4, 257–260. https://ajindex.com/articles/270694

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (11)

  1. Ashraf A, Noelle Larson A, Polly DW, Ferski G, Guidera KJ, Mielke CH. Change in Sagittal plane alignment following surgery for Scheuermann’s Kyphosis. Spine Deform 2014;2:404-9
  2. Bradford DS, Ahmed KB, Moe JH, Winter RB, Lonstein JE. The surgical management of patients with Scheuermann’s disease: a review of twenty-four cases managed by combined anterior and posterior spine fusion. J Bone Joint Surg Am 1980;62:705-12
  3. Cil A, Yazici M, Uzumcugil A, Kandemir U, Alanay A, Alanay Y, et al. The evolution of sagittal segmental alignment of the spine during childhood. Spine 2005;30:93-100
  4. Damborg F, Engell V, Andersen M, Kyvik KO, Thomsen K. Prevalence, concordance, and heritability of Scheuermann kyphosis based on a study of twins. J Bone Joint Surg Am 2006;88:2133-6
  5. Eddine TA, Migaud H, Chantelot C, Cotten A, Fontaine C, Duquennoy A. Variations of pelvic anteversion in the lying and standing positions: analysis of 24 control subjects and implications for CT measurement of position of a prosthetic cup. Surg Radiol Anat 2001;23:105-10
  6. El-Hawary R, Sturm PF, Cahill PJ, Samdani AF, Vitale MG, Gabos PG, et al. Sagittal spinopelvic parameters of young children with scoliosis. Spine Deformity 2013;1:343-7 7. Faldini C, Di Martino A, Perna F, Martikos K, Greggi T, Giannini S. Changes in spino-pelvic alignment after surgical treatment of highgrade isthmic spondylolisthesis by a posterior approach: a report of 41 cases. Eur Spine J 2014;23:714-9
  7. Geck MJ, Macagno A, Ponte A, Shufflebarger HL. The Ponte procedure: posterior only treatment of Scheuermann’s kyphosis using segmental posterior shortening and pedicle screw instrumentation. J Spinal Disord Tech 2007;20:586-93
  8. Guler O, Akgul T, Korkmaz M, Gunerbuyuk C, Sariyilmaz K, Dikici F, et al. Postoperative changes in sacropelvic junction in shortsegment angular kyphosis versus Scheuermann kyphosis. Eur Spine J 2017;3:928-36
  9. Hosman AJ, Langeloo DD, de Kleuver, Anderson PG, Veth RP, Slot GH. Analysis of the sagittal plane after surgical management for Scheuermann’s disease: a view on overcorrection and the use of an anterior release. Spine 2002;27:167-75
  10. Labelle H, Roussouly P, Berthonnaud E, Transfeldt E, O’Brien M, Chopin D, et al. Spondylolisthesis, pelvic incidence, and spinopelvic balance: a correlation study. Spine 2004;29:2049-54
  11. Lafage V, Schwab F, Patel A, Hawkinson N, Farcy JP. Pelvic tilt and truncal inclination: two key radiographic parameters in the setting of adults wi