Journals / Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery / 2020 / Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1

UNINTENDED DURAL INJURY IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINAL SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY

Pages
28–31
DOI
—
🏛️Bibliographic metadata and full text access for this article are provided via DergiPark.
DergiPark Record ↗
✨

AI Summary & Key Takeaways

AI Insight
⚡ TL;DR(Too Long; Didn't Read)

It is very important to properly diagnose and treat additional complications caused by unintended dural injury.

📌 3 Key Takeaways

🎯
Objective & Hypothesis:Objective: Unintended dural injury rate in all spinal surgeries is between 0.2% and 20%.
📊
Key Findings & Data:This rate approaches the upper rates in degenerative lumbar surgery.
💡
Conclusion & Impact:It is very important to properly diagnose and treat additional complications caused by unintended dural injury.
🔬Design:Research Article
📍Scope:2011 Verileri
⚙️Variables:Domain Parameters

Özet

Objective: Unintended dural injury rate in all spinal surgeries is between 0.2% and 20%. This rate approaches the upper rates in degenerative lumbar surgery. Unintended dural injury occurs due to many factors and revision surgery is one of these reasons. As a result of the injury, the possibility of neurological deficits is not high, but conditions such as headache, pesudomeningocele, superficial infection, meningitis and radicular pain can occur. However, these complications can be solved today. In our study, we aimed to evaluate unintended dural injury and its results retrospectively. Materials and Methods: Between 2011 and 2018, 376 (225 female and 151 male) patients who had undergone decompression and posterior lumbar pedicle screw fixation were included in the study. Fifty-eight patients were operated due to revision surgery. The mean patient age was 57.35 years (range: 33-79 years). Dural injuries were sutured with microsurgical technique and sealant was used. All patients were recommended bed rest between 24 and 48 hours. Results: The number of unintended dural injuries was 26. Eleven patients with dural injury were operated for revision surgery. There was pseudomeningocele in three patients, superficial wound infection in three patients, meningitis in one patient, and transient radicular symptoms in 12 patients. Twenty-one patients had early cerebral hypotension and all responded to the medication. Conclusion: Unintended dural injury occurring in surgeries performed due to lumbar degenerative process does not significantly affect surgical results. It is very important to properly diagnose and treat additional complications caused by unintended dural injury.

🔖

Cite This Article

ÇİVİ, S. (2020). UNINTENDED DURAL INJURY IN DEGENERATIVE LUMBAR SPINAL SURGERY: A RETROSPECTIVE STUDY. Journal of Turkish Spinal Surgery, Cilt: 31 - Sayı: 1, 28–31. https://ajindex.com/articles/270692

📄 Full Text PDF Viewer

📄

PDF görüntüleyici hazırlanıyor...

References (15)

  1. Papavero L, Engler N, Kothe R. Incidental durotomy in spine surgery: first aid in ten steps. Eur Spine J. 2015;24:2077-84
  2. Ghobrial GM, Theofanis T, Darden BV, Arnold P, Fehlings MG, Harrop JS. Unintended durotomy in lumbar degenerative spinal surgery: a 10-year systematic review of the literature. Neurosurg Focus. 2015;39:E8
  3. Stromqvist F, Jonsson B, Stromqvist B. Dural lesions in lumbar disc herniation surgery: incidence, risk factors, and outcome. Eur Spine J. 2010;19:439-42
  4. Khan MH, Rihn J, Steele G, Davis R, Donaldson WF 3rd, Kang JD, et al. Postoperative management protocol for incidental dural tears during degenerative lumbar spine surgery: a review of 3,183 consecutive degenerative lumbar cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2006;31:2609-13
  5. Stolke D, Sollman W, Seifert V. Intra- and postoperative complications in lumbar disc surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989;14:56-9
  6. O’Connor D, Maskery N, Griffiths WE. Pseudomeningocele nerve root entrapment after lumbar discectomy. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1998;23:1501-2
  7. Koo J, Adamson R, Wagner Jr FC, Hrdy DB. A new cause of chronic meningitis: infected lumbar pseudmeningocele. Am J Med. 1989;86:103-4
  8. Eismont FJ, Wiesel SW, Rothman RH. Treatment of dural tears associated with spinal surgery. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1981;63:1132-6
  9. Radcliff KE, Sidhu GD, Kepler CK, Gruskay J, Anderson DG, Hilibrand A, et al. Complications of Flat Bed Rest After İncidental Durotomy. Clin Spine Surg. 2016;29:281-4
  10. Cammisa FP Jr, Girardi FP, Sangani PK, Parvataneni HK, Cadag S, Sandhu HS. Incidental durotomy in spine surgery. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000;25:2663-7
  11. Hodges SD, Humphreys SC, Eck JC, Covington LA. Management of incidental durotomy without mandatory bed rest. A retrospective review of 20 cases. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1999;24:2062-4
  12. Kalevski SK, Peev NA, Haritonov DG. Incidental Dural Tears in lumbar decompressive surgery: Incidence, causes, treatment, results. Asian J Neurosurg. 2010;5:54-59
  13. Bosacco SJ, Gardner MJ, Guille JT. Evaluation and treatment of dural tears in lumbar spine surgery: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001;389:238-47
  14. Guerin P, El Fegoun AB, Obeid I, Gille O, Lelong L, Luc S, et al. Incidental durotomy during spine surgery: incidence, management and complications. A retrospective review. Injury. 2012;43:397-401
  15. Saxler G, Kramer J, Barden B, Kurt A, Pförtner J, Bernsmann K. The long-term clinical sequelae of incidental durotomy in lumbar disc surgery.